1000 Norms Project: Protocol of a cross-sectional study cataloging human variation

Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 50-56

  McKay, Marnee J ^a   Baldwin, Jennifer N ^a   Ferreira, Paulo ^a   Simic, Milena ^a   Vanicek, Natalie ^a   Hiller, Claire E ^a   Nightingale, Elizabeth J ^a   Moloney, Niamh A ^a   Quinlan, Kate G ^b,c   Pourkazemi, Fereshteh ^a   Sman, Amy D ^a,b   Nicholson, Leslie L ^a,c   Mousavi, Seyed J ^a   Rose, Kristy ^b   Raymond, Jacqueline ^a   Mackey, Martin G ^a   Chard, Angus ^a   Hübscher, Markus ^a   Wegener, Caleb ^a   Fong Yan, Alycia ^a   Refshauge, Kathryn M ^a   Burns, Joshua ^a,b,c   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL AT WESTMEAD   (Australia)

^c University of Sydney   (Australia)

Author keywords

Healthy; Lifespan; Physical assessment; Reference values

Indexed keywords

ALPHA ACTININ 3; DNA;

1000 NORM PROJECT DATABASE; ACTN3 GENE; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GENE; HUMAN; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION; NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PREDICTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REFERENCE VALUE; SALIVA ANALYSIS; SELF REPORT; SEX DIFFERENCE; VERY ELDERLY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EXERCISE; HEALTH STATUS; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; STANDARDS; WORK CAPACITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REFERENCE VALUES; SELF EFFICACY; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; WORK CAPACITY EVALUATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923547581     PISSN: 00319406     EISSN: 18731465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Gabriel S.E., Normand S.-L.T. Getting the methods right-the foundation of patient-centered outcomes research. N Engl J Med 2012, 367(August (9)):787-790.
2. Solomon D.H., Gabriel S.E. A call for evidence-based quality measures: a goal worthy of pursuit. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2007, 3(July (7)):363.
3. Dekker J., Dallmeijer A.J., Lankhorst G.J. Clinimetrics in rehabilitation medicine: current issues in developing and applying measurement instruments 1. J Rehabil Med 2005, 37(4):193-201.
4. Hammond R. Evaluation of physiotherapy by measuring the outcome. Physiotherapy 2000, 86(4):170-172.
5. Beattie P. Measurement of health outcomes in the clinical setting: applications to physiotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract 2001, 17(3):173-185.
6. Gräsbeck R. The evolution of the reference value concept. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004, 42(7):692-697.
7. Peters M.J.H., van Nes S.I., Vanhoutte E.K., Bakkers M., van Doorn P.A., Merkies I.S.J., et al. Revised normative values for grip strength with the Jamar dynamometer. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2011 Mar, 16(1):47-50.
8. Soucie J.M., Wang C., Forsyth A., Funk S., Denny M., Roach K.E., et al. Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia 2011, 17(May (3)):500-507.
9. Danneskiold-Samsøe B., Bartels E., Bülow P., Lund H., Stockmarr A., Holm C., et al. Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength in a healthy population with special reference to age and gender. Acta Psychol 2009, 197(s673):1-68.
10. Bohannon R.W., Williams A.A. Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 2011, 97(3):182-189.
11. Petitclerc C. Normality: the unreachable star?. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004, 42(7):698-701.
12. Gershon R.C., Cella D., Fox N.A., Havlik R.J., Hendrie H.C., Wagster M.V. Assessment of neurological and behavioural function: the NIH Toolbox. Lancet Neurol 2010, 9(2):138-139.
13. Daly R.M., Ahlborg H.G., Ringsberg K., Gardsell P., Sernbo I., Karlsson M.K. Association between changes in habitual physical activity and changes in bone density, muscle strength, and functional performance in elderly men and women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008, 56(12):2252-2260.
14. Garatachea N., Lucía A. Genes and the ageing muscle: a review on genetic association studies. Age 2013, 35(1):207-233.
15. North K.N., Yang N., Wattanasirichaigoon D., Mills M., Easteal S., Beggs A.H. A common nonsense mutation results in α-actinin-deficiency in the general population. Nat Genet 1999, 21(4):353-354.
16. Yang N., MacArthur D.G., Gulbin J.P., Hahn A.G., Beggs A.H., Easteal S., et al. ACTN3 genotype is associated with human elite athletic performance. Am J Hum Genet 2003, 73(3):627-631.
17. Santiago C., González-Freire M., Serratosa L., Morate F.J., Meyer T., Gómez-Gallego F., et al. ACTN3 genotype in professional soccer players. Br J Sports Med 2008, 42(1):71-73.
18. Niemi A.-K., Majamaa K., Mitochondrial D.N.A. and ACTN3 genotypes in Finnish elite endurance and sprint athletes. Eur J Hum Genet 2005, 13(8):965-969.
19. Hagberg J.M., Rankinen T., Loos R.J., Pérusse L., Roth S.M., Wolfarth B., et al. Advances in exercise, fitness, and performance genomics in 2010. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43(5):743.
20. Delmonico M.J., Zmuda J.M., Taylor B.C., Cauley J.A., Harris T.B., Manini T.M., et al. Association of the ACTN3 genotype and physical functioning with age in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008, 63(11):1227-1234.
21. Delmonico M.J., Kostek M.C., Doldo N.A., Hand B.D., Walsh S., Conway J.M., et al. Alpha-actinin-(ACTN3) R577X polymorphism influences knee extensor peak power response to strength training in older men and women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007, 62(2):206-212.
22. Dobson F., Hinman R.S., Roos E.M., Abbott J.H., Stratford P., Davis A.M., et al. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2013, 21:1042-1052.
23. Reuben D.B., Magasi S., McCreath H.E., Bohannon R.W., Wang Y.-C., Bubela D.J., et al. Motor assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology 2013, 80(11 Suppl. 3):S65-S75.
24. Cumming R.G., Handelsman D., Seibel M.J., Creasey H., Sambrook P., Waite L., et al. Cohort profile: the concord health and ageing in men project (CHAMP). Int J Epidemiol 2009, 38(April (2)):374-378.
25. Grant J.F., Taylor A.W., Ruffin R.E., Wilson D.H., Phillips P.J., Adams R.J.T., et al. Cohort profile: The North West Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS). Int J Epidemiol 2009, 38(December (6)):1479-1486.
26. Smith W., Mitchell P., Attebo K., Leeder S. Selection bias from sampling frames: telephone directory and electoral roll compared with door-to-door population census: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust NZ J Publ Heal 1997, 21(2):127-133.
27. Australian Bureau of Statistics Socio-economic indexes for areas 2011, ABS, Canberra, 28.03.2013. Report No.: Contract No.: Cat. no. 2033.0.55.001.
28. Pannucci C.J., Wilkins E.G. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010, 126(2):619.
29. Tripepi G., Jager K.J., Dekker F.W., Zoccali C. Selection bias and information bias in clinical research. Nephron Clin Pract 2010, 115(2):c94-c99.
30. Delgado-Rodríguez M., Llorca J. Bias. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004, 58(8):635-641.
31. WHO Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organisation. International Health Conference 1948.
32. Rattan S.I. Healthy ageing, but what is health?. Biogerontology 2013, 14(6):673-677.
33. Li T., Hutfless S., Scharfstein D.O., Daniels M.J., Hogan J.W., Little R.J., et al. Standards should be applied in the prevention and handling of missing data for patient-centered outcomes research: a systematic review and expert consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 2014, 67(1):15-32.
34. Abecasis G., Altshuler D., Auton A., Brooks L., Durbin R., Gibbs R.A., et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 2010, 467(7319):1061-1073.