Incidence of clinically significant percutaneous spinal cord stimulator lead migration

Neuromodulation

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 123-125

  Gazelka, Halena M ^a   Freeman, Eric D ^b   Hooten, W Michael ^a   Eldrige, Jason S ^a   Hoelzer, Bryan C ^a   Mauck, William D ^a   Moeschler, Susan M ^a   Pingree, Matthew J ^a   Rho, Richard H ^a   Lamer, Tim J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b Rockford Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Neuromodulation; revision; stimulator

Indexed keywords

ADULT; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; REVIEW; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LEAD MIGRATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; FEMALE; FOREIGN-BODY MIGRATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINAL CORD; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION;

ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; FOREIGN-BODY MIGRATION; HUMANS; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL CORD; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION;

EID: 84923559717     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: 15251403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12184     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, et al. Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain 2007; 132: 179-188.
2. North RB, Kumar K, Wallace MS, et al. Spinal cord stimulation versus re-operation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (EVIDENCE study). Neuromodulation 2011; 14: 330-335.
3. Cameron T,. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg 2004; 100 (3 Suppl. Spine): 254-267.
4. Mekhail NA, Mathews M, Nageeb F, Guirguis M, Mekhail MN, Cheng J,. Retrospective review of 707 cases of spinal cord stimulation: Indications and complications. Pain Pract 2011; 11: 148-153.
5. Kumar K, Buchser E, Linderoth B, Meglio M, Van Buyten JP,. Avoiding complications from spinal cord stimulation: practical recommendations from an international panel of experts. Neuromodulation 2007; 10: 24-33.
6. Lad SP, Kalanithi PS, Arrigo RT, et al. A socioeconomic survey of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) surgery. Neuromodulation 2010; 13: 265-268.
7. Turner JA, Loeser JD, Deyo RA, Sanders SB,. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain 2004; 108: 137-147.
8. North RB, Lanning A, Hessels R, Cutchis PN,. Spinal cord stimulation with percutaneous and plate electrodes: side effects and quantitative comparisons. Neurosurg Focus 1997; 2: e3.
9. Villavicencio AT, Leveque JC, Rubin L, Bulsara K, Gorecki JP,. Laminectomy versus percutaneous electrode placement for spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 2000; 46: 399-405.
10. Eldabe S, Kumar K, Buchser E, Taylor RS,. An analysis of the components of pain, function, and health-related quality of life in patients with failed back surgery syndrome treated with spinal cord stimulation or conventional medical management. Neuromodulation 2010; 13: 201-209.
11. Taylor RS, Ryan J, O'Donnell R, Eldabe S, Kumar K, North RB,. The cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Clin J Pain 2010; 26: 463-469.