Reliability and validity of the anesthesiologist supervision instrument when certified registered nurse anesthetists provide scores

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 214-219

  Dexter, Franklin ^a   Masursky, Danielle ^b   Hindman, Bradley J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b Department of Anesthesia University of Iowa ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL SUPERVISION; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DE OLIVEIRA FILHO SUPERVISION INSTRUMENT; FACE VALIDITY; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; NURSE ANESTHETIST; POSTANESTHESIA CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; ANESTHESIOLOGY; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; NURSE ANESTHETISTS; ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84923933639     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: 15267598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000510     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Shumway SH, Del Risco J. A comparison of nurse anesthesia practice types. AANA J 2000;68:452-62
2. Taylor CL. Attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration in anesthesia. AANA J 2009;77:343-8
3. de Oliveira Filho GR, Dal Mago AJ, Garcia JH, Goldschmidt R. An instrument designed for faculty supervision evaluation by anesthesia residents and its psychometric properties. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1316-22
4. Hindman BJ, Dexter F, Kreiter CD, Wachtel RE. Determinants, associations, and psychometric properties of resident evaluations of faculty operating room supervision in a US anesthesia residency program. Anesth Analg 2013;116:1342-51
5. Dexter F, Logvinov II, Brull SJ. Anesthesiology residents' and nurse anesthetists' perceptions of effective clinical faculty supervision by anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 2013;116:1352-5
6. Dexter F, Ledolter J, Smith TC, Griffiths D, Hindman BJ. Influence of provider type (nurse anesthetist or resident physician), staff assignments, and other covariates on daily evaluations of anesthesiologists' quality of supervision. Anesth Analg 2014;119:670-8
7. Dexter F, Ledolter J, Hindman BJ. Bernoulli cumulative sum (CUSUM) control charts for monitoring of anesthesiologists' performance in supervising anesthesia residents and nurse anesthetists. Anesth Analg 2014;119:679-85
8. Paoletti X, Marty J. Consequences of running more operating theatres than anaesthetists to staff them: a stochastic simulation study. Br J Anaesth 2007;98:462-9
9. Epstein RH, Dexter F. Influence of supervision ratios by anesthesiologists on first-case starts and critical portions of anesthetics. Anesthesiology 2012;116:683-91
10. De Oliveira GS Jr, Rahmani R, Fitzgerald PC, Chang R, McCarthy RJ. The association between frequency of selfreported medical errors and anesthesia trainee supervision: a survey of United States anesthesiology residents-in-Training. Anesth Analg 2013;116:892-7
11. de Oliveira Filho GR, Dexter F. Interpretation of the association between frequency of self-reported medical errors and faculty supervision of anesthesiology residents. Anesth Analg 2013;116:752-3
12. De Oliveira GS Jr, Dexter F, Bialek JM, McCarthy RJ. Reliability and validity of assessing subspecialty level of faculty anesthesiologists' supervision of anesthesiology residents. Anesth Analg 2015;120:209-13
13. Hindman BJ, Dexter F, Smith TC. Anesthesia residents' global (departmental) evaluation of faculty anesthesiologists' supervision can be less than their average evaluations of individual anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 2015;120:204-8
14. Dexter F, Marcon E, Epstein RH, Ledolter J. Validation of statistical methods to compare cancellation rates on the day of surgery. Anesth Analg 2005;101:465-73
15. Neuendorf KA. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2002:11, 13, 23, 116, 129