RMNO and quality control of scientific advice to policy

The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 139-156

  de Wit, Bert ^a  

^a PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923628770     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511777141.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Abma, T. 2001. 'Variatie in beleidsevaluaties/Variations in policy evaluation,' in T. Abma and R. In't Veld (eds.), Handboek beleidswetenschap (Handbook of Policy Sciences), Meppel: Uitgeverij Boom.
2. Bergmann, Matthias, Brohmann, Bettina, Hofmann, Esther, Loibl, M. Céline, Rehaag, Regine, Schramm, Engelbert and Voß, Jan-Peter 2005. Qualitätskriterien transdisziplinärer Forschung. Ein Leitfaden für die formative Evaluation von Forschungsprojekten.-Quality Criteria for Transdisciplinary Research. A Guide for the Formative Evaluation of Research Project, ISOE-Studientexte Nr. 13, Frankfurt am Main.
3. Hajer, M. A. and Wagenaar, H. (eds.) 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Cambridge University Press.
4. Halffman, W. and Hoppe, R. 2005. 'Science policy boundaries: A changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice,' in Sabine Maasen and Peter Weingart (eds.), Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 135-52.
5. Halffman, W. 2008. States of Nature: Nature and fish stock reports for policy, Report for the Netherlands Consultative Committee of Sector Councils for research and development, RMNO preliminary study V. 13, The Hague.
6. Hisschemöller, M. 1998. Kennisbenutting en politieke keuze: Een dilemma voor het milieubeleid? (Knowledge Utilisation and Political Choice: A Dilemma for Environmental Policy?), Werkdocument no. 65, DenHaag, Rathenau-Instituut.
7. Hoppe, R. and Huijs, S. 2003. Werk op de grenzen van wetenschap en beleid. Paradoxen en dilemma's (Work on the Boundaries of Science and Policy), Paradoxes and Dilemmas. RMNO nr. 157, Den Haag.
8. In't Veld, R. J. 2000. Willingly and Knowingly. The Role of Knowledge About Nature and The Environment in Policy Processes RMNO, Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.
9. In't Veld, R. J. 2001. Eerherstel voor Cassandra/Rehabilitation for Cassandra (available in English) WRR, RMNO, Den Haag.
10. Jasanoff, S. 2004. 'The idiom of co-production,' in Sheila Jasanoff (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London: Routledge, pp. 1-12.
11. Leeuw, F. 2001. 'Evaluatieonderzoek, auditing en controle in Nederland anno 2000/Evaluation Research, auditing and control in the Netherlands in 2000,' in T. Abma and R. In't Veld (eds.), Handboek beleidswetenschap, Meppel: Uitgeverij Boom.
12. KNAW 2005. Verklaring van Wetenschappelijke Onafhankelijkheid/Declaration of Scientific Independence, Amsterdam: KNAW.
13. RMNO 2001. Disaster, Failure Or Success? Towards a Better Interaction Between Scientists, Policymakers and Societal Groups, RMNO nr. 152, Den Haag.
14. Spaapen, J., Dijstelbloem, H. and Wamelink, F. 2004. A Model for the Evaluation of Research in the Context of Application. Self-Evaluation of Two Pharmaceutical Faculties in a New National System of Evaluation, Den Haag: COS.
15. Tweede Kamer (Dutch Parliament) 2004/2005. Grote Projecten uitvergroot. Een infrastructuur voor besluitvorming/Mega Projects Magnified. An Infrastructure for Decision-Making, TK vergaderjaar 2004/2005, nr. 29283, nr 6.
16. Weingart, Peter and Lentsch, Justus 2006. Standards and Best Practices of Scientific Policy Advice. Round Table Discussion with Sir David King, Chief Scientific Adviser to the British Government, Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.