Educational concept maps: A knowledge based aid for instructional design

Proceedings: DMS 2011 - 17th International Conference on Distributed Multimedia Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 234-237

  Adorni, Giovanni ^a   Coccoli, Mauro ^a   Vivanet, Giuliano ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Instructional Authoring Systems; Instructional design; Knowledge representation; Topic Maps

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGY; REUSABILITY; TEACHING;

AUTHORING SYSTEMS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNS; KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION; ONTOLOGICAL STRUCTURES; PEDAGOGICAL STRATEGIES; TOPIC MAPS;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 84923902518     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. [1] Merrill, M. D. (2002). Knowledge objects and mental models. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects (pp. 261-280). Washington DC: Agency for Instructional Technology & Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
2. [2] Ohlsson, S. (1987). Some principles of intelligent tutoring. In Lawler, R.W., and Masoud Yazdani, M. (eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Education: Learning Environments and Tutorial Systems v. 1, Intellect Books.
3. [3] Koper, R. (2001). Modelling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical metamodel behind EML. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland. Retrieved from http://dspace.learningnetworks.org/handle/1820/36?mode=simple
4. [4] Merrill, M. D. (2002a). First Principles of Instruction. ETR&D, Vol. 50(3), 43-49.
5. [5] Gagne, R. M. and Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of Instructional Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6. [6] Ausubel D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York, Grune and Stratton.
7. [7] Adorni, G., Brondo, D., Vivanet, G. (2009). A formal instructional model based on Concept Maps. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, Vol. 5(3), 33-43.
8. [8] Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovitch, P. J., and Anderson, J. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: advanced knowledge acquisition in illstructured domains. Patel, V. (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. ISO13250 (2003). ISO/IEC 13250:2003: Information Technology - Document Description and Processing Languages - Topic Maps. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH. Retrieved from http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/document/0322_files/iso13250-2nd-ed-v2.pdf
10. [10] Pepper, S. and Moore, G. (2001). XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0. Retrieved from http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0
11. [11] Pepper, S. (1999). Navigating Haystacks, Discovering Needles. Markup Languages: Theory and Practice, Vol. 1(4), MIT Press.
12. [12] Ontopia (2002), Learn more about topic maps. Retrieved from http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/learn_more.html
13. [13] Adorni, G., Coccoli, M., Vercelli, G., Vivanet, G. (2008). Semantic authoring of learning paths with Topic Maps. In Proceedings of DMS 2008, the 14th International Conference on Distributed Multimedia Systems, Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, ISBN/ISSN: 1- 891706-23-3, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A., Sept. 4-6, 2008.