Low-technology assisted reproduction and the risk of preterm birth in a hospital-based cohort

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 81-88.e2

  Messerlian, Carmen ^a   Platt, Robert W ^b   Tan, Seang Lin ^c   Gagnon, Robert ^c   Basso, Olga ^a,c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^c ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assisted reproduction; Infertility; Intrauterine insemination; Ovulation induction; Preterm birth

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DRUG USE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVULATION INDUCTION; PARITY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIMIPARA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING; TIME TO PREGNANCY; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CANADA; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HOSPITALIZATION; INCIDENCE; INFERTILITY; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE BIRTH; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CAUSALITY; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INFERTILITY; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE BIRTH; QUEBEC; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84923625262     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ESHRE Capri Workshop GroupBaird DT, Bhattacharya S, Devroey P, Diedrich K, Evers JL, et al. Failures (with some successes) of assisted reproduction and gamete donation programs. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:354-65.
2. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1520-4.
3. Schieve LA, Devine O, Boyle CA, Petrini JR, Warner L. Estimation of the contribution of non-assisted reproductive technology ovulation stimulation fertility treatments to US singleton and multiple births. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:1396-407.
4. Buckett WM, Tan SL. Congenital abnormalities in children born after assisted reproductive techniques: how much is associated with the presence of infertility and how much with its treatment? Fertil Steril 2005;84:1318-9.
5. Chen X-K, Wen SW, Bottomley J, Smith GN, Leader A, Walker MC. In vitro fertilization is associated with an increased risk for preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 2009;28:1-12.
6. Chen Y-H, Lin H-C, Chen S-F, Lin H-C. Increased risk of preterm births among women with uterine leiomyoma: a nationwide population-based study. Hum Reprod 2009;24:3049-56.
7. De Geyter C, De Geyter M, Steimann S, Zhang H, Holzgreve W. Comparative birth weights of singletons born after assisted reproduction and natural conception in previously infertile women. Hum Reprod 2006;21:705-12.
8. Filicori M, Cognigni GE, Gamberini E, Troilo E, Parmegiani L, Bernardi S. Impact of medically assisted fertility on preterm birth. BJOG 2005;112(Suppl 1):113-7.
9. Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2004;328:261-4.
10. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:551-63.
11. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Murphy KE, Beyene J, Ohlsson A. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;146:138-48.
12. Mitchell AA. Infertility treatment - more risks and challenges. N Engl J Med 2002;346:769-70.
13. Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2012;18:485-503.
14. Pinborg AA, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft AA, Aittomaki KK, Söderström-Anttila VV, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:87-104.
15. Reubinoff BE, Samueloff A, Ben-Haim M, Friedler S, Schenker JG, Lewin A. Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study. Fertil Steril 1997;67:1077-83.
16. Sazonova A, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A. Factors affecting obstetric outcome of singletons born after IVF. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2878-86.
17. Sazonova A, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Wennerholm UB, Bergh C. Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved/thawed embryos. Hum Reprod 2012;27:1343-50.
18. Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Porter TF, Luthy DA. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1039-45.
19. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen PP, Priest KK, Scott HH, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1803-13.
20. Messerlian C, Maclagan L, Basso O. Infertility and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2013;28:125-37.
21. Ertzeid GG, Storeng RR. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum Reprod 2001;16:221-5.
22. Gaudoin M. Ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination in infertile couples is associated with low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:611-6.
23. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011;30:377-99.
24. Basso O, Baird D. Infertility and preterm delivery, birthweight, and caesarean section: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2478-84.
25. Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006;28:220-50.
26. Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Rebar RW, Tasca RJ. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:967-77.
27. Källén B, Olausson PO, Nygren KG. Neonatal outcome in pregnancies from ovarian stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:414-9.
28. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, During von V, Skjaerven R, Gunnell D, et al. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2008;372:737-43.
29. Henningsen A-K, Pinborg A, Lidegaard Ø, Vestergaard C, Forman JL, Andersen AN. Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study. Fertil Steril 2011;95:959-63.
30. Källén BB, Finnström OO, Lindam AA, Nilsson EE, Nygren KG, Olausson PP. Trends in delivery and neonatal outcome after in vitro fertilization in Sweden: data for 25 years. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1026-34.
31. van Kasteren YM, Schoemaker J. Premature ovarian failure: a systematic review on therapeutic interventions to restore ovarian function and achieve pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update 1999;5:483-92.
32. Bidet M, Bachelot A, Bissauge E, Golmard JL, Gricourt S, Dulon J, et al. Resumption of ovarian function and pregnancies in 358 patients with premature ovarian failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:3864-72.
33. Donckers J, Evers JL, Land JA. The long-term outcome of 946 consecutive couples visiting a fertility clinic in 2001-2003. Fertil Steril 2011;96:160-4.
34. Fauser BC, Devroey P, Macklon NS. Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment. Lancet 2005;365:1807-16.
35. Ombelet W. Perinatal outcome of 12,021 singleton and 3108 twin births after non-IVF-assisted reproduction: a cohort study. Hum Reprod 2005;21:1025-32.
36. Peterson CM, Hatasaka HH, Jones KP, Poulson AM, Carrell DT, Urry RL. Ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination compared with in vitro fertilization and no therapy: a prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1994;62:535-44.
37. Santos F, Hyslop L, Stojkovic P, Leary C, Murdoch A, Reik W, et al. Evaluation of epigenetic marks in human embryos derived from IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod 2010;25:2387-95.
38. Kramer MS, Wilkins R, Goulet L, Séguin L, Lydon J, Kahn SR, et al. Investigating socio-economic disparities in preterm birth: evidence for selective study participation and selection bias. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009;23:301-9.
39. Klemetti R, Sevón T, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Health of children born after ovulation induction. Fertil Steril 2010;93:1157-68.
40. Wang JX, Norman RJ, Kristiansson P. The effect of various infertility treatments on the risk of preterm birth. Hum Reprod 2002;17:945-9.
41. Wisborg K, Ingerslev HJ, Henriksen TB. In vitro fertilization and preterm delivery, low birth weight, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit: a prospective follow-up study. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2102-6.
42. Deng S, Xu J, Zeng J, Hu L, Wu Y. Ovarian stimulation leads to a severe implantation defect in mice. Reprod Biomed Online 2013;27:172-5.
43. Tremellen K. Oxidative stress and male infertility - a clinical perspective. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:243-58.
44. Guz J, Gackowski D, Foksinski M, Rozalski R, Zarakowska E, Siomek A. Comparison of oxidative stress/DNA damage in semen and blood of fertile and infertile men. PLoS One 2013;8:e68490.
45. Saleh RA, Agarwal A. Oxidative stress and male infertility: from research bench to clinical practice. J Androl 2002;23:737-52.
46. Aitken RJ. Falling sperm counts twenty years on: where are we now? Asian J Androl 2013;15:204-7.
47. Borini A, Tarozzi N, Bizzaro D, Bonu MA, Fava L. Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2876-81.