Three-dimensional topology of the SMC2/SMC4 subcomplex from chicken condensin I revealed by cross-linking and molecular modelling

Open Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Barysz, Helena ^a,f   Kim, Ji Hun ^a,b,c,g   Chen, Zhuo Angel ^a   Hudson, Damien F ^b,c   Rappsilber, Juri ^a,d   Gerloff, Dietlind L ^e   Earnshaw, William C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^e FOUNDATION FOR APPLIED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION   (United States)

^f LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^g JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coiled coil; Condensin; Cross linking; Mass spectrometry; SMC; Structure

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; CONDENSIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HISTONE; HYBRID PROTEIN; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; NUCLEAR PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CHICKEN; CHROMOSOME; GENETIC LINKAGE; METABOLISM; MITOSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CHICKENS; CHROMOSOMES; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENETIC LINKAGE; HISTONES; MITOSIS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS;

EID: 84923677327     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20462441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.150005     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Nolivos S, Sherratt D. 2014 The bacterial chromosome: architecture and action of bacterial SMC and SMC-like complexes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38, 380-392. (doi:10.1111/1574-6976. 12045)
2. Jessberger R. 2002 The many functions of SMC proteins in chromosome dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 767-778. (doi:10.1038/nrm930)
3. Hudson DF, Marshall KM, Earnshaw WC. 2009 Condensin: architect of mitotic chromosomes. Chromosome Res. 17, 131-144. (doi:10.1007/ s10577-008-9009-7)
4. Wood AJ, Severson AF, Meyer BJ. 2010 Condensin and cohesin complexity: the expanding repertoire of functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 391-404. (doi:10. 1038/nrg2794)
5. Cuylen S, Haering CH. 2011 Deciphering condensin action during chromosome segregation. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 552-559. (doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011. 06.003)
6. Aragon L, Martinez-Perez E, Merkenschlager M. 2013 Condensin, cohesin and the control of chromatin states. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23, 204-211. (doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.11.004)
7. Jeppsson K, Kanno T, Shirahige K, Sjogren C. 2014 The maintenance of chromosome structure: positioning and functioning of SMC complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 601-614. (doi:10.1038/nrm3857)
8. Saitoh N, Goldberg IG, Earnshaw WC. 1995 The SMC proteins and the coming of age of the chromosome scaffold hypothesis. Bioessays 17, 759-766. (doi:10.1002/bies.950170905)
9. Haering CH, Lowe J, Hochwagen A, Nasmyth K. 2002 Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell 9, 773-788. (doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(02)0 0515-4)
10. Hirano T. 2006 At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 311-322. (doi:10.1038/nrm1909)
11. Hirano T. 2012 Condensins: universal organizers of chromosomes with diverse functions. Genes Dev. 26, 1659-1678. (doi:10.1101/gad.194746.112)
12. Chiu A, Revenkova E, Jessberger R. 2004 DNA interaction and dimerization of eukaryotic SMC hinge domains. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 26 233-26 242. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M402439200)
13. Hirano M, Hirano T. 2004 Positive and negative regulation of SMC-DNA interactions by ATP and accessory proteins. EMBO J. 23, 2664-2673. (doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600264)
14. Griese JJ, Witte G, Hopfner KP. 2010 Structure and DNA binding activity of the mouse condensin hinge domain highlight common and diverse features of SMC proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 3454-3465. (doi:10.1093/nar/gkq038)
15. Hirano M, Anderson DE, Erickson HP, Hirano T. 2001 Bimodal activation of SMC ATPase by intra- and inter-molecular interactions. EMBO J. 20, 3238-3250. (doi:10.1093/emboj/20.12.3238)
16. Kurze A et al. 2010 A positively charged channel within the Smc1/Smc3 hinge required for sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO J. 30, 364-378. (doi:10. 1038/emboj.2010.315)
17. Anderson DE, Losada A, Erickson HP, Hirano T. 2002 Condensin and cohesin display different arm conformations with characteristic hinge angles. J. Cell Biol. 156, 419-424. (doi:10.1083/jcb. 200111002)
18. Nasmyth K, Haering CH. 2005 The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 595-648. (doi:10.1146/annurev. biochem.74.082803.133219)
19. Melby TE, Ciampaglio CN, Briscoe G, Erickson HP.1998 The symmetrical structure of structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) and MukB proteins: long, antiparallel coiled coils, folded at a flexible hinge. J. Cell Biol. 142, 1595-1604. (doi:10.1083/jcb.142.6.1595)
20. Yoshimura SH, Hizume K, Murakami A, Sutani T, Takeyasu K, Yanagida M. 2002 Condensin architecture and interaction with DNA: regulatory non-SMC subunits bind to the head of SMC heterodimer. Curr. Biol. 12, 508-513. (doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822(02)00719-4)
21. Gruber S, Haering CH, Nasmyth K. 2003 Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell 112, 765-777. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00162-4)
22. Nasmyth K, Haering CH. 2009 Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 525-558. (doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233)
23. Cuylen S, Metz J, Haering CH. 2011 Condensin structures chromosomal DNA through topological links. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 894-901. (doi:10. 1038/nsmb.2087)
24. Hirano T, Kobayashi R, Hirano M. 1997 Condensins, chromosome condensation protein complexes containing XCAP-C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila barren protein. Cell 89, 511-521. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80233-0)
25. Ono T, Losada A, Hirano M, Myers MP, Neuwald AF, Hirano T. 2003 Differential contributions of condensin I and condensin II to mitotic chromosome architecture in vertebrate cells. Cell 115, 109-121. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03) 00724-4)
26. Ono T, Fang Y, Spector DL, Hirano T. 2004 Spatial and temporal regulation of condensins I and II in mitotic chromosome assembly in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 3296-3308. (doi:10.1091/mbc.E04-03-0242)
27. Shintomi K, Hirano T. 2011 The relative ratio of condensin I to II determines chromosome shapes. Genes Dev. 25, 1464-1469. (doi:10.1101/gad. 2060311)
28. Green LC et al. 2012 Contrasting roles of condensin I and condensin II in mitotic chromosome formation. J. Cell Sci. 125, 1591-1604. (doi:10.1242/jcs. 097790)
29. Schleiffer A, Kaitna S, Maurer-Stroh S, Glotzer M, Nasmyth K, Eisenhaber F. 2003 Kleisins: a superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC protein partners. Mol. Cell 11, 571-575. (doi:10.1016/ S1097-2765(03)00108-4)
30. Onn I, Aono N, Hirano M, Hirano T. 2007 Reconstitution and subunit geometry of human condensin complexes. EMBO J. 26, 1024-1034. (doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601562)
31. Gligoris TG et al. 2014 Closing the cohesin ring: structure and function of its Smc3-kleisin interface. Science 346, 963-967. (doi:10.1126/science. 1256917)
32. Neuwald AF, Hirano T. 2000 HEAT repeats associated with condensins, cohesins, and other complexes involved in chromosome-related functions. Genome Res. 10, 1445-1452. (doi:10.1101/gr.147400)
33. Piazza I, Rutkowska A, Ori A, Walczak M, Metz J, Pelechano V, Beck M, Haering CH. 2014 Association of condensin with chromosomes depends on DNA binding by its HEAT-repeat subunits. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 560-568. (doi:10.1038/ nsmb.2831)
34. Takemoto A, Kimura K, Yokoyama S, Hanaoka F. 2004 Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation, nuclear localization, and activation of human condensin. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 4551-4559. (doi:10.1074/jbc. M310925200)
35. Kimura K, Hirano M, Kobayashi R, Hirano T. 1998 Phosphorylation and activation of 13S condensin by Cdc2 in vitro. Science 282, 487-490. (doi:10.1126/ science.282.5388.487)
36. Weitzel CS, Waldman VM, Graham TA, Oakley MG. 2011 A repeated coiled-coil interruption in the Escherichia coli condensin MukB. J. Mol. Biol. 414, 578-595. (doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.10.028)
37. Parry DA. 1982 Coiled-coils in alpha-helixcontaining proteins: analysis of the residue types within the heptad repeat and the use of these data in the prediction of coiled-coils in other proteins. Biosci. Rep. 2, 1017-1024. (doi:10.1007/ BF01122170)
38. Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J. 1991 Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252, 1162-1164. (doi:10.1126/science.252.5009. 1162)
39. van Noort J, van Der Heijden T, de Jager M, Wyman C, Kanaar R, Dekker C. 2003 The coiled-coil of the human Rad50 DNA repair protein contains specific segments of increased flexibility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7581-7586. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 1330706100)
40. Lupas AN, Gruber M. 2005 The structure of alphahelical coiled coils. Adv. Protein Chem. 70, 37-78. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3233(05)70003-6)
41. Cobbe N, Heck MM. 2000 Review: SMCs in the world of chromosome biology: from prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes. J. Struct. Biol. 129, 123-143. (doi:10.1006/jsbi.2000.4255)
42. Beasley M, Xu H, Warren W, McKay M. 2002 Conserved disruptions in the predicted coiled-coil domains of eukaryotic SMC complexes: implications for structure and function. Genome Res. 12, 1201-1209. (doi:10.1101/gr107302)
43. Testa OD, Moutevelis E, Woolfson DN. 2009 CC+ : a relational database of coiled-coil structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D315-D322. (doi:10.1093/nar/ gkn675)
44. Rappsilber J. 2010 The beginning of a beautiful friendship: cross-linking/mass spectrometry and modelling of proteins and multi-protein complexes. J. Struct. Biol. 173, 530-540. (doi:10.1016/j.jsb. 2010.10.014)
45. Walzthoeni T, Leitner A, Stengel F, Aebersold R. 2013 Mass spectrometry supported determination of protein complex structure. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23, 252-260. (doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2013. 02.008)
46. Maiolica A, Cittaro D, Borsotti D, Sennels L, Ciferri C, Tarricone C, Musacchio A, Rappsilber J. 2007 Structural analysis of multiprotein complexes by cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and database searching. Mol. Cell Proteomics 6, 2200-2211. (doi:10.1074/mcp.M700274-MCP200)
47. Ciferri C et al. 2008 Implications for kinetochoremicrotubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133, 427-339. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.020)
48. Bui KH et al. 2013 Integrated structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex scaffold. Cell 155, 1233-1243. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.055)
49. Herzog F et al. 2012 Structural probing of a protein phosphatase 2A network by chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Science 337, 1348-1352. (doi:10.1126/science.1221483)
50. Chen ZA et al. 2010 Architecture of the RNA polymerase II-TFIIF complex revealed by crosslinking and mass spectrometry. EMBO J. 29, 717-726. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.401)
51. Murakami K et al. 2013 Architecture of an RNA polymerase II transcription pre-initiation complex. Science 342, 1238724. (doi:10.1126/science. 1238724)
52. Huis in 't Veld PJ, Herzog F, Ladurner R, Davidson IF, Piric S, Kreidl E, Bhaskara V, Aebersold R, Peters JM. 2014 Characterization of a DNA exit gate in the human cohesin ring. Science 346, 968-972. (doi:10.1126/science.1256904)
53. Abad MA et al. 2014 Structural basis for microtubule recognition by the human kinetochore Ska complex. Nat. Commun. 5, 2964. (doi:10.1038/ ncomms3964)
54. Hudson DF et al. 2008 Molecular and genetic analysis of condensin function in vertebrate cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 3070-3079. (doi:10.1091/mbc.E08-01-0057)
55. Sutani T, Yanagida M. 1997 DNA renaturation activity of the SMC complex implicated in chromosome condensation. Nature 388, 798-801. (doi:10.1038/42062)
56. Combe CW, Fischer L, Rappsilber J. In press. xiNET: cross-link network maps with residue resolution. Mol. Cell Proteomics (doi:10.1074/mcp. O114.042259)
57. Zhang J et al. 2008 Acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1 is required for S phase sister chromatid cohesion in both human and yeast. Mol. Cell 31, 143-151. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.06.006)
58. Ohta S et al. 2010 The protein composition of mitotic chromosomes determined using multiclassifier combinatorial proteomics. Cell 142, 810-821. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.047)
59. Adolph KW, Cheng SM, Paulson JR, Laemmli UK. 1977 Isolation of a protein scaffold from mitotic HeLa cell chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 11, 4937-4941. (doi:10.1073/pnas.74.11.4937)
60. König P, Braunfeld MB, Sedat JW, Agard DA. 2007 The three-dimensional structure of in vitro reconstituted Xenopus laevis chromosomes by EM tomography. Chromosoma 116, 349-372. (doi:10. 1007/s00412-007-0101-0)
61. Foltz DR, Jansen LE, Black BE, Bailey AO, Yates JR, Cleveland DW. 2006 The human CENP-A centromeric nucleosome-associated complex. Nat. Cell. Biol. 8, 458-469. (doi:10.1038/ncb1397)
62. Basilico F et al. 2014 The pseudo GTPase CENP-M drives human kinetochore assembly. Elife 3, e02978. (doi:10.7554/eLife.02978)
63. Lee JH, Paull TT. 2007 Activation and regulation of ATM kinase activity in response to DNA doublestrand breaks. Oncogene 26, 7741-7748. (doi:10. 1038/sj.onc.1210872)
64. Shiloh Y, Ziv Y. 2013 The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 197-210. (doi:10.1038/nrm3546)
65. Tada K, Susumu H, Sakuno T, Watanabe Y. 2011 Condensin association with histone H2A shapes mitotic chromosomes. Nature 474, 477-483. (doi:10.1038/nature10179)
66. Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. 1997 Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 389, 251-260. (doi:10.1038/38444)
67. Liu W et al. 2010 PHF8 mediates histone H4 lysine 20 demethylation events involved in cell cycle progression. Nature 466, 508-512. (doi:10.1038/ nature09272)
68. Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T, Sato T, Nagasu T, Rappsilber J, Mann M. 2005 Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4, 1265-1272. (doi:10.1074/mcp. M500061-MCP200)
69. Kahraman A, Malmstrom L, Aebersold R. 2011 Xwalk: computing and visualizing distances in cross-linking experiments. Bioinformatics 27, 2163-2164. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr348)
70. Burmann F, Shin HC, Basquin J, Soh YM, Gimenez-Oya V, Kim YG, Oh BH, Gruber S. 2013 An asymmetric SMC-kleisin bridge in prokaryotic condensin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 371-379. (doi:10.1038/nsmb.2488)
71. Cobbe N, Heck MM. 2004 The evolution of SMC proteins: phylogenetic analysis and structural implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 332-347. (doi:10. 1093/molbev/msh023)
72. Lowe J, Cordell SC, van den Ent F. 2001 Crystal structure of the SMC head domain: an ABC ATPase with 900 residues antiparallel coiled-coil inserted. J. Mol. Biol. 306, 25-35. (doi:10.1006/jmbi. 2000.4379)
73. Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA. 2001 Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10 037-10 041. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 181342398)
74. Akai Y, Kanai R, Nakazawa N, Ebe M, Toyoshima C, Yanagida M. 2014 ATPase-dependent autophosphorylation of the open condensin hinge diminishes DNA binding. Open Biol. 4, 140193. (doi:10.1098/rsob.140193)
75. Li X, He L, Che KH, Funderburk SF, Pan L, Pan N, Zhang M, Yue Z, Zhao Y. 2012 Imperfect interface of Beclin1 coiled-coil domain regulates homodimer and heterodimer formation with Atg14L and UVRAG. Nat. Commun. 3, 662. (doi:10.1038/ ncomms1648)
76. Banner DW, Kokkinidis M, Tsernoglou D. 1987 Structure of the ColE1 rop protein at 1.7 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 196, 657-675. (doi:10. 1016/0022-2836(87)90039-8)
77. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. 2004 UCSF CHIMERA: a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612. (doi:10.1002/jcc.20084)
78. Haering CH, Schoffnegger D, Nishino T, Helmhart W, Nasmyth K, Lowe J. 2004 Structure and stability of cohesin's Smc1-kleisin interaction. Mol. Cell 15, 951-964. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.08.030)
79. Seo J, Cohen C. 1993 Pitch diversity in alpha-helical coiled coils. Proteins 15, 223-234. (doi:10.1002/ prot.340150302)
80. Tao Y, Strelkov SV, Mesyanzhinov VV, Rossmann MG. 1997 Structure of bacteriophage T4 fibritin: a segmented coiled coil and the role of the C-terminal domain. Structure 5, 789-798. (doi:10. 1016/S0969-2126(97)00233-5)
81. Li Y, Weitzel CS, Arnold RJ, Oakley MG. 2009 Identification of interacting regions within the coiled coil of the Escherichia coli structural maintenance of chromosomes protein MukB. J. Mol. Biol. 391, 57-73. (doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009. 05.070)
82. Parry DA, Fraser RD, Squire JM. 2008 Fifty years of coiled-coils and alpha-helical bundles: a close relationship between sequence and structure. J. Struct. Biol. 163, 258-269. (doi:10.1016/j.jsb. 2008.01.016)
83. Maure JF, Komoto S, Oku Y, Mino A, Pasqualato S, Natsume K, Clayton L, Musacchio A, Tanaka TU. 2011 The Ndc80 loop region facilitates formation of kinetochore attachment to the dynamic microtubule plus end. Curr. Biol. 21, 207-213. (doi:10.1016/j. cub.2010.12.050)
84. Tang NH, Toda T. 2013 Ndc80 loop as a protein-protein interaction motif. Cell Div. 8, 2. (doi:10. 1186/1747-1028-8-2)
85. Earnshaw WC, Laemmli UK. 1983 Architecture of metaphase chromosomes and chromosome scaffolds. J. Cell Biol. 96, 84-93. (doi:10.1083/jcb.96.1.84)
86. Sonoda E et al. 2001 Scc1/Rad21/Mcd1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion and kinetochore function in vertebrate cells. Dev. Cell 1, 759-770. (doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00088-0)
87. Grawunder U, Schatz DG, Leu TM, Rolink A, Melchers F. 1996 The half-life of RAG-1 protein in precursor B cells is increased in the absence of RAG-2 expression. J. Exp. Med. 183, 1731-1737. (doi:10. 1084/jem.183.4.1731)
88. Rappsilber J, Ishihama Y, Mann M. 2003 Stop and go extraction tips for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. Anal. Chem. 75, 663-670. (doi:10.1021/ac026117i)
89. Cox J, Mann M. 2008 MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367-1372. (doi:10.1038/nbt.1511)
90. Biegert A, Mayer C, Remmert M, Soding J, Lupas AN. 2006 The MPI bioinformatics toolkit for protein 18 rsob.royalsocietypublishing.org Open Biol. 5: 150005 sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W335-W339. (doi:10.1093/nar/gkl217)
91. Fiser A, Sali A. 2003 Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. Methods Enzymol. 374, 461-491. (doi:10. 1016/S0076-6879(03)74020-8)
92. Kurowski MA, Bujnicki JM. 2003 GeneSilico protein structure prediction meta-server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3305-3307. (doi:10.1093/nar/ gkg557)
93. Benner SA, Cannarozzi G, Gerloff D, Turcotte M, Chelvanayagam G. 1997 Bona fide predictions of protein secondary structure using transparent analyses of multiple sequence alignments. Chem. Rev. 97, 2725-2844. (doi:10.1021/ cr940469a)
94. st century. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 431-440. (doi:10.1016/S0959-440X(02) 00344-5)
95. Soh YM et al. 2015 Molecular basis for SMC rod formation and its dissolution upon DNA binding. Mol. Cell 57, 290-303. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014. 11.023)