Fossil fuels consumption evaluation in blast furnace technology based on different life cycle impact assessment methods

METAL 2012 - Conference Proceedings, 21st International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1709-1714

  Burchart Korol, Dorota ^a  

^a CENTRAL MINING INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Environmental assessment; Fossil fuels; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA); Pig iron production

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE FUELS; BLAST FURNACES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CUMULATIVE ENERGY DEMANDS; CUMULATIVE EXERGIES; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; IRON PRODUCTION; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY; NON-RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 84923899974     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Burchart-Korol D: Significance of Environmental LCA Method in the Iron and Steel Industry, Metalurgija 50 (2011) 3, pp. 205-208
2. Burchart-Korol D., Evaluation of Environmental Impacts in Iron-Making based on Life Cycle Assessment, METAL 2011:20th Anniversary International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials. Ostrava: TANGER, 2011, pp. 1246-1252.
3. 2Reduction Potentials by Utilizing Waste Plastics in Steel Works, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, nr 14, 2009, p. 122
4. Goedkoop M, Oele M., Schryver A., Vieira M.: SimaPro Database Manual Methods library, PRé Consultants, the Netherlands, May 2008
5. Goedkoop M., Spriensma R.: The Eco-indicator 99 A Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Methodology Report PRé Consultants B. V. 2000
6. Deutscher V.: VDI-richtlinie 4600: Cumulative Energy Demand, Terms, Definitions, Methods of Calculation; Verein Deutscher Ingenieure: Düseldorf, 1997.
7. Frischknecht R., Jungbluth N., Althaus H. J., Doka G., Dones R., Hischier R., Hellweg S., Humbert S., Margni M., Nemecek T., Spielmann M.: Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods: Data v2.0. ecoinvent report No. 3, Swiss centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland 2007.
8. Bösch M. E., Hellweg S., Huijbregts M. A. J., Frischknecht R.: Applying Cumulative Energy Demand (CExD) Indicators to the Ecoinvent Database. In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12 (3) (2007) pp. 181-190.
9. Goedkoop M., Heijungs R., Huijbregts M., Schryver A., Struijs J., Zelm R.: ReCiPe 2008: A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level: First edition, Report I: Characterisation, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (VROM), The Netherlands, 2009.
10. The ReCiPe methodology, http://www.lcia-recipe.net/, March 2011.
11. Golak S., Burchart-Korol D., Czaplicka-Kolarz K., Wieczorek T.: Application of Neural Network for the Prediction of Eco-efficiency. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, D. Liu et al. (Eds.): ISNN 2011, Part III, LNCS 6677, pp. 380-387, 2011 (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011).
12. Saniuk A., Saniuk S., Witkowski K., Using Activity Based Costing in the Metalworking Processes, In: METAL 2011 Conference proceedings, TANGER 2011, Ostrava, Czech Republic, EU, ISBN 978-80-87294-22-2.
13. Samolejová A., Feliks J., Lenort R., Besta P. A Hybrid Decision Support System for Iron Ore Supply. Metalurgija, vol. 51, no. 1, 2012, pp. 91-93. ISSN 0543-5846.
14. Špička I., Heger M., Franz J. The Mathematical-Physical Models and the Neural Network Exploitation for Time Prediction of Cooling Down Law Range Specimen. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, vol. 55, no. 3, 2010, pp. 921-926.