Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: An Australian single-surgeon series

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 154-158

  Papachristos, Alexander ^a   Basto, Marnique ^b,c   te Marvelde, Luc ^b   Moon, Daniel ^a,b,d  

^a ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b PETER MACCALLUM CANCER CENTRE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d EPWORTH HEALTHCARE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

AGED; AUSTRALIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AUSTRALIA; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84923957966     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ans.12602     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Walsh PC. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J. Urol. 1982; 128: 492-497.
2. Duthie JLA, O'Connor K, Tan L, Moon DA, Costello AJ, Murphy D. Growth trends and adoption of robotic-assisted surgery across Australia and New Zealand: current status in 2013. BJU Int. 2013; 111 (Suppl. 1): 20.
3. Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE etal. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 418-430.
4. Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC etal. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 405-417.
5. Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S etal. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 382-404.
6. Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC etal. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 431-452.
7. Hellawell GO, Moon DA. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: reducing the learning curve. Urology 2008; 72: 1347-1350.
8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240: 205-213.
9. Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F etal. Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J. Sex. Med. 2011; 8: 1503-1512.
10. Evans SM, Millar JL, Frydenberg M etal. Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer Registry. BJU Int. 2014; doi: 10.1111/bju.12509.
11. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA etal. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 1-15.
12. Cho JW, Kim TH, Sung GT. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's experience. Korean J. Urol. 2009; 50: 1198-1202.
13. Lee HW, Lee HM, Seo SI. Comparison of initial surgical outcomes between laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon. Korean J. Urol. 2009; 50: 468-474.
14. Trabulsi EJ, Zola JC, Gomella LG, Lallas CD. Transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon institutional evolution. Urol Oncol. 2010; 28: 81-85.
15. Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Fleischmann A etal. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy-does it have an impact on urinary continence? J. Urol. 2006; 176: 189-195.
16. Tewari AK, Ali A, Metgud S etal. Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing. World J. Urol. 2013; 31: 471-480.
17. Penson DF, Nelson CJ. The impact of prostate cancer diagnosis and post-treatment sexual dysfunction on quality of life. In: Mulhall JP (ed.). Sexual Function in the Prostate Cancer Patient. New York: Humana Press, 2009; 17-32.