The effect of distance correction factor in casebased predictions of vegetation classes in Karula, Estonia

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 38, Issue , 2010, Pages 570-574

  Linder, M ^a   Jakobson, L ^a   Absalon, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Case based Predictions; Distance related Similarity Correction; Machine Learning; Predictive Vegetation Mapping; Remote Sensing and Map Data; Spatial Autocorrelation

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOCORRELATION; DATA HANDLING; FORECASTING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; REMOTE SENSING; VEGETATION;

CASE BASED; DISTANCE CORRECTIONS; MAP DATA; PREDICTION SYSTEMS; REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE; SAMPLE ESTIMATIONS; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATIONS; VEGETATION MAPPING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84923642541     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Aha, D. W., 1998. The omnipresence of case-based reasoning in science and application. Knowledge-Based Systems, 11, pp. 261-273.
2. Augustin N.H.,Kublin E.,Metzler B.,Meierjohann E.,von Wuhlisch G. 2005 Analyzing the spread of beech canker Forest Science 51 438-448.
3. Augustin N.H., Mugglestone M.A., Buckland S.T., 1996. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, pp. 339-347.
4. Betts, M. G., Diamond, A.W., Forbes, G.J., Villard, M.-A., Gunn, J.S., 2006. The importance of spatial autocorrelation, extent and resolution in predicting forest bird occurrence. Ecological Modelling, 191, pp. 197-224.
5. Carl, G., Kühn, I., 2007. Analyzing spatial autocorrelation in species distributions using Gaussian and logit models. Ecological Modelling, 207, pp. 159-170.
6. CONSTUD, 2009. http://www.geo.ut.ee/CONSTUD (accessed 13 Dec. 2009).
7. Davies, C. E., Moss, D., Hill, M. O., 2004. EUNIS Habitat Classification. Revised 2004. http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/upload/EUNIS-2004-report.pdf (accessed 15 Oct. 2009).
8. Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Bini L.M., Hawkins B.A., 2003. Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 12, pp. 53-64.
9. Dormann, C. F., McPherson, J. M., Araujo, M. B., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., Davies, R. G., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Kissling, W. D., Kühn, I., Ohlemüller, R., Peres-Neto, P. R., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Schurr, F. M., Wilson, R., 2007. Methods to account for spatial autoc orrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30(5), pp. 609-628.
10. Knapp, R.A., Matthews, K.R., Preisler, H.K., Jellison, R., 2003. Developing probabilistic models t o predict amphibian site occupancy in a patchy landscape. Ecological Applications, 13, pp. 1069-1082.
11. Linder, M., Remm, K., Absalon, E., 2009. The utility of the machine learning and prediction system CONSTUD. In: Mander, U., Uuemaa, E., Pae, T. (Eds.). Uurimusi eestikeelse geograafia 90. aastap äeval. Publicationes Instituti Geographici Universitatis Tartuensis, 108, pp. 52-62. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
12. Linder, M., Remm, K., Proosa, H., 2008. The application of the concept of indicative neighbourhood on Landsat ETM+ images and orthophotos, using circular and annulus kernels. In: Ruas, A., Gold, C. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 13th Internation al Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Montpellier, France, 23rd-25th June, pp. 147-162. Springer.
13. LSTATS, 2009. http://www.geo.ut.ee/LSTATS (accessed 13 Dec. 2009).
14. Luoto M., Poyry J., Heikkinen R.K., Saarinen K., 2005. Uncertainty of bioclimate envelope models based on the geographical distribution of species. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 14, pp. 575-584.
15. Muchoney, D. M., Strahler, A. H., 2002. Pixel-And site-based calibration and validation methods for evaluating supervised classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 81, pp. 290-299.
16. Osborne P.E., Alonso J.C., Bryant R.G., 2001. Modelling landscape-scale habitat use using GIS and remote sensing: a case study with great bustards. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, pp. 458-471.
17. Remm , K., 2004. Case-based predictions for species and habitat mapping. Ecological Modelling, 177(3-4), pp. 259-281.
18. Remm, K., Linder, M., Remm, L., 2009. Relative density of finds for assessing similarity-based maps of orchid occurrence. Ecological Modelling, 220(3), pp. 294-309.
19. Remm, K., Remm, L., 2009. Similarity-based large-scale distribution mapping of orchids. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18(6), pp. 1629-1647.
20. Remm, M., Remm, K., 2008. Case-based estimation of the risk of enterobiasis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 43(3), pp. 167-177.
21. Sokal , R. R., Oden, N., 1978. Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 1. Methodology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10, pp. 199-228.
22. Tamm, T., Remm, K., 2009. Estimating the parameters of fores t inventory using machine learning and the reduction of remote sensing features. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 11(4), pp. 290-297.