Demographic and obstetric outcomes of pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared to non-ART pregnancies

Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 16-20

  Johnston, Robert ^a   Fong, Alex ^b   Lovell, Sarah ^a   Sobolewski, Paul S ^c   Rad, Steve ^d   Turner, Aaron ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c OAKLAND UNIVERSITY WILLIAM BEAUMONT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

ART pregnancy; High risk pregnancies; IVF pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; FETUS GROWTH; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LABOR COMPLICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; PLACENTA PREVIA; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIOECONOMICS; SOLUTIO PLACENTAE; THYROID DISEASE;

EID: 84923857269     PISSN: 15175693     EISSN: 15180557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20150005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice, ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice, ACOG Committee on Genetics. ACOG Committee Opinion #324: Perinatal risks associated with assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1143-6.
2. Barton JR, Sibai AJ, Istwan NB, Rhea DJ, Desch CN, Sibai BM. Spontaneously conceived pregnancy after 40: in-fuence of age and obesity on outcome. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31:795-8.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2011 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report. 2013 Atlanta GA, 2013. Avaiable at: http://www.cdc.gov/art/ART2011.
4. Chambers GM, Sullivan EA, Ishihara O, Chapman MG, Ad-amson GD. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281-94.
5. Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: data from the National Survey of Family Growth. Natl Health Stat Report. 2013;67:1-18.
6. D’Angelo DV, Whitehead N, Helms K, Barfeld W, Ahluwalia IB. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:314-320.
7. Feinberg EC, Larsen FW, Catherino WH, Zhang J, Armstrong AY. Comparison of assisted reproductive technology utilization and outcomes between Caucasian and African American patients in an equal-access-to-care setting. Fertil Ster-il. 2006;85:888-94.
8. Fong A, Serra A, Herrero T, Pan D, Ogunyemi D. Pre-ges-tational versus gestational diabetes: a population based study on clinical and demographic differences. J Diabetes Complications. 2014;28:29-34.
9. Fujimoto VY, Luke B, Brown MB, Jain T, Armstrong A, Grainger DA, Hornstein MD. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:382-90.
10. Gilbert WM, Danielsen B. Pregnancy outcomes associated with intrauterine growth restriction Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1596-9.
11. Huddleston HG, Cedars MI, Sohn SH, Giudice LC, Fujimo-to VY. Racial and ethnic disparities in reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202: 413-9.
12. Luke B, Brown MB, Stern JE, Missmer SA, Fujimoto VY, Leach R. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology pregnancy and live birth rates within body mass index categories. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1661-6.
13. MacKay AP, Berg CJ, King JC, Duran C, Chang J. Pregnancy-related mortality among women with multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:563-8.
14. Merritt TA, Goldstein M, Philips R, Peverini R, Iwakoshi J, Rodriguez A, Oshiro B. Impact of ART on pregnancies in California: an analysis of maternity outcomes and insights into the added burden of neonatal intensive care. J Perina-tol. 2014;34:345-50.
15. Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. Patient discharge data public dataset. in Patient Discharge Data File Documentation. July 31 2012. Sacramento, CA. Avaiable at: http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/HID/Products/Pat-DischargeData/PublicDataSet/.
16. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:825-34.
17. Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Rebar RW, Tasca RJ. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:967-77.
18. Schmitt SK, Sneed L, Phibbs CS. Costs of newborn care in California: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2006;117:154-60.
19. Seifer DB, Frazier LM, Grainger DA. Disparity in assisted reproductive technologies outcomes in black women compared with white women Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1701-10.
20. Stephen EH, Chandra A. Declining estimates of infertility in the United States: 1982-2002. Fertil Steril. 2006;86: 516-23.
21. Sunderam S, Chang J, Flowers L, Kulkarni A, Sentelle G, Jeng G, Macaluso M. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009;58:1-25.
22. Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford S, Anderson JE, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Barfeld WD. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013;62:1-24.
23. Waldenström U, Aasheim V, Nilsen AB, Rasmussen S, Pet-tersson HJ, Schytt E. Adverse pregnancy outcomes related to advanced maternal age compared with smoking and being overweight. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:104-12.
24. Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, Jeng G. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003;52:1-16.
25. Yasmeen S, Romano PS, Schembri ME, Keyzer JM, Gilbert WM. Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:992-1001.