Prospects and challenges for fungal metatranscriptomics of complex communities

Fungal Ecology

Volumn 14, Issue , 2015, Pages 133-137

  Kuske, Cheryl R ^a   Hesse, Cedar N ^a   Challacombe, Jean F ^a   Cullen, Daniel ^b   Herr, Joshua R ^c   Mueller, Rebecca C ^a   Tsang, Adrian ^d   Vilgalys, Rytas ^e  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c Michigan State University ^*  (United States)

^d Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental RNA; Fungal metabolism; Fungal transcriptome; K mer; Metatranscriptome; Sequence databases

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923952144     PISSN: 17545048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.12.005     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Brune A. Symbiotic digestion of lignocellulose in termite guts. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2014, 12(3):168-180.
2. Desai N., Antonopoulos D., Gilbert J.A., Glass E.M., Meyer F. From genomics to metagenomics. Current Opinion In Biotechnology 2012, 23:72-76.
3. Griffiths R.I., Whiteley A.S., O'Donnell A.G., Bailey M.J. Rapid method for coextraction of DNA and RNA from natural environments for analysis of ribosomal DNA-and rRNA-based microbial community composition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2000, 66:5488-5491.
4. Hori C., Ishida T., Igarashi K., Samejima M., Suzuki H., Master E., et al. Analysis of the Phlebiopsis gigantea genome, transcriptome and secretome provides insight into its pioneer colonization strategies of wood. PLOS Genetics 2014, 10(12):e1004759.
5. Larsen P.E., Sreedasyam A., Trivedi G., Podila G.K., Cseke L.J., Collart F.R. Using next generation transcriptome sequencing to predict an ectomycorrhizal metabolome. BMC Systems Biology 2011, 5:70-84.
6. Lee S.S., Ha J.K., Cheng K. Relative contributions of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi to invitro degradation of orchard grass cell walls and their interactions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2000, 66(9):3807-3813.
7. Liao H.L., Chen Y., Bruns T.D., Peay K.G., Taylor J.W., Branco S., et al. Metatranscriptomic analysis of ectomycorrhizal roots reveal genes associated with Piloderma-Pinus symbiosis: improved methodologies for assessing gene expression in situ. Environmental Microbiology 2014, 10.1111/1462-2920.12619.
8. Lombard V., Ramulu H.G., Drula E., Coutinho P.M., Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Research 2013, 42:D490-D495.
9. Mueller R.S., Pan C. Sample handling and mass spectrometry for microbial metaproteomic analyses. Methods in Enzymology 2013, 531:289-303.
10. Qi M., Wang P., O'Toole N., Barboza P.S., Ungerfeld E., Leigh M.B., et al. Snapshot of the eukaryotic gene expression in muskoxen rumen - a metatranscriptomic approach. PLoS One 2011, 6(5):e20521.
11. Thomas T., Gilbert J., Meyer F. Metagenomics - a guide from sampling to data analysis. Microbial Informatics and Experimentation 2012, 2:3.
12. Tisserant E., Kohler A., Dozolme-Seddas P., Balestrini R., Benabdella K., Colard A., et al. The transcriptome of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices (DAOM 197198) reveals functional tradeoffs in an obligate symbiont. New Phytologist 2012, 193:755-769.
13. Tveit A., Schwacke R., Svenning M.M., Urich T. Organic carbon transformations in high-Arctic peat soils: key functions and microorganisms. ISME Journal 2013, 7:299-311.
14. 2 and nitrogen fertilization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2012, 78:3950-3957.
15. Wooley J.C., Ye Y. Metagenomics: facts and artifacts, and computational challenges. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 2010, 25(1):71-81.