Transcatheter Reduction of Paravalvular Leaks: ASystematic Review and Meta-analysis

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 260-269

  Millán, Xavier ^a   Skaf, Sabah ^a   Joseph, Lawrence ^b   Ruiz, Carlos ^c   García, Eulogio ^d   Smolka, Grzegorz ^e   Noble, Stéphane ^f   Cruz González, Ignacio ^g   Arzamendi, Dabit ^h   Serra, Antoni ^h   Kliger, Chad ^c   Sia, Ying Tung ⁱ   Asgar, Anita ^a   Ibrahim, Réda ^a   Jolicœur, E Marc ^a  

^a MONTREAL HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^c LENOX HILL HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^e MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^f UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^g HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE SALAMANCA   (Spain)

^h UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

ⁱ CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; EMBASE; HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA; HUMAN; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASS; PARAVALVULAR LEAK; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SURGICAL RISK; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANEMIA, HEMOLYTIC; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEART FAILURE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; MITRAL VALVE; MORTALITY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; SURGERY; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANEMIA, HEMOLYTIC; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEART FAILURE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MITRAL VALVE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84923913847     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.12.012     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Jilaihawi H., Kashif M., Fontana G., et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. JAm Coll Cardiol 2012, 59:1275-1286.
2. O'Rourk D.J., Palac R.T., Malenka D.J., et al. Outcome of mild periprosthetic regurgitation detected by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. JAm Coll Cardiol 2001, 38:163-166.
3. Cancer Survival in England: Patients Diagnosed 2005-2009 and Followed Up to 2010 2011, Office for National Statistics, Office for National Statistics, London.
4. Exposito V., Garcia-Camarero T., Bernal J.M., et al. Repeat mitral valve replacement: 30-years' experience. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009, 62:929-932.
5. De Almeida-Brandão C.M., Pomerantzeff P.M., Souza L.R., et al. Multivariate analysis of risk factorsfor hospital mortality in valvular reoperations for prosthetic valve dysfunction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002, 22:922-926.
6. Emery R.W., Krogh C.C., McAdams S., Emery A.M., Holter A.R. Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St Jude medical prosthesis. JHeart Valve Dis 2010, 19:473-484.
7. Potter D.D., Sundt T.M., Zehr K.J., et al. Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2004, 78:67-72.
8. Akins C.W., Bitondo J.M., Hilgenberg A.D., et al. Early and late results of the surgical correction of cardiac prosthetic paravalvular leaks. JHeart Valve Dis 2005, 14:792-799.
9. Hourihan M., Perry S.B., Mandell V.S., et al. Transcatheter umbrella closure of valvular and paravalvular leaks. JAm Coll Cardiol 1992, 20:1371-1377.
10. Alonso-Briales J.H., Munoz-Garcia A.J., Jimenez-Navarro M.F., et al. Closure of perivalvular leaks using an Amplatzer occluder. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009, 62:442-446.
11. Boccuzzi G.G., De Rosa C., Scrocca I., et al. Percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leak: single center experience. JClin Exp Cardiol 2013, S3:7.
12. Cortes M., Garcia E., Garcia-Fernandez M.A., et al. Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in percutaneous transcatheter repairs of paravalvular mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2008, 101:382-386.
13. Cruz-Gonzalez I., Rama-Merchan J.C., Arribas-Jimenez A., et al. Paravalvular leak closure with the Amplatzer Vascular Plug III device: immediate and short-term results. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2014, 67:608-614.
14. Garcia-Borbolla Fernandez R., Sancho-Jaldon M., CallePerez G., et al. Percutaneous treatment of mitral valve periprosthetic leakage. An alternative to highrisk surgery?. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009, 62:438-441.
15. Hein R., Wunderlich N., Robertson G., Wilson N., Sievert H. Catheter closure of paravalvular leak. EuroIntervention 2006, 2:318-325.
16. Krishnaswamy A., Kapadia S.R., Tuzcu E.M. Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure- imaging, techniques and outcomes. Circ J 2013, 77:19-27.
17. Mookadam F., Raslan S.F., Jiamsripong P., Jalal U., Murad M.H. Percutaneous closure of mitral paravalvular leaks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JHeart Valve Dis 2012, 21:208-217.
18. Nietlispach F., Johnson M., Moss R.R., et al. Transcatheter closure of paravalvular defects using a purpose specific occluder. JAm Coll Cardiol Interv 2010, 3:759-765.
19. Noble S., Jolicoeur E.M., Basmadjian A., et al. Percutaneous paravalvular leak reduction: procedural and long-term clinical outcomes. Can J Cardiol 2013, 29:1422-1428.
20. Pate G.E., Al Zubaidi A., Chandavimol M., et al. Percutaneous closure of prosthetic paravalvular leaks: case series and review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006, 68:528-533.
21. Ruiz C.E., Jelnin V., Kronzon I., et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. JAm Coll Cardiol 2011, 58:2210-2217.
22. Shapira Y., Hirsch R., Kornowski R., et al. Percutaneous closure of perivalvular leaks with Amplatzer occluders: feasibility, safety, and short-term results. JHeart Valve Dis 2007, 16:305-313.
23. Smolka G., Pysz P., Wojakowski W., et al. Clinical manifestations of heart failure abate with transcatheter aortic paravalvular leak closure using Amplatzer Vascular Plug II and III devices. JInvasive Cardiol 2013, 25:226-231.
24. Smolka G., Pysz P., Jasinski M., et al. Transapical closure of mitral paravalvular leaks with use of amplatzer Vascular Plug III. JInvasive Cardiol 2013, 25:497-501.
25. Sorajja P., Cabalka A.K., Hagler D.J., Rihal C.S. Long-term follow-up of percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation. JAm Coll Cardiol 2011, 58:2218-2224.
26. Swaans M.J., Post M.C., van der Ven H.A., et al. Transapical treatment of paravalvular leaks in patients with a logistic euroscore of more than 15%: acute and 3-month outcomes of a "proof of concept" study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012, 79:741-747.
27. Jüni P., Altman D.G., Egger M. Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001, 323:42-46.
28. von Elm E., Altman D.G., Egger M., et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. Ann Intern Med 2007, 147:573-577.
29. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, etal. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available at:. Accessed May 15, 2014. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm.
30. Downs S.H., Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. JEpidemiol Community Health 1998, 52:377-384.
31. Reeves BC, Higgins JP, Wells GA. Chapter 13: including non-randomized studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at:. Accessed May 15, 2014. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
32. Stroup D.F., Berlin J.A., Morton S.C., et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000, 283:2008-2012.
33. Moher D., Cook D.J., Eastwood S., et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999, 354:1896-1900.
34. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:264-269.
35. Freixa X., Belle L., Joseph L., et al. Immediate vs. delayed stenting in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurointervention 2013, 8:1207-1216.
36. Kliger C., Ruiz C.E. Rethinking percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: where do we go from here?. Rev Esp Cardiol 2014, 67:593-596.
37. Banai S., Verheye S., Cheung A., et al. Trans apical mitral implantation (TAMI) of the Tiara TM Bio-prosthesis: pre-clinical results. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014, 7:154-162.
38. Généreux P., Head S.J., Hahn R., et al. Paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the new Achilles' heel? A comprehensive review of the literature. JAm Coll Cardiol 2013, 61:1125-1136.
39. Leon M.B., Smith C.R., Mack M., et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. NEngl J Med 2010, 363:1597-1607.
40. Smith C.R., Leon M.B., Mack M.J., et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. NEngl J Med 2011, 364:2187-2198.