Soundscape planning as a complement to environmental noise management

INTERNOISE 2014 - 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Brown, A L ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Environmental noise; Planning; Quiet; Soundscape

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC VARIABLES CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; PLANNING;

ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE; ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MANAGEMENTS; HUMAN RESPONSE; MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES; PLANNING AND DESIGN; QUIET; SOUNDSCAPES;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

EID: 84923569011     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Torrigoe K. Insights taken from three visited soundscapes in Japan, Australian Forum for Acoustic Ecology. 2003.
2. Truax B. Models and strategies for acoustic design, Papers presented at the "Stockholm, Hey Listen!" Conference, June 8-16, The Royal Swedish Academy of Music, 1998.
3. Brown AL, Kang J, Gjestland T. Towards standardization in soundscape preference assessment. Applied Acoustics, 2011; 72, 387-392.
4. Pijanowski, BC, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Dumyahn SL et al. Soundscape ecology: The science of sound in the landscape. BioScience 2011; 61, 3: 203-216.
5. U.S. National Parks Service Report to congress. Report on effects of aircraft overflights on the National Parks system. Washington D.C. 1995. http://www.nonoise.org/library/npreport/intro.htm#top [Accessed 31 August 2014].
6. Augoyard J.-F. The cricket effect. Which tools for the research on sonic urban ambiences? Papers presented at the "Stockholm, Hey Listen!" Conference, The Royal Swedish Academy of Music.1998.
7. Schafer RM, The Tuning of the World, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1977.
8. Maher RC. White Paper: Obtaining long-term soundscape inventories in the US National Park System. 2004.
9. Yang W, Kang J. Soundscape and sound preferences in urban squares: A case study in Sheffield. Journal of Urban Design 2005; 10:61-80.
10. Truax B. Handbook for acoustic ecology (2nd Edition). 1999.Cambridge Street Publishing.
11. Schulte-Fortkamp B, Lercher P. The importance of soundscape research for the assessment of noise annoyance at the level of the community. Tecni Acustica, 2003, Bilbao.
12. Newman P, Manning R, Trevino K. From landscapes to soundscapes: Introduction to the special issue. Parks Science 2009; 26 (3).
13. Gage S, Ummadi P, Shortridge A, Qi J, Jella PK.. Using GIS to develop a network of acoustic environmental sensors. In: ESRI International Users Conference, 15-28. 2004 San Diego, CA, USA.
14. Gjestland T. Reporting physical parameters of soundscape studies, In: Acoustics 2012, Nantes, France.
15. Kihlman T, Kropp W. Soundscape support to health: A cross-disciplinary research programme. In: InterNoise 2001, The Hague, The Netherlands.
16. Copeland C. Clean Water Act: A summary of the Law, CRS Report for Congress, January 24, (2002). http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/laws/majorlaw/cwa.pdf [Accessed 22 June, 2007].
17. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, Creating space, sharing space, Fifth Spatial Planning Policy Memorandum 2000/2020, The Hague, 2001.
18. Raimbault M, Dubois D. Urban soundscapes: experiences and knowledge. Cities, 22(5), 339-350, (2005).
19. Schulte-Fortkamp B, Brooks BM, Bray WR. Soundscape: An approach to rely on human perception and expertise in the post-modern community noise era, Acoustics Today, 2007; 7-15, January.
20. Davies W, Adams M, Bruce N, Marselle M, Cain R, Jennings P, Hall D, Irwin A, Hume K, Plack C. The Positive Soundscapes Project: A synthesis of results of many disciplines, Proc. INTER-NOISE 09, 2009.
21. Dubois D, Guastavino C, Raimbault M. A cognitive approach to urban soundscapes: using verbal data to access everyday life auditory categories Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 2006; 92(6), 865-874.
22. Brown AL. Rethinking "Quiet Areas" as "Areas of High Acoustic Quality", Proc. INTER-NOISE 06, Honolulu, 2006.
23. Lavandier C, Defréville B. The contribution of sound source characteristics in the assessment of urban soundscapes, Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2006; 92(6), 912-921.
24. Genuit K, Fiebig A. Psychoacoustics and its benefit for the soundscape approach, Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2006; 92(6), 952-958.
25. Raimbault M, Lavandier C, Berengier M. Ambient sound assessments in or urban environments: field studies in two French cities. Applied Acoustics 2003; 64, 1341-1256.
26. Semidor C. Characterization of urban soundscape using psychoacoustic criteria. Proceedings of INTER-NOISE 05, Rio de Janerio, 2005.
27. De Coensel B, Booteldooren D. The quiet rural soundscape and how to characterize it. Acta Acoustica united with Acustica 2006; 92 (6) 887-897.
28. Booteldooren D, De Coensel B, De Muer T. The temporal structure of urban soundscapes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006; 292, 105-123.
29. Brown AL, Muhar A. An approach to the acoustic design of outdoor space, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2004; 47(6), 827-842.
30. Rossman B. The science of sound: Acoustics and soundscape measurement. In Harmon, D. (ed) People, Places and Parks: Proceedings of the 2005 George Wright Society Conference on Parks, Protected Area, and Cultural Sites. Hancock, Michigan: The George Wright Society.
31. Connor TL. The search for more meaningful aircraft noise analysis in support of more effective airport planning. Noise-Con 2007; Reno Nevada.
32. European Environment Agency. Good practice guide on quiet areas. EEA Technical Report No 4/2014. Luxembourg.
33. Brambilla G, Maffei L. Responses to noise in urban parks and in rural quiet areas, Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2006; 92(6), 881-886.
34. Campaign to Protect Rural England, "Tranquility". http://www.cpre.org.uk/campaigns/landscape/tranquility. [Accessed 22 June, 2007].
35. Adams M, Davies B Bruce N. Soundscapes: An urban planning map, Proc. INTER-NOISE 09, in09-857, 2009.
36. PPG24 PlanningPolicy Guidance 21: Planning and Noise 1994. London: HMSO.
37. Zwerling E. Noise enforcement in cities, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004; 115(5), 2593.
38. Porteous JD, Mastin JF. Soundscape, Journal of Architecture and Planning Research; 1985, 19, 169-196.
39. Kang J. Urban Sound Environment, 2007, Taylor and Francis, London.
40. Brambilla G, Maffei, L. Perspectives of the soundscape approach as a tool for urban space design. Noise Control Eng. J. 2011; 58 (5), 532-539.
41. Hedfors P, Berg PG. The sounds of two landscape settings: Auditory concepts for physical planning and design, Landscape Research, 2003; 28(3) 245-263.
42. Picher EJ, Newman P, Manning RE. Understanding and managing experiential aspects of soundscapes at Muir Woods National Monument. Environmental Management 2009; 43(3), 425-435.
43. Zhang M, Kang J. Evaluation of urban soundscapes by future architects, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004; 115(5), 2497.
44. Derbal CR, Zeghlache H. Recomposition of the urban sonic environment, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2006; 119(5), 3261.
45. Kang J, Chourmouziadou K, Sakantamis K, Wang B, Hao Y. COST Action TD0804 - Soundscape of European Cities and Landscape. 2013, e-book First Edition Published in Oxford by Soundscape-COST.
46. Genuit K. The need for transdisciplinary actions - psychoacoustics, sound quality, soundscape and environmental noise. Proc. INTER-NOISE 13, Innsbruck, Austria, 2013.