The other invisible hand: Delivering public services through choice and competition

The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Services through Choice and Competition

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-195

  Le Grand, Julian ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924000063     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (153)

1. Abildgaard, J., and T. Vad. 2003. Can vouchers work for health? The Scandinavian experience. Progressive Politics 2:35-40.
2. Alvarez-Rosete, A., G. Bevan, N. Mays and J. Dixon. 2005. Effect of diverging policy across the NHS. British Medical Journal 331:946-50.
3. Anderson, R., and D. Anderson. 1999. The cost-effectiveness of home birth. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 44:30-35.
4. Appleby, J., and A. Alvarez-Rosete. 2005. Public response to NHS reform. In The British Social Attitudes Survey, 22nd Report. London: Sage.
5. Appleby, J., A. Harrison and N. Devlin. 2003. What Is the Real Cost of More Patient Choice? London: Kings Fund.
6. Audit Commission. 2004. Choice in Public Services. London:Audit Commission.
7. Auditor General forWales. 2005.NHSWaiting Times forWales. Volume 2: Tackling the Problem. Cardiff: National Audit Office Wales.
8. Bergstrom, F., and M. Sandstrom. 2002. School vouchers in practice: competition won't hurt you. Working Paper 578(2002), Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IUI), Stockholm.
9. Bevan, G., and C. Hood. 2006. Have targets improved performance in the English NHS? British Medical Journal 332:419-22.
10. Bevan, G., and C. Hood. Forthcoming. What's measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration.
11. Bositis, D. 1999. National Opinion Poll-Education 1999.Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
12. Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 1998. Efficient redistribution: new rules for markets, states and communities, In Recasting Egalitarianism: New Rules for Communities, States and Markets (ed. E. OlinWright). London: Verso.
13. Bradley, S., and J. Taylor. 2002. The effect of the quasi-market on the efficiency-equity trade-off in the secondary school sector. Bulletin of Economic Research 54:295-314.
14. Bradley, S., G. Johnes and J. Millington. 2001. The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England. European Journal of Operational Research 135:545-68.
15. Burgess, S., and A. Briggs. 2006. School assignment, school choice and social mobility. Centre for Market and Public Organisation, Discussion Paper DP 06/157. University of Bristol.
16. Burgess, S., C. Propper and D.Wilson. 2005.Will More Choice Improve Outcomes in Education and Health Care? The Evidence fromEconomic Research. University of Bristol: The Centre for Market and Public Organisation.
17. Burgess, S., B. McConell, C. Propper and D. Wilson. 2007. The impact of school choice on sorting by ability and socio-economic factors in English secondary education. In Schools and the Equal Opportunity Problem (ed. L.Woessman and P. Peterson). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Caton, H. 2006. The flat-pack patient? Creating health together. Patient Education and Counseling 62:288-89.
19. Centre for Economic Performance. 2006. The Depression Report. London School of Economics.
20. Chamberlain, T., S. Rutt and F. Fletcher-Campbell. 2006. Admissions:Who Goes Where? Messages from Statistics. Slough:National Foundation for Educational Research.
21. Chater, D., and J. Le Grand. 2006. Looked After or Overlooked? Good Parenting and School Choice for Looked After Children. London: Social Market Foundation.
22. Coast, J. 2001. Who wants to know if their care is rationed? Views of citizens and service informants. Health Expectations 4:243-52.
23. Coulter, A. 2002. The Autonomous Patient: Ending Paternalism in Medical Care. London: The Nuffield Trust.
24. Coulter, A., N. Le Maistre and L. Henderson. 2005. Patients' Experience of Choosing where to Undergo Surgical Treatment-Evaluation of the London Patient Choice Scheme. Oxford:Picker Institute.
25. Crilly, T., and J. Le Grand. 2004. The motivation and behaviour of hospital trusts. Social Science and Medicine 58:1809-23.
26. Crouch, C. 2003. Commercialisation or Citizenship: Education Policy and the Future of Public Services. London: Fabian Society.
27. Cullen, J. B., B. Jacob and S. Levitt. 2000. The impact of school choice on student outcomes: an analysis of the Chicago public schools. NBER Working Paper 7888, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
28. Dale, S., R. Brown, B. Phillips, J. Schore and B. Lepidus Carlson. 2003. The effects of cash and counseling on personal care services and Medicaid costs in Arkansas. Health Affairs November:566-75.
29. Damiani, M., J. Dixon and C. Propper. 2005. Mapping choice in the NHS: cross-sectional study of analysis of routinely collected data. British Medical Journal 330:284.
30. Dawson, D., R. Jacobs, S. Martin and P. Smith. 2004. Evaluation of the London Patient Choice Project: system-wide impacts. Final Report. Report by the Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
31. Denham, C., and I. White. 1998. Difference in urban and rural Britain. Population Trends 91:23-34.
32. Department for Education and Skills. 2001. Statistics of Education:Public Examinations GCSE/GNVQ and GCE/AGNVQ in England 2000. London: Department for Education and Skills (see www.dfes.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/VOL/v000279/vol02-2001.pdf).
33. Department for Education and Skills. 2005. Higher Standards:Better Schools for All. More Choice for Parents and Pupils (CM 6677). London: TSO.
34. Department for Education and Skills. 2006a. Care Matters: Transforming Lives of Children and Young People in Care (CM 6932). London: TSO.
35. Department for Education and Skills. 2006b. GCSE and Equivalent Results and Associated Value Added Measures in England, 2004/05 (Final). London:Department for Education and Skills (see www.dfes.gov. uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000664).
36. Department of Health. 2003. Building on the Best: Choice, Responsiveness and Equity in the NHS. London: TSO.
37. Department of Health. 2005a. Chief Executive's Report to the NHS: December 2005. London: Department of Health.
38. Department of Health. 2005b. Expert Patients Programme: Internal Evaluation. London: Department of Health (see www.expertpatients. nhs.uk/public/cms/uploads/evaluation%20headlines %20140605%20final.pdf).
39. Department of Health. 2005c. Independence, Well-Being and Choice: Our Vision for the Future of Adult Social Care in England. The Social Care Green Paper. London: TSO.
40. Department of Health. 2006. Better Care for Patients: ISTCs-The Story So Far. London: Department of Health.
41. Diamond, P. 2006. Efficiency, Public Virtue and the Delivery of World-Class Public Services. London: Policy Network.
42. Disney, R., J. Haskel and Y. Heden. 2003. Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing. Economic Journal 113:666-94.
43. Dixon, A., and J. Le Grand. 2006. Is greater patient choice consistent with equity? The case of the English NHS. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 11:162-66.
44. Dixon, A., and S. Thomson. 2006. Choices in health care: the European experience. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 11:167-71.
45. Dixon, A., J. Le Grand, J. Henderson, R. Murray and E. Poliakoff. 2003. Is the NHS equitable? LSE Health and Social Care Discussion Paper 11, London School of Economics.
46. Dixon, A., J. Le Grand, J. Henderson, R. Murray and E. Poliakoff. Forthcoming. Is the British National Health Service equitable? The evidence on socio-economic differences in utilisation. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, in press.
47. Enthoven, A. C. 1985. Reflections on the Management of the National Health Service: An American Looks at Incentives to Efficiency in Health Services Management in the UK. London:Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.
48. Enthoven, A. C. 1999. In Pursuit of an Improving National Health Service. London: The Nuffield Trust.
49. Enthoven, A. C. 2002 Introducing Market Forces into Health Care: A Tale of Two Countries. London: The Nuffield Trust.
50. Enthoven, A. C. 2006. Connecting consumer choice to the healthcare system. Journal of Health Law 39:289-305.
51. Farrington-Douglas, J., and J. Allen. 2005. Equitable Choices. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
52. Fiske, E. B., and H. F. Ladd. 2000. When Schools Compete: A CautionaryTale.Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
53. Foster, L., R. Brown, B. Phillips, J. Schore and B. Lepidus Carlson. 2003. Improving the quality of Medicaid personal assistance through consumer direction. Health Affairs (web exclusive) W3:162-75 (see http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/hlthaff.w3.162v1.pdf, accessed 28 September 2006).
54. Fotaki, M., A. Boyd, L. Smith, R. McDonald, A. Edwards, G. Elwyn, M. Roland and R. Sheaff. 2006. Patient Choice and the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Scoping Review. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery Organisation (NCCSDO). London:SDO.
55. Gaynor, M. 2006. What do we know about competition and quality in health care markets.NBERWorking Paper 12301. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
56. General Medical Council. 2006. Duties of a Doctor. London:General Medical Council.
57. Gibbons, S., and S. Machin. 2005. Paying for primary schools:supply constraints, popularity or congestion. Paper Presented to the Royal Economic Society Annual Conference, University of Nottingham.
58. Gibbons, S., and O. Silva. 2006. Faith Primary Schools: Better Schools or Better Pupils? London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science.
59. Gibbons, S., S. Machin and O. Silva. 2006. Competition, Choice and Pupil Achievement. London: Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics and Political Science.
60. Glasby, J. Forthcoming. Understanding Health and Social Care. Bristol: Policy Press.
61. Glasby, J., and F. Hasler. 2004. A healthy option? Direct payments and the implications for health care. Discussion Document, National Centre for Independent Living and the University of Birmingham Health Service Management Centre.
62. Glasby, J., and R. Littlechild. 2002. SocialWork and Direct Payments. Bristol: Policy Press.
63. Glendinning, C., S. Halliwell, S. Jacobs, K. Rummery and J. Tyrer. 2000. Bridging the gap: using direct payments to purchase integrated care. Health and Social Care in the Community 8:192-200.
64. Goodwin, N. 1998. GPfund-holding. In Learning fromtheNHS Internal Market (ed. J. Le Grand, N. Mays and J.-A. Mulligan). London: Kings Fund.
65. Gorard, S., J. Fitz and C. Taylor. 2003. Schools, Markets and Choice Policies. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
66. Greene, J. P., and M.A.Winters. 2004. Competition passes the test. Education Next 4:66-71.
67. Hannah, G., C. Dey and D. Power. 2006. Trust and distrust in network-style organisation: GPs' experiences and views of a Scottish local healthcare co-operative. Accounting Forum 30:377-88.
68. Hasler, F. 2003. Clarifying the Evidence on Direct Payments into Practice. London: National Centre for Independent Living (NCIL).
69. Hauck, K., and A. Street. Forthcoming. Do targets matter? A comparison of English and Welsh national health priorities. Health Economics, in press.
70. Hibbard, J. 2003. Engaging healthcare consumers to improve the quality of care. Medical Care 41 (Supplement):I-61-I-70.
71. Hibbard, J., and E. Peters. 2003. Supporting informed consumer health decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annual Review of Public Health 24:413-33.
72. Hirschman, A. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA:Havard University Press.
73. House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee. 2005. Choice, Voice and Public Services (HC 49-1). London:TSO.
74. Hoxby, C. M. 1994. Do private schools provide competition for public schools? NBER Working Paper 4978, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA.
75. Hoxby, C. M. 2002. Howschool choice affects the achievement of public school students. In Choice with Equity (ed. P. Hill). Stanford, CA: Hoover Press.
76. Hoxby, C. M. 2003. School choice and school productivity (or, is school choice a rising tide that lifts all boats?). In The Economic Analysis of School Choice (ed. C. M. Hoxby). University of Chicago Press.
77. Hoxby, C. M. 2005. Competition among public schools: a reply to Rothstein (2005). NBER Working Paper 11216, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
78. Hughes-Hallet, T. 2005. At home, with cats, kids and morphine. The Guardian, July 7.
79. Joseph, C., H. Lowry, J. Rafferty, S. Barber and V. Dseagu. 2006. Supporting Patient Choice: Learning from Stakeholders. Manchester: NHS Northwest Strategic Health Authority and the Council for Ethnic Minority Voluntary Sector Organisations.
80. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 2004. Making Direct Payments Work for Older People. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
81. Kennedy, A., C. Gately, A. Rogers and the EPP Evaluation Team. 2005. Process Evaluation of the EPP Report II:Examination of the Implementation of the Expert Patients Programme within the Structure and Locality Contexts of the NHS in England (PREPP Study). Manchester: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre.
82. Klein, R. 2005. The great transformation. Health Economics, Policy and Law 1:91-98 (reprinted in the 2006 paperback edition of Le Grand (2003)).
83. Lamont, E., D. Hayreh, K. Pickett, J. Dignam, M. List, K. Stenson, D. Harat, B. Brockstein, S. Sellargren and E. Vokes. 2003. Is patient travel distance associated with survival on phase II clinical trials in oncology? Journal of the National Cancer Institute 95:1370-75.
84. Lauder, H., and D. Hughes. 1999. Trading in Futures: Why Markets in Education Don't Work. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
85. Leece, J., and J. Bornat (eds). 2006. Developments in Direct Payments. Bristol: The Policy Press.
86. Le Grand, J. 1984. Equity as an economic objective. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1:39-51.
87. Le Grand, J. 1989. Markets, equality and welfare. In Market Socialism (ed. J. Le Grand and S. Estrin). Oxford University Press.
88. Le Grand, J. 1991. Equity and Choice:AnEssay in Economics and Applied Philosophy. London: Harper Collins Academic.
89. Le Grand, J. 2002. The Labour Government and the National Health Service. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18:137-53.
90. Le Grand, J. 2003. Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens. Oxford University Press (paperback edition published in 2006).
91. Le Grand, J., and W. Bartlett (eds). 1993. Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. Houndmills: Macmillan.
92. Le Grand, J., N. Mays and J.-A. Mulligan (eds). 1998. Learning from the Internal Market: A Review of the Evidence. London:Kings Fund.
93. Lent, A., and N. Arend. 2004. Making Choices: How Can Choice Improve Local Public Services? London: New Local Government Network.
94. Levačić, R. 2004. Competition and the performance of English secondary schools: further evidence. Education Economics 12:177-93.
95. Levett, R., with I. Christie, M. Jacobs and R. Therivel. 2003. A Better Choice of Choice. London: Fabian Society.
96. Lewis, R., A. Alvarez-Rosete and N. Mays. 2006. How to Regulate Health Care in England: An International Perspective. London: Kings Fund
97. Lipsey, D. 2005. Too much choice. Prospect 117 (December).
98. Machin, S., and S. McNally. 2004. The Literacy Hour. London:Centre for the Economics of Education.
99. Marquand, D. 2004. Decline of the Public: The Hollowing Out of Citizenship. Cambridge: Polity Press.
100. Marshall, M., P. Shekelle, S. Leatherman and R. Brook. 2000. The public release of performance data. What do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. Journal of the American Medical Association 283:1866-74.
101. Martikainen, T., and S. Frediksson. 2006. Vaalit ja politiikka ['Elections and politics']. City of Helsinki, Urban Facts. Research Publications 5/2006. Helsinki.
102. Mayer, R., J. Davis and F. Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20:709-34.
103. Milligan, C., C.Woodcock and A. Burton. 2006. Turning Medicaid Beneficiaries into Purchasers for Health Care: Critical Success Factors for Medicaid Consumer-Directed Purchasing. Washington, DC: Academy Health.
104. MORI. 2005. Survey of 2000 adults in Great Britain 18+. London:IPSOS MORI.
105. National Birthday Trust. 1997. Home Births-The Report of the 1994 Confidential Enquiry. Carnforth: Parthenon.
106. NHS Confederation. 2003. Fair for All, Personal to You: The NHS Confederation Response to the Choice Consultation. London:NHS Confederation.
107. Noden, P.,A.West, M. David and A. Edge. 1998. Choices and destinations at transfer to secondary schools in London. Journal of Education Policy 13:221-36.
108. O'Shaughnessy, J., and C. Leslie. 2005. More Good School Places. London: Policy Exchange.
109. Page, B. 2004. The impact on public expectation. In Patient Power: The Impact of Patient Choice on the Future NHS (ed. M. Mythen and T. Coffey). London: New Health Network.
110. Palmer, K. 2005. How Should We Deal with Hospital Failure:Facing the Challenges of the New NHS Market. London: Kings Fund.
111. Pfizer/MORI Health Choice Index. 2005. Public opinion on choice in out of hospital care (December 2005; see www. ipsos-mori.com/polls/2005/pdf/hci051028.pdf).
112. Pinker, R. 1971. Social Theory and Social Policy. London: Heinemann.
113. Pinker, R. 1979. The Idea of Welfare. London: Heinemann.
114. Pinker, R. 2006. From gift relationships to public policy: an odyssey along the policy paths of altruism and egoism. Social Policy and Administration 40:10-25 (reprinted in the 2006 paperback edition of Le Grand (2003)).
115. Pollock, A. 2005. NHS plc: The Privatisation of Our Health Care. London: Verso.
116. Porter, M., and E. Teisberg. 2006. Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
117. Prabhakar, R. 2006. Rethinking Public Services. Houndmills:Palgrave Macmillan.
118. Preker, A., and A. Harding. 2002. Innovations in Health Service Delivery: The Corporatization of Public Hospitals. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
119. Prime Minister's Strategy Unit (PMSU). 2005. Improving the Life Chances of Disabled People. London: PMSU.
120. Prime Minister's Strategy Unit (PMSU). 2006a. School Reform:A Survey of Recent International Experience. London: PMSU.
121. Prime Minister's Strategy Unit (PMSU). 2006b. TheUKgovernment's approach to public service reform. Discussion paper, PMSU.
122. Propper, C., S. Burgess and K. Green. 2004. Does competition between hospitals improve the quality of care? Hospital death rates and the NHS internal market. Journal of Public Economics 88:1247-72.
123. Propper, C., D.Wilson and S. Burgess. 2006. Extending choice in English health care: the implications of the economic evidence. Journal of Social Policy 35:537-57.
124. Raham, H. 2002. Decentralization and Choice in Sweden's School System: Policy Lessons for Canada. Kelowna, BC: Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education.
125. Rankin, J. 2005. A good choice for mental health. Mental Health in the Mainstream, Working Paper 3, Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
126. Rothstein, J. 2005. Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? A comment on Hoxby. NBERWorking Paper 11,215, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
127. Scheffler, R. 1989. Adverse selection: the Achilles heel of the NHS reforms. The Lancet 1:950-52.
128. Schultze, C. 1977. The Private Use of Public Interest. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
129. Schwappach, D., and C. Koeck. 2004. Preferences for disclosure:the case of bedside rationing. Social Science and Medicine 59:1891-97.
130. Schwartz, B. 2004. The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. New York: HarperCollins.
131. Smith, A. 1776/1964. The Wealth of Nations, Everyman's Library. London: Dent.
132. Soderstrom, M., and R. Uusitalo. 2005. School choice and segregation:evidence from an admissions reform. Working Paper 2005:7, Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU) (see www.ifau.se/upload/pdf/se/2005/wp05-07.pdf, accessed 28 September 2006).
133. Spiers, J. 2003. Patients, Power and Responsibility. Abingdon:Radcliffe Medical Press.
134. Stevens, S. 2004. Reform strategies for the English NHS. Health Affairs 23:37-44.
135. Sutton Trust. 2005. No More School Run. London: Social Market Foundation, Policy Exchange, Sutton Trust.
136. Swedish National Agency of Education. 2003. School choice and its effects in Sweden: a summary. Report 230, Lenanders Grafiska AB, Kalmar.
137. Taylor,D. 2004.Valuing Choice: Dying at Home. London: Marie Curie Cancer Care.
138. Thomas, S., and R. Oates. 2005. The Parent Factor Report Four:Access to Education. Auckland: The Maxim Institute.
139. Titmuss, R. 1997. The Gift Relationship (new edition edited by A. Oakley and J. Ashton). London School of Economics. (First edition published in 1970.)
140. Tomkins, C. 2001. Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks. Accounting Organisations and Society 26:161-91.
141. Turner, G.-M. 2005. Consumerism in Health Care: Early Evidence Is Positive. Alexandra, VA: The Galen Institute.
142. Van Beusekon, I., S. Tonshoff, H. DeVries, C. Spreng and E. B. Keeler. 2004. Possibility or Utopia? Consumer Choice in Health Care: A Literature Review. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
143. Vickers, J., and G. Yarrow. 1988. Privatization: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
144. Waslander, S., and M. Thrupp. 1995. Choice, competition and segregation: an empirical analysis of a New Zealand secondary education market 1990-1993. Journal of Education Policy 10:1-26.
145. Weale, A. 1983. Political Theory and Social Policy. London:Macmillan.
146. West, A., and A. Hind. Forthcoming. School choice in London, England: characteristics of students in different types of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, in press.
147. West, A., and H. Pennell. 2003. Underachievement in Schools. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
148. West, A., A. Hind and H. Pennell. 2004. School admissions and 'selection' in comprehensive schools: policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education 30:347-69.
149. Which? 2005. Choice: can the government's choice agenda deliver for consumers (see www.which.co.uk/files/application/pdf/0503choice:rep-445-55216.pdf, accessed 28 September 2006).
150. Williams, J., and A. Rossiter (eds). 2004. Choice: The Evidence. London: Social Market Foundation.
151. Witcher, S., K. Stalker, M. Roadburg and C. Jones. 2000. Direct payments; the impact on choice and control for disabled people. Central Research Unit, Scottish Executive (see www.scotland.gov.uk/cru/documents/dpdp-00. asp, accessed 28 September 2006).
152. Witte, J. 1997. Achievement effects of the Milwaukee Public School Voucher Program. Paper presented to The American Economics Association Annual Meeting, 3-6 January 1997 (see http://dpls.dacc.wisc.edu/choice/aea97.html, accessed 28 September 2006).
153. Wood, C. 2005. Making Choice a Reality in Secondary Education. London: Social Market Foundation.