Solid, part-solid, or non-solid? Classification of pulmonary nodules in low-dose chest computed tomography by a computer-aided diagnosis system

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 168-173

  Jacobs, Colin ^a   Van Rikxoort, Eva M ^a,b   Scholten, Ernst T ^a,c,d   De Jong, Pim A ^d   Prokop, Mathias ^a   Schaefer Prokop, Cornelia ^a,e   Van Ginneken, Bram ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b FRAUNHOFER MEVIS   (Germany)

^c Department of Orthopaedic Surgery   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^e MEANDER MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

classification; computed tomography; computer aided diagnosis; pulmonary nodule

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGIST; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON SOLID LUNG NODULE; PART SOLID LUNG NODULE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; SOLID LUNG NODULE; STAFF TRAINING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THORAX; VALIDATION PROCESS; AGED; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BELGIUM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; PROCEDURES; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; BELGIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE VALIDATION; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84923650021     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000121     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2012. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/cancerfactsfigures2012. Accessed January 16, 2014
2. Aberle DR, AdamsAM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with lowdose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 395-409
3. MacMahon H, Austin JHM, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement fromthe Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2005; 237: 395-400
4. Godoy MCB, Naidich DP. Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology. 2009; 253: 606-622
5. Naidich DP, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, et al. Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2013; 266: 304-317
6. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178: 1053-1057
7. McWilliams A, TammemagiMC, Mayo JR, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl JMed. 2013; 369: 910-919
8. Yildirim A, Ridge CA, Boiselle PM, et al. Differentiating subsolid and solid pulmonary nodules on CT: inter- and intraobserver agreement among experienced thoracic radiologists. In: European Congress of Radiology; March 8, 2013, Vienna, Austria
9. van Riel S, van Rikxoort EM, Jacobs C, et al. Intra- and inter-reader variability of pulmonary nodule classification according to the Fleischner guidelines: clinical consequences. In: Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America. 2013
10. van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M, et al. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl JMed. 2009; 361: 2221-2229
11. Kuhnigk JM, DickenV, Bornemann L, et al.Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006; 25: 417-434
12. Scholten ET, Jacobs C, van Ginneken B, et al.computer-Aided segmentation and volumetry of artificial ground-glass nodules at chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 201: 295-300
13. Ojala T, PietikainenM, Maenpaa T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2002; 24: 971-987
14. Cover T, Hart P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1967; 13: 21-27
15. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20: 37-46
16. TravisWD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. IASLC/ATS/ERS International multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011; 6: 244-285
17. Takashima S, Maruyama Y, Hasegawa M, et al. Prognostic significance of highresolution CT findings in small peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung: a retrospective study on 64 patients. Lung Cancer. 2002; 36: 289-295
18. Miao XH, Yao YW, Yuan DM, et al. Prognostic value of the ratio of ground glass opacity on computed tomography in small lung adenocarcinoma: a meta-Analysis. J ThoracDis. 2012; 4: 265-271
19. Raad RA, Suh J, Harari S, et al. Nodule characterization: subsolid nodules. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014; 52: 47-67
20. Jeon KN, Goo JM, Lee CH, et al.computer-Aided nodule detection and volumetry to reduce variability between radiologists in the interpretation of lung nodules at low-dose screening computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47: 457-461
21. Lee KH, Goo JM, Park SJ, et al. Correlation between the size of the solid component on thin-section CT and the invasive component on pathology in small lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as ground-glass nodules. J Thorac Oncol. 2014; 9: 74-82
22. Maldonado F, Boland JM, Raghunath S, et al. Noninvasive characterization of the histopathologic features of pulmonary nodules of the lung adenocarcinoma spectrum using computer-Aided nodule assessment and risk yield (CANARY)-A pilot study. J Thorac Oncol. 2013; 8: 452-460
23. Kawata Y, Niki N, Ohmatsu H, et al. Quantitative classification based on CT histogram analysis of non-small cell lung cancer: correlation with histopathological characteristics and recurrence-free survival. Med Phys. 2012; 39: 988-1000