Bethesda system reporting rates for conventional Papanicolaou tests and liquid-based cytology in a large Chinese, College of American Pathologists-certified independent medical laboratory: Analysis of 1 394 389 Papanicolaou test reports

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 139, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 373-377

  Zheng, Baowen ^b   Austin, R Marshall ^a   Liang, Xiaoman ^b   Li, Zaibo ^a   Chen, Congde ^b   Yan, Shanshan ^b   Zhao, Chengquan ^a,b  

^a Kingmed Diagnostic Company   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHINA; CYTODIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATHOLOGY; STANDARDS; VAGINA SMEAR; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHINA; CYTODIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL; VAGINAL SMEARS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923854470     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: 15432165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0070-OA     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Ferlang J, Shin HR, Forman D, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of the worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893-2917.
2. Shi JF, Qiao YL, Pretroius R, et al. Epidemiology and prevention of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in China and Mongolia. Vaccine. 2008;26(suppl 12):M53-M59.
3. Li J, Kang LN, Qiao YL. Review of the cervical cancer disease burden in mainland China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(5):1149-1153.
4. Khetarpal S, Kamis S. Tracing the rise of KingMed and its future route: a correspondence with Hongbo Li. Asia-Pac Biotech News. 2012;16(6):20-38.
5. Pan QJ, Hu SY, Zhang X, et al. Pooled analysis of the performance of liquidbased cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(9):473-482.
6. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al; Forum Group Members; Bethesda 2001 Workshop. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2114-2119.
7. Eversole GM, Moriarty AT, Schwartz MR, et al. Practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in cervicovaginal cytology, 2006. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134(3):331-335.
8. Allen TC, Hammond MEH, Robboy SJ. Quality and the College of American Pathologists. Arch Path Lab Med. 2011;135(11):1441.
9. International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer. Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2006;120(4):885-891.
10. Vizcaino AP, Moreno V, Bosch FX, Muñoz N, Barros-Dios XM, Parkin DM. International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer, I: adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 1998;75(4):536-545.
11. Berstein SJ, Sanchez-Ramos L, Ndubisi B. Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(2):308-17.
12. Nance KV. Evolution of Pap testing at a community hospital-a ten year experience. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35(3):148-153.
13. Ronco G, Cuzick J, Pierotti P, et al. Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007;335(7609):28. doi:10.1136/ bmj.39196.740995.BE.
14. Siebers AG, Klinkhamer PJ, Grefte JM, et al. Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology for detection of cervical cancer precursors: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;302(16):1757-1764.
15. Kitchener HC, Almonte M, Gilham C, et al; ARTISTIC Trial Study Group. ARTISTIC: a randomised trial of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in primary cervical screening. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(51):1-150.
16. Hutchinson ML, Isenstein LM, Goodman AK, et al. Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep processor. Am J Clin Pathol. 1994;101(2):215-219.
17. Liu X, Dai Q, Jiang Y. Proficiency testing experience with College of American Pathologists' programs at a University Hospital in China From 2007 to 2011. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(1):114-120.