Philosophy of international law

Philosophy of International Law

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-255

  Carty, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923584506     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (230)

1. A. J. Arnaud (1993), entries by Sylvie Cimamonti and Aulis Aarnio, respectively.
2. Annick Perrot, La Doctrine et l’hy- pothèse du declin du droit (1993) 180, the entire article.
3. Ludwig Ehrlich (ed.), Works of Paulus Vladimiri (A Selection) (1968) Vol. II, from 1st Tractatus (1417), 203.
4. Stanislaus F. Belch, Paulus Vladimiri and his Doctrine Concerning International Law and Politics (1965), Vol. 1, 213-14.
5. P. Haggenmacher, Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste (1983).
6. Jens Bartelson, A Genealogy of Sovereignty (1995) 128.
7. E. Jouannet, ‘L’Emergence doctrinale du droit international classique. Emer de Vattel et l’école du droit de la nature et des gens,’ PhD thesis, Paris, 1993, 447-8, 458-9.
8. Bartelson, ‘How Policy Became Foreign,’ 194-5.
9. Anthony Carty, ‘Critical International Law: Recent Trends in the Theory of International Law,’ in The European Journal of International Law V. 2 (1991) 66-95.
10. John Tasioulas, ‘In Defence of Relative Normativity: Communitarian Values and the Nicaragua Case,’ Ox. JLS 16 (1996) 85-128.
11. M. Koskenniemi, ‘The Future of Statehood,’ 32 Harvard ILJ (1991) 397 at 407.
12. Tasioulas, ‘In Defence of Relative Normativity,’ 128.
13. A. Carty, ‘Why Theory? - The Implications for International Law Teaching,’ in Theory and International Law, An Introduction, 75, 77.
14. J. Crawford, ‘Public International Law in Twentieth-century England,’ in J. Beatson and R. Zimmermann (eds), Jurists Uprooted, Germanspeaking Émigré Lawyers in Twentieth-century Britain (2004) 681 at 699.
15. J. Crawford, ‘Public International Law in Twentieth-century England,’ 686 and 689.
16. D. H. N. Johnson, ‘The English Tradition in International Law,’ International and Comparative Law Quarterly 11 (1962) 416, at 425.
17. R. Y. Jennings, ‘The State of International Law Today,’ Journal of the Society of the Public Teachers of Law (1957-58) 95 at 96.
18. Crawford, ‘Public International Law in Twentieth-century England,’ 700.
19. A. Carty, ‘Visions of the Past of International Society, Law, History or Politics,’ in the Modern Law Review 69(4) (Spring 2006), 644-60.
20. David Kennedy, ‘The Move to Institutions,’ Cardozo Law Review 8 (1987), 841, esp. to 849.
21. Casper Sylvest, ‘International Law in 19th Century Britain,’ British Yearbook of International Law, LXXV (2004) 9-70;
22. John Anthony Carty ‘19th Century Textbooks on International Law,’ unpublished thesis, Cambridge University, 1973.
23. Carty, ‘Why Theory? - The Implications for International Law Teaching,’ 79-82
24. J. Brierly, The Basis of Obligation in International Law, and Other Papers, ed. H. Lauterpacht (1958) 41-2.
25. Johnson, ‘The English Tradition in International Law,’ 432.
26. Correlli Barnett, The Verdict of Peace (2001) 51-2.
27. Bartelson, A Genealogy of Sovereignty, 188-201.
28. Jane E. Nijman, International Legal Personality (2004) 85-243.
29. Anthony Carty, ‘Convergences and Divergences in European International Law Traditions,’ European Journal of International Law 11 (2000) 713
30. Paul Ricoeur, The Conflict of Interpretations.
31. Anthony Carty, ‘Scandinavian Realism and Phenomenological Approaches to Statehood and General Custom in International Law,’ European Journal of International Law 14 (2003) 817, esp. 836-40
32. Carty, ‘Critical International Law,’ 67-70.
33. A. Carty, ‘Interwar German Theories of International Law: The Psychoanalytical and Phenomenological Perspectives of Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt,’ Cardozo Law Review 16 (1995) 1235-92.
34. Carty, ‘Why Theory - Implications for International Law Teaching,’ 73, 97-9.
35. ICJ Reports (1969), 3 at 77
36. M. Sorensen, Les sources du droit international (1946) esp 109.
37. A. D’Amato, The Concept of Custom in International Law (1971) 82-4.
38. L’Unité de l’ordre juridique international, Cours général de droit international public (2003) 160.
39. N. K. Hevener on the 1971 South West Africa opinion, ‘A New International Legal Philosophy,’ 24 ICLQ (1975) 90, at 793-4.
40. R. Churchill on the Fisheries Jurisdiction Cases, ‘The Contribution of the ICJ to the Debate on Coastal Fisheries Rights,’ 24 ICLQ (1975) 82.
41. G. de Lacharrière, La Politique juridique éxterieure (1983).
42. R. J. Dupuy, La Communauté internationale entre le mythe et l’histoire (1986).
43. T. Carty, ‘The Origins of the Doctrine of Deterrence and the Legal Status of Nuclear Weapons,’ in H. Davis, (ed.) Ethics and Defence (1986) 132.
44. T. Carty, ‘Legality and Nuclear Weapons: Doctrines of Nuclear Warfighting,’ Davis, Ethics and Defence, 152.
45. J. Garrison, The Darkness of God: Theology after Hiroshima, (1982) 29-33.
46. Carty, The Decay of International Law, 111-13.
47. C. Guttierrez Espada, El Estado de necessidad y el uso de la fuera en derecho internacional (1987), a comprehensive review of the treatment of the issue by the ILC at 47-59
48. Regina v. Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis ex parte Pinochet, March 24, 1999, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld/ldjudgmt.htm.
49. M. Akehurst, ‘The Concept of Custom in International Law,’ BYIL 47 (1974-5) 195.
50. A. Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (1999) 179.
51. A. Rivier, Principes du droit des gens (1896) 35, C. Rousseau, Droit international public, vol. 1, (1970) 324, and P. Guggenheim, ‘Contribution à l’histoire des sources du droit des gens,’ 94 Hague Received (1958) 53.
52. F. von Holtzendorff and A. Rivier, Introduction au droit des gens. The reliance of the textbook on this work is quite explicit, e.g. 27, 31, and 37
53. A. Rivier by M. E. Lehr, Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International XVII (1898) 415, 429
54. J. Habermas, L’Espace public (1986). This part of the argument draws upon what the author has already written in his ‘Changing Models of the International System,’ in W. E. Butler (ed.), Perestroika and International Law (1990) 13-30
55. E. Nys, ‘Alphonse Rivier, sa vie et ses oeuvres,’ Revue de droit international XXXI (1899) 342, 344
56. M. Mancini, in G. Rolin-Jaequemyns, De la necessité d’organiser une institution scientifique permanente pour favoriser l’ etude et les progrés du droit international, Revue de droit international V (1873) 463 at 706.
57. R. P. Dhokalia, The Codification of International Law less (1970).
58. R. Albrecht-Carrie, A Diplomatic History of Europe (1967) 152-3.
59. A. J. Mayer, The Persistence of the Old Regime (1981) 79-127.
60. A. Carty, ‘Scandinavian Realism and Phenomenological Approaches to State and General Customary Law,’ EJIL 14 (2003) 817-41.
61. A. Carty and R. Smith, Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice and the World Crisis, a Legal Adviser in the Foreign Office 1932 1945 (2000) 25 ff.
62. A. Carty, ‘Critical International Law: Recent Trends in the Theory of International Law,’ EJIL 2 (1991) 66-96.
63. A. Carty and R. Smith (eds), Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice and the World Crisis: A Legal Adviser in the Foreign Office (1932-1945) (2000) 23-7.
64. M. Mendelson, ‘The Subjective Element in Customary International Law,’ BYIL 66 (1995) 177.
65. G. Marston, ‘The Evidences of British State Practice in the Field of International Law,’ in A. Carty and G. Danilenko (eds), Perestroika and International Law, Current Anglo-Soviet Approaches to International Law (1990) 35
66. A. Aust, ‘The Theory and Practice of Informal International Instruments,’ 35 ICLQ (1986) 787.
67. A. Carty, ‘The UK, the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the ICJ and the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes,’ in Carty and G. Danilenko (eds) Perestroika and International Law, 131-3.
68. M. Curtis, The Ambiguities of Power: British Foreign Policy since 1945 (1995)
69. Curtis, The Great Deception: Anglo-American Power and World Order (1998).
70. G. Marston (ed.), ‘United Kingdom Materials on International Law,’ BYIL (1986) 57. 614-20.
71. Curtis, The Ambiguities of Power: British Foreign Policy since 1945, 98-9.
72. Dobson, ‘The Great Deception (Book Review),’ 74 International Affairs (1998) 923-4.
73. E. Lauterpacht, ‘Contemporary Practice of the United Kingdom,’ ICLQ 7 (1958) 99-109.
74. Dorril, MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations (2000) 729-35.
75. M. Curtis, Web of Deceit: Britain’s Real Role in the World (2003) 279.
76. J. Bartelson, A Genealogy of Sovereignty (1995), especially chapter 5.
77. R. Cooper, The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century (2003) especially 16-37.
78. ICJ Reports(1986) 554 and especially para. 20.
79. International Law Reports92 (1994) 170.
80. UNGA Declaration on the Principles of Friendly Relations among States GA Res 2625, 25 UNOR (1970).
81. Democratic Governance and International Lawed. G. Fox and B. Roth (2000).
82. Glanville L. Williams, ‘International Law and the Controversy Concerning the Word Law’ in the BYBIL(1945) 146 ff.
83. A. Cassese, International Law(2001) 47.
84. Dietmar Willoweit, Rechtsgrundlagen der Territorialgewalt(1975), esp. 123–5, 126, 129–31.
85. G. W. Gong, The Standard of Civilisation in International Society, (1984), 16.
86. James Crawford, ‘State Practice and International Law in Relation to Secession,’ BYBIL(1998) 85 at 114.
87. A. Carty, The Decay of International Law (1996) 55–6.
88. Crawford J., ‘State Practice and International Law in Relation to Secession,’ 102–3.
89. J. Bartelson, A Genealogy of Sovereignty(1995) 128.
90. Immanuel Kant, Perpetual Peace and Other Essays, trans. T. Humphrey (1982) 355.
91. A. Carty, ‘Why Theory, Implications for International Law Teaching,’ Theory and International Law, An Introduction(1990) 73 at 97–9.
92. Bartelson, A Genealogy of Sovereignty, 188–201.
93. Jean Combacau and Serge Sur, Droit international public, 1st edition (1993, the edition used here unless otherwise stated: there is now a 4th edition, 1999).
94. Marie-Christine Kessler, La Politique étrangère de la France, acteurs et processus(1999), esp. 153–65
95. Maxime Lefebvre, Le Jeu du droit et de la puissance: Précis de relations internationales(1997) esp. 68, 72, 105, 123–30, 151, 158–60 and 192–205
96. Nguyen Quoc Dinh, Patrick Daillier, and Alain Pellet, Droit International Public, 6th edition (1999)
97. Denis Alland, Droit International Public(2000)
98. Francis Ruddy, ‘The Origins of the Ideas of Vattel,’ PhD thesis, University Of Cambridge (1969).
99. Presse Universitaire de France: Paris, 1999.
100. Lejbowicz, Philosophie, 143ff.
101. Völkerrechted. Knut Ipsen, 4th edition (1999), and Völkerrecht, ed. Wolfgang Graf Vitzthum (1997)
102. Muller Verlag: Heidelberg, 1998.
103. Döhring, Volkerrecht, 3–4.
104. Bartelson, A Genealogy of Sovereignty.
105. Lejbowicz, Philosophie, 407–16, quotation at 416.
106. Bartelson, A Genealogy of Sovereignty, 188–201.
107. Brierly, The Law of Nations(1963) 39–40.
108. I. Kant, Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History and Morals, trans. and ed. T. Humphrey (1982) 355.
109. J. Bartelson, A Genealogy of Sovereignty(1995) 194–5.
110. International Lawvol. 1 (1992/6) 135–6.
111. E. Jouannet, L’Emergence: Part II Autonomisation du droit des gens(1993) esp. 141–7.
112. Bartelson, A Genealogy of Sovereignty, esp. 137–85.
113. Jouannet, Autonomisation, 447.
114. B. Stoitzner, ‘Die Lehre vom Stufenbau der Rechtsordnung,’ in S. Paulson and, B.Walter, Untersuchungen zur Reinen Rechtslehre(1986), 50 at 76
115. T. Ohlinger, Der Völkerrechtliche Vertrag(1975).
116. H. Kelsen, Der soziologische und der juristische Staatsbegriff(1928) 137.
117. H. Kelsen, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts(1920-1928), 230–1, 239–41.
118. H. Kelsen, Collective Security under International Law(1954) 18.
119. C. Tournaye, Kelsen et la securité collective(1995) 43–4.
120. O. Pfersmann, ‘De la justice constitutionnelle à la justice internationale: Hans Kelsen et la seconde guerre mondiale,’ Revue française de droit constitutionnel16 (1993) 761 at 788–9.
121. Richard Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace, Political Thought and The International Order from Grotius to Kant(1999) 130.
122. Hobbes, On the Citizen, I, 2 by Tuck, at 134.
123. Anthony Carty ‘English Constitutional Law from a Postmodernist Perspective,’ in Dangerous Supplements, ed. Peter Fitzpatrick (1991) 182–206.
124. Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. C. B. McPherson (1968), chapter 42, 567.
125. Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace, 170–1.
126. The Law of Nations, vol. II, 1, 7.
127. Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace, 195–6.
128. John Kampfner, Blair’s War(2004) 152.
129. Mark Curtis, Unpeople, Britain’s Secret Human Rights Abuses(2004).
130. Robert Cooper, The Breaking of Nations(2004).
131. International and Comparative Law Quarterly52 (2003) 811.
132. The Dilemma of Zealous Nationalism(2003)
133. AJIL97, No. 3 (July 2003) 628-42.
134. The United Statesetc., 155 and 161.
135. AJIL97, No. 3 (July 2003) 585-90.
136. AJIL97 No. 3 (2003) 576-85.
137. AJIL97 (2003) 563-76.
138. M. Hardt and A. Negri, Empire(2000).
139. D. Harvey, The New Imperialism(2003) 29-32.
140. P. Bobbitt, The Shield of Achilles: War and Peace and the Course of History(2002) xxxii.
141. M. Byers and G. Nolte, The United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law(2003) 98.
142. O. Bennett, Cultural Pessimism, Narratives of Decline in the Post-Modern World(2001) 146.
143. A. Callinicos, Against Postmodernism(1989) 82.
144. Bennett, Cultural Pessimism, 16.
145. Callinicos, Against Postmodernism, 84-6.
146. Hardt and Negri, Empire, 31.
147. J. Stiglitz, Globalization and its Discontents(2002).
148. E. Todd, Weltmacht, USA Ein Nachruf (2003) 95
149. G. Arrighi and B. J. Silver (eds), Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System(1999) generally, and especially Chapter 1, ‘Geopolitics and High Finance,’ 37-96.
150. Arrighi and Silver, Chaos, 284, Harvey, New Imperialism, 128-9
151. Todd, Weltmacht USA, 117-19
152. Arrighi and Silver, Chaos, 137, 147.
153. Harvey, New Imperialism, 48-9.
154. Todd, Weltmacht USA, 115-16.
155. Arrighi and Silver, Chaos, 88-96, 284.
156. Arrighi and Silver, Chaos, 219-46.
157. Harvey, The New Imperialism, 144.
158. Arrighi and Silver, Chaos, 205-11.
159. W. Hutton, The World We Are In(2001), 234-9.
160. Harvey, The New Imperialism, 127-32, ‘The Powers of Mediating Institutions.’
161. V. Kubalkova and A. Cruickshank, Marxism and International Relations(1989)
162. Arrighi and Sliver, Chaos, 92.
163. P. Bobbitt, The Shield of Achilles: War and Peace and the Course of History(2002).
164. Harvey, The New Imperialism, 153-4.
165. Todd, Weltmacht USA, 32-6.
166. A Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics(1999), 178.
167. D. Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity(1989)
168. Harvey, The New Imperialism, 141-2.
169. Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics180-1.
170. John Rawls, Le Droit des gens, intro. Betrand Guillarme (1996), 51.
171. Teson, Philosophy of International Law, 120.
172. Susan Marks, The Riddle of All Consitutions, International Law, Democracy and The Critique of Ideology(2000).
173. Alain Joxe, Empire of Disorder(2002).
174. Mary Kaldor, New and Old Wars. Organised Violence in a Global Era(1999).
175. H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law(1961), 116–17.
176. Sir Ian Sinclair, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties2nd edition (1984)
177. Anthony Aust, Modem Treaty Law and Practice(2000).
178. Michel Schooyans, La Face cachée de L’·ONU(2000), at 222–23.
179. Schooyans, La Face cachée de L’·ONU, 37.
180. W. Butler (ed.), Perestroika and International Law(1990) 13–30.
181. Alistair MacIntyre in After Virtue(1987).
182. ‘Critical International Law, Recent Trends in the Theory of International Law,’ EJIL2 (1991) 66–96.
183. Anthony Carty (ed.), Post-modern Law(1990) ‘Postmodernism in the Theory and Sociology of Law,’ at 82–5
184. Gregory Fox and Brad Roth (eds), Democratic Governance and International Law(2000)
185. Hart, The Concept of Law, 116–17.
186. H. L. A. Hart, ‘Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence’, 70 LQR(1954) 37 at 48.
187. Schooyans, ‘L’ Empire du consensus’, 136–41.
188. Hart, ‘Definition and Theory’, 48–9.
189. Richard Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace. Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant(1999) 130.
190. Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. C. B. McPhearson (1968) 556–7.
191. Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace, 202.
192. A. Carty, ‘The Continuing Influence of Kelsen on the General Perception of the Discipline of International Law,’ EJIL(1998) 344–54.
193. Schooyans, ‘L’Empire du consensus’, 157–66, esp. 159.
194. M. K. Green, ‘Cultural Themes in European Philosophy, Law and Economics’, History of European Ideas19 (1994) 805, at 805–6.
195. Linda Weiss, The Myth of the Powerless State, Governing in a Global Era(1998) 69–72.
196. D. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance(1990).
197. G. Dunkley, The Free Trade Adventure(2000) 162.
198. Robert Biel, The New Imperialism, Crisis and Contradiction in North/South Relations(2000) 1–130.
199. Hans-Erich Volkmann, ‘Die NS-Wirtschaft in Vorbereitung des Krieges,’ in Wilhelm Deist et al. (eds), Ursachen und Voraussetzungen des Zweiten Weltkrieges(1989), 211–435.
200. Biel, The New Imperialism, 183 and what follows, 184–5.
201. Robert McCrum, ‘They Are Talking Our Language,’ The Observer(Review), March 18, 2001.
202. Ruth Grant and Robert Keohane, ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics,’ American Political Science Review99, no. 1 (February 2005) 29, at 33.
203. Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Towards a New Common Sense: Law Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition(1995) 36–7, and generally 11–37.
204. Roberto M. Unger, What Should Legal Analysis Become? (1996) 96.
205. Leon Petrazycki, Law and Morality(1954)
206. George S. Langrod and Michelina Vaughan, ‘The Polish Psychological Theory of Law,’ in Polish Law Through the Ages, ed. W. J. Wagner (1970) 299–362.
207. Unger, What Should Legal Analysis Become?123–5.
208. Nicholas Mercuro and Steven G. Medema, Economics and the Law: From Posner to Post-Modernism(1997) 165–9.
209. Unger, What Should Legal Analysis Become? 109.
210. R. Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace, Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant, 2001.
211. Paul Ricoeur, Parcours de la reconnaissance(2004) 241.
212. Molly Mann, ‘Ricoeur’s Dialectic of Solicitous Giving and Receiving: Instruction, Recognition and Justice,’ 20-1: Paper Presented at the Colloquium, ‘Thinking the Present,’ University of California at Berkeley, May 2005, http://www.criticalsense.berkeley.edu/mann.pdf.
213. Paul Ricoeur and Contemporary Moral Thought, ed. John Wall, (1992)
214. Mann, Ricoeur’s Dialectic, 23, quoting Riceour, The Just(2000) 37
215. Paul Keal, European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples(2003), 56 ff.
216. Anthony Pagden, European Encounters with the New World(1994).
217. Gong, quoting Lewis, in The Standard of “Civilisation” in International Society(1984) 108.
218. A. L. Macfie, Orientalism, A Reader(2000), 4.
219. A. Carty, ‘Scandinavian Realism and Phenomenological Approaches to Statehood and General Custom in International Law’ 14, EJIL(2003) 817, at 820.
220. Jürgen Habermas, Der gespaltene Westen(2004) 113 at 146.
221. Manuchehr Sanadjian, ‘Fetishised Liberty, the Fear of the Other and the Global Juridical Rule in Iraq,’ Social Identities10 (2004) 665 at 666.
222. James Der Derian, On Diplomacy, A Genealogy of Western Estrangement(1987).
223. James Der Derian and Michael J. Shapiro, International/Intertextual Relations(1989).
224. Richard and Ashley, ‘Living on Borderlines: Man, Poststructuralism and War,’ and William E. Connolly, ‘Identity and Difference in Global Politics.’
225. M. Hardt and A. Negri, Empire(2000).
226. M. Foucault, The Order of Things, An Archeology of the Human Sciences(1970).
227. J. Nijman, The Concept of International Legal Personality: An Inquiry into the History and Theory of International Law(2004) 377-8.
228. Nijman, The Concept of International Legal Personality, esp. chapter 3.
229. Barry Buzan, People, States and Fear(1982).
230. Plessner, The Limits of Community, the translator’s introduction, Wallace, esp. 9-16.