Fallacies and argument appraisal

Fallacies and Argument Appraisal

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-218

  Tindale, Christopher W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924003019     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511806544     Document Type: Book

References (61)

1. Charles L. Hamblin, Fallacies (London: Methuen, 1970), p. 12.
2. Hans V. Hansen, "The Straw Thing of Fallacy Theory," Argumentation 16 (2002), pp. 133-155.
3. Frans van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions (Dordrecht: Foris, 1984)
4. Argumentation Communication and Fallacies (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992)
5. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
6. Max Black, Critical Thinking (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1952), pp. 229-230.
7. Wesley Salmon, Logic (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963)
8. James D. Carney and Richard K. Scheer, Fundamentals of Logic (New York: Macmillan, 1964).
9. Douglas Walton, "The Straw Man Fallacy," in Logic and Argumentation, edited by Johan van Benthem et al. (Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts & Sciences, 1996), pp. 115-128
10. S. Chase, Guide to Straight Thinking (New York: Harper & Row, 1956), p. 40.
11. Charles L. Hamblin, Fallacies (London: Methuen, 1970).
12. Douglas Walton, Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
13. "An attack on a viewpoint must represent the viewpoint that has really been advanced by the protagonist" (p. 77).
14. Charles L. Hamblin, Fallacies (London: Methuen, 1970)
15. Gerald J. Massey, "Are There Any Good Arguments That Bad Arguments Are Bad?" Philosophy in Context 4 (1975), pp. 61-77
16. Douglas Walton, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1995).
17. Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto, Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1995), p. 5.
18. Charles L. Hamblin, Fallacies (London: Methuen, 1970), p. 25.
19. Lawrence H. Powers, "Equivocation," in Hansen and Pinto, Fallacies, pp. 287-301.
20. Fran van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992), p. 202.
21. "the indeterminateness of this statement makes it impossible to assess its acceptability as a premise or its significance as a conclusion." Logical Self-Defense, 3rd ed. (Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1993), p. 153.
22. George Orwell, "Politics and the English Language," Horizon 13 (1946), pp. 252-265.
23. Hamblin, Fallacies, p. 4.
24. John Woods, Paradox and Consistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 26.
25. John Woods and Douglas Walton, Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972-1982 (Dordrecht: Foris, 1989).
26. John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic (London: Longmans, Green, 1900), Bk. V, chap. VII.
27. Charles L. Hamblin, Fallacies (London: Methuen, 1970), p. 161.
28. John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by A. C. Fraser (New York: Dover, 1959 [1690]), sect. 21.
29. Alan Brinton, "The Ad Hominem," in Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, edited by Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1995), p. 214.
30. Frans van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, "Argumentum Ad Hominem: A Pragma-Dialectical Case in Point," in Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, edited by Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1995), p. 225.
31. Fran van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 177.
32. Trudy Govier, "Philosophy, Life and Philosophies of Life," Philosophy Now 49 (2005), pp. 23-25.
33. Charles L. Hamblin, Fallacies (London: Methuen, 1970), p. 41.
34. Douglas Walton, Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
35. John Woods, "Appeal to Force," in Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, edited by Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1995) pp.240-250.
36. Fran van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
37. Douglas Walton, Appeal to Pity: Argumentum ad Misericordian (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997), p. 152.
38. Erik C.W. Krabbe, "Appeal to Ignorance," in Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, edited by Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1995).
39. John Woods and Douglas Walton, Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972-1982 (Dordrecht: Foris, 1989), p. 15.
40. Charles L. Hamblin, Fallacies (London: Methuen, 1970), p. 218.
41. Wesley Salmon, Logic (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963), p. 64.
42. Douglas Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1997), p. 176.
43. Charles A. Willard, "Authority," Informal Logic 12 (1990), pp. 11-22.
44. Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole, Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole: Logic and the Art of Thinking, edited by Jill Vance Buroker (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
45. Douglas Walton, Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 15.
46. Charles L. Hamblin, Fallacie (London: Methuen, 1970), p. 47.
47. S. Morris Engel, With Good Reason, 4th ed. (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1994), pp. 133-136.
48. Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, "Judgment under Uncertainty, Heuristics and Biases," in Judgment under Uncertainty, Heuristics and Biases, edited by D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 3-20.
49. Tversky and Kahneman, "Judgment," p. 6.
50. Gerd Gigerenzer, Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 19.
51. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harrispoll/index. asp?PID=579.
52. Douglas Walton, Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 100-101.
53. Robert C. Pinto, "Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc," in Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, edited by Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1995), pp. 302-311.
54. Antony Beevor, The Fall of Berlin 1945 (New York: Viking, 2002), p. 430.
55. Julian Huxley, Evolution: The Modern Synthesis (London: Allen & Unwin, 1942), p. 495.
56. Douglas Walton, Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 96-99.
57. Charles L. Hamblin, Fallacies (London: Methuen, 1970), p. 142.
58. Frans van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992), p. 163.
59. Trudy Govier, A Practical Study of Argument, 6th ed. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2005), p. 379.
60. Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (Dordrecht: Foris, 1987), Chapter 4
61. The Philosophy of Argument (Newport News, VA: Vale Press,1999), Chapter 9.