Slide navigation patterns among pathologists with long experience of digital review

Histopathology

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 185-192

  Molin, Jesper ^a,b,c   Fjeld, Morten ^a   Mello Thoms, Claudia ^d   Lundström, Claes ^b,c  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Teknikringen 2   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Classification of movement; Digital pathology; Multiscale navigation; Useability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIGITAL PATHOLOGY; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; IMAGING; MICROSCOPE; MICROSCOPE SLIDE; PATHOLOGIST; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THINKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEVICES; MICROSCOPY; PROCEDURES; TELEPATHOLOGY; WORKFLOW;

DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; TELEPATHOLOGY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84923535503     PISSN: 03090167     EISSN: 13652559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/his.12629     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Stathonikos N, Veta M, Huisman A, van Diest PJ. Going fully digital: perspective of a Dutch academic pathology lab. J. Pathol. Inform. 2013; 4; 15.
2. Evans AJ, Perez Ordonez B, Asa SL. Primary diagnosis by whole slide imaging (WSI) telepathology: University Health Network (UHN) goes live. Mod. Pathol. 2014; 27(Suppl 2s); 399A.
3. Pantanowitz L, Valenstein PN, Evans AJ, et al. Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology. J. Pathol. Inform. 2011; 2; 36.
4. Thorstenson S, Molin J, Lundström C. Implementation of largescale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in Sweden: digital pathology experiences 2006-2013. J. Pathol. Inform. 2014; 5; 14.
5. Onega T, Weaver D, Geller B, et al. Digitized whole slides for breast pathology interpretation: current practices and perceptions. J. Digit. Imaging 2014; 27; 642-648.
6. Crowley R, Naus G. Development of visual diagnostic expertise in pathology-an information-processing study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003; 10; 39-51.
7. Tiersma ESM, Peters AAW, Mooij HA, Fleuren GJ. Visualising scanning patterns of pathologists in the grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J. Clin. Pathol. 2003; 56; 677-680.
8. Krupinski EA, Graham AR, Weinstein RS. Characterizing the development of visual search expertise in pathology residents viewing whole slide images. Hum. Pathol. 2013; 44; 357-364.
9. Mello-Thoms C, Mello CAB, Medvedeva O, et al. Perceptual analysis of the reading of dermatopathology virtual slides by pathology residents. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2012; 136; 551-562.
10. Treanor D, Lim CH, Magee D, Bulpitt A, Quirke P. Tracking with virtual slides: a tool to study diagnostic error in histopathology. Histopathology 2009; 55; 37-45.
11. Treanor D, Jordan-Owers N, Hodrien J, Wood J, Quirke P, Ruddle RA. Virtual reality Powerwall versus conventional microscope for viewing pathology slides: an experimental comparison. Histopathology 2009; 55; 294-300.
12. Randell R, Ruddle RA, Thomas R, Treanor D. Diagnosis at the microscope: a workplace study of histopathology. Cogn. Technol. Work 2011; 14; 319-335.
13. Randell R, Ruddle RA, Mello-Thoms C, Thomas RG, Quirke P, Treanor D. Virtual reality microscope versus conventional microscope regarding time to diagnosis: an experimental study. Histopathology 2013; 62; 351-358.
14. Randell R, Ruddle RA, Thomas RG, Mello-Thoms C, Treanor D. Diagnosis of major cancer resection specimens with virtual slides: impact of a novel digital pathology workstation. Hum. Pathol. 2014; 45; 2101-2106.
15. Kirsh D, Maglio P. On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cogn. Sci. 1994; 18; 513-549.
16. Ruddle RA, Thomas RG, Randell RS, Quirke P, Treanor D. Performance and interaction behaviour during visual search on large, high-resolution displays. Inf. Vis. 2013; Doi: 10.1177/1473871613500978.
17. Drew T, Vo ML, Jacobson F, Seltzer SE, Wolfe JM. Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images. J. Vis. 2013; 13; 1-13.
18. Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Introduction and summary. In Ericsson KA, Simon HA eds. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data, revised edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993; 1-62.
19. McDonald S, Petrie H. The effect of global instructions on think-aloud testing. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2013; 2941-2944.
20. Furnas G, Bederson B. Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1995; 234-241.
21. Hornbæk K, Bederson B, Plaisant C. Navigation patterns and usability of zoomable user interfaces with and without an overview. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2002; 9; 362-389.
22. Pietriga E, Appert C, Beaudouin-Lafon M. Pointing and beyond: an operationalization and preliminary evaluation of multi-scale searching. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2007; 1215-1224.
23. Gutwin C, Skopik A. Fisheye views are good for large steering tasks. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2003; 201-208.
24. Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 1954; 47; 381-391.
25. Guiard Y, Beaudouin-Lafon M. Target acquisition in multiscale electronic worlds. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 2004; 61; 875-905.
26. Randell R, Ambepitiya T, Mello-Thoms C, et al. Effect of display resolution on time to diagnosis with virtual pathology slides in a systematic search task. J. Digit. Imaging 2014; 28; 68-76.
27. Jakobsen MR, Hornbæk K. Interactive visualizations on large and small displays: the interrelation of display size, information space, and scale. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2013; 19; 2336-2345.