How latin-american primary school principals distribute their time and the effect on student performance;La distribución del tiempo de los directores de escuelas de educación primaria en América latina y su incidencia en el desempeño de los estudiantes

Revista de Educacion

Volumn , Issue 361, 2013, Pages 141-170

  Javier Murillo Torrecilla, F ^a   Carrasco, Marcela Román ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD ALBERTO HURTADO   (Chile)

Author keywords

Latin America; Primary education; School administration; School management; Time distribution

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923649597     PISSN: 00348082     EISSN: 1988592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-361-138     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Antúnez, S. (1991). Anàlisi de les tasques dels directors i directores escolares de centres públics d’Ensenyament Primari de Catalunya. (Investigación inédita). Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
2. Antúnez, S. (1995). El uso del tiempo personal de los directivos escolares. En J. Gairín y P. Darder (Eds.), Estrategias e instrumentos para la gestión educativa, 413-422. Barcelona: Praxis.
3. Armas, M. (1997). Dirección de centros en reforma. De la supervivencia a la excelencia. Organización y Gestión Educativa, 2, 9-14.
4. Billot, J. (2003). The Real and the Ideal: The Roles and Workload of Secondary Principals in New Zealand. International Studies in Educational Administration, 3 (1), 33-40.
5. Burke, J. R. (1980). A Study of Similarities and Differences in Elementary Principals’ Perceived Allocation and Ideal Allocation of Time. (Tesis doctoral). Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America.
6. Buttram, J. L., Mead, H., Loftus, D. y Wilson, J. O. (2008). Allocation of School Leaders Time. Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New York, April.
7. Chan, T. y Pool, H. (2002). Principals’ Priorities versus their Realities: Reducing the Gap. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April.
8. Coronel, J. M. (2008). El liderazgo pedagógico: un reto y una posibilidad para la mejora educativa. En A. Villa (Coord.), Innovación y cambio en las organizaciones educativas, 337-360. Bilbao: ICE de la Universidad de Deusto.
9. Cotton, K. (2003). Principals and Student Achievement: What the Research says. Alexandria (Vancouver): Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10. Fitzgerald, I. (1996). Time Management for School Administrators. Rockport (Massachusetts): Pro Active Publications.
11. Ghosey, L. W. (1987). Actual, Estimated, and Ideal Time Used by Principals of Sixty-Four Largest High School in Kansas. (Tesis doctoral). University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
12. Gimeno, J. (1995). La dirección de centros: análisis de tareas. Madrid: CIDE.
13. Goldring, E., Huff, J., May, H. y Camburn, E. (2008). School Context and Individual Characteristics: what Influences Principal Practice? Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (3), 332-352.
14. Gordon, R. L. (1996). Relationships among Secondary Principal Use of Time, Principal Effectiveness, and Student Achievement. (Tesis doctoral). University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
15. Gorman, M. R. (1993). Time Management Strategies and the Implications for Instructional Leadership of High School Principals: A Case Study Analysis. (Tesis doctoral). Widener University, Chester, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
16. Guzzetti, B., Martin, M. (1984). A Comparative Analysis of Elementary and Secondary Principals Instructional Leadership Behaviour. University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America. Recuperado de http://www.eric.ed.gov/ ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/34/88/4b.pdf.
17. Hallet, J. (1985). The Relationship between Gender and School Principal’s Allocation of Time. (Tesis doctoral). University of Washington, Washington D. C., United States of America.
18. Hallinger, P. y Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9 (2), 157-191.
19. Heck, R. H. y Hallinger, P. (1999). Next Generation Methods for the Study of Leadership and School Improvement. En J. Murphy y K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Administration, (141-162). New York: Longman.
20. Helps, R. (1994). The Allocation of Non-Contact Time to Deputy Headteachers in Primary Schools. School Organisation, 14 (3), 243-246.
21. Huff, J. (2006). Measuring a Leader’s Practice: Past Efforts and Present Opportunities to Capture What Educational Leaders Do. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April.
22. Kmetz, J. T. y Willower, D. (1982). Elementary School Principals’ Work Behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18 (4), 62-78.
23. Kellog, S., Edlefson, C., Fraas, J. y Engler, C. (2005). Elementary Principals’ Organizational Activities. Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, October.
24. Larry, C. D. (2003). A Study of Time Management Use and Preferred Time Management Practices of Middle and Secondary School Principals in Selected Southern States. (Tesis doctoral). University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States of America.
25. Leithwood, K. A. y Riehl, C. (2005). What we Know about Successful School Leadership. En W. Firestone y C. Riehl (Eds.), A New Agenda for Research on Educational Leadership, (12-27). New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S. y Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How Leadership Influences Student Learning. New York: Wallace Foundation.
27. Levacic, R. (2005). Educational Leadership as a Causal Factor. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33 (2), 197-210.
28. LLECE (2008). Los aprendizajes de los estudiantes de América Latina y el Caribe. Primer reporte SERCE. Santiago de Chile: OREALC, Unesco.
29. MacNeil, N., Cavanagh, R. F. y Silox, S. (2003). Pedagogic Principal Leadership. Management in Education, 17 (4), 14-17.
30. Maiden, W. B., Harrold, R. I. (1988). Tools for Principals to Appraise their Own Work Activities. School Organization, 8 (2), 211-228.
31. Murillo, F. J. (2007). Investigación iberoamericana sobre eficacia escolar. Bogotá: Convenio Andrés Bello.
32. Murillo, F. J., Barrio, R. (1999). Análisis de la distribución del tiempo de los directivos de centros de enseñanza primaria. Revista de Educación, 319, 201-222.
33. Murillo, F. J., Barrio, R. y Pérez-Albo, M. J. (1999). La dirección escolar. Análisis e investigación. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Cultura, CIDE.
34. Nelson, D. K. (1983). A Profile of the Elementary School Principalship in Texas in 1982. (Tesis doctoral). Texas University, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
35. Nettles, S. M. y Herrington, C. (2007). Revisiting the Importance of the Direct Effects of School Leadership on Student Achievement: The Implications for School Improvement Policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 82 (4), 724-736.
36. Osborne, W. y Wiggins, T. (1989). Perceptions on Tasks in the School Principalship. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2 (3), 367-376.
37. Pont, B., Nusche, D. y Moorman, H. (2008). Mejorar el liderazgo escolar. París: OCDE.
38. Rayfield, R. y Diamantes, T. (2004). Task Analysis of the Duties Performed in Secondary School Administration. Education, 124 (4), 709-713.
39. Selman, J. W. (1991). An Analysis of Time-on-Task Perceptions of Public and Private College Administrators. (Informe inédito). University of Auburn, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
40. Taylor, K. C. (2007). A Study of Principal’s Perceptions regarding Time Management. (Tesis doctoral). Kansas State University, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
41. Vaill, P. (1986). The Purposing of High-Performing Systems. En T. Sergiovanni y J. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and Organizational Culture, (85-105). Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
42. Vázquez Recio, R. (2009). El mosaico del tiempo de la acción directiva. Conceptualización y problemática. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 51, 183-199.
43. Viñao, A. (2005). La dirección escolar: un análisis genealógico-cultural. En M. Fernández Enguita y M. Gutiérrez (Coords.), Organización escolar, profesión docente y entorno comunitario, (35-81). Madrid: Akal.
44. Walker, J. (2009). Reorganizing Leaders’ Time: Does it Create Better Schools for Students? Annual Conference of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, San Antonio, Texas, August.
45. Waters, T., Marzano, R. J. y McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced Leadership: What 30 Years of Research Tells us about the Effect of Leadership on Student Achievement. Aurora (Colorado): Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
46. Wells, G. A. (1993). Instructional Management Behavior, Time Management, and Selected Background Variables of Elementary School Principals in Connecticut’s Urban School Districts. (Tesis doctoral). University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.
47. Whitaker, T. y Turner, E. (2000). What is your Priority? NASSP Bulletin, 84 (617), 16-21.
48. Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J. y Kruger, M. L. (2003). Educational Leadership and Student Achievement: The Elusive Search for an Association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39 (3), 398-425.