Embodied and embedded: The dynamics of extracting perceptual visual invariants

Chaos and Complexity in Psychology: The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 177-205

  Renaud, Patrice ^a   Chartier, Sylvain ^b   Albert, Guillaume ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC EN OUTAOUAIS   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923491089     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139058544.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Aks, D. J., Zelinsky, G. J., & Sprott, J. C. (2002). Memory across eye-movements: 1/f dynamics in visual search. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 6, 1–25.
2. Bak, P., & Creutz, M. (1994). Fractals and self-organized criticality. In A. Bunde & S. Havlin (Eds.), Fractals in science(pp. 27–48). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3. Bak, P., Tang, C., & Wiesenfeld, K. (1987). Self-organized criticality: An explanation of 1/f noise. Physical Review Letters, 59, 381–384.
4. Bassingthwaighte, J. B., Liebovitch, L. S., & West, B. J. (1994). Fractal physiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Beer, R. D. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 173–215.
6. Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
7. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. P. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Clark, A. J. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Dillon, M. C. (1997). Merleau Ponty’s ontology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Duchowski, A. T., Medlin, E., Cournia, N., Murphy, H., Gramopadhye, A., Nair, S., et al. (2002). 3-D eye movement analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 573–591.
12. Ebenholtz, S. M. (2001). Oculomotor systems and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Eckmann, J.-P., Kamphorst, S. O., & Ruelle, D. (1987). Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. Europhysics Letters, 4, 973–977.
14. Freeman, W. J. (2001). Three centuries of category errors in studies of the neural basis of consciousness and intentionality. In W. Sulis & I. Trofimova (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in life and social sciences(pp. 275–285). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
15. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Gibson, J. J. (1961). Ecological optics. Vision Research, 1, 253–262.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Grassberger, P., & Procaccia, I. (1983). Characterization of strange attractors. Physical Review Letters, 50, 346–349.
20. Grassberger, P., Schreiber, T., & Schaffrath, C. (1991). Nonlinear time sequence analysis. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 1, 521–547.
21. Gregson, R. A. M., & Guastello, S. J. (2005). Introduction to nonlinear methodology, part 1: Challenges we face and those that we offer. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 9, 371–374.
22. Guastello, S. J. (2001). Nonlinear dynamics in psychology. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 6, 11–29.
23. Guastello, S. J. (2006). Motor control research requires nonlinear dynamics. American Psychologist, 61, 77–78.
24. Guastello, S. J., & Gregson, R. A. M. (2006). Introduction to nonlinear methodology, part 2: Domain-specific issues. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 10, 159–161.
25. Handel, S. (2006). Perceptual coherence: Hearing and seeing. England: Oxford University Press.
26. Hausdorff, J. M., Peng, C.-K., Ladin, Z., Wei, J. Y., & Goldberger, A. L. (1995). Is walking a random walk? Evidence for long-range correlations in the stride interval of human gait. Journal of Applied Physiology, 78, 349–358.
27. Hausdorff, J. M., Purdon, P., Peng, C.-K., Ladin, Z., Wei, J. Y., & Goldberger, A. L. (1996). Fractal dynamics of human gait: Stability of long-range correlations in stride interval fluctuations. Journal of Applied Physiology, 80, 1448–1457.
28. Heath, R. (2000). Nonlinear dynamics: Techniques and applications in psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Helmholtz, H. L. F. von (1925). A treatise on physiological optics(Vol. 3, J. P. C. Southall, Trans.). Menasha, WI: Optical Society of America. (Original work published 1867)
30. Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Kelso, J. A. S., & Zanone, P. G. (2002). Coordination dynamics and transfer across different effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance, 28, 776–797.
33. Kennel, M. B., Brown, R., & Abarbanel, H. D. I. (1992). Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Physical Review A, 45, 3403–3411.
34. Kim, N.-G., & Turvey, M. T. (1999). Eye movements and a rule for perceiving direction of heading. Ecological Psychology, 11, 233–248.
35. Kugler, P. N., & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Langer, M. S., & Mann, R. (2004). On the computation of image motion and heading in a 3-D cluttered scene. In L. M. Vaina, S. A. Beardsley, & S. K. Rushton (Eds.), Optical Flow and Beyond(pp. 289–304). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
37. Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Prazdny, K. (1980). The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 208, 385–397.
38. Mandelbrot, B. (1975). Les objets fractals [Fractal objects]. Paris: Flammarion.
39. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
40. McSharry, P. E. (2005). The danger of wishing for chaos. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 9, 375–397.
41. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception [The phenomenology of perception]. Paris: Gallimard.
42. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1946). Le primat de la perception et ses conséquences philosophiques [The primacy of perception and its philosophical consequences]. Lagrasse, France: Éditions Verdier.
43. Mitra, S., Riley, M. A., Schmidt, R. C., & Turvey, M. T. (1998). Vision and the level of synergies. In L. Harris & M. Jenkin (Eds.), Vision and action(pp. 314–331). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Newell, A. P., Rosenbloom, P. S., & Laird, J. E. (1989). Symbolic architectures for cognition. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science(pp. 93–131). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1011.
47. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Pellechia, G. L., & Shockley, K. (2005). Application of recurrence quantification analysis: Influence of cognitive activity on postural fluctuations. In M. A. Riley & G. C. Van Orden (Eds.), Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences(pp. 353–400). Retrieved May 30, 2007, from http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/chap3.pdf
49. Pressing, J. (1999). The referential dynamics of cognition and action. Psychological Review, 106, 714–747.
50. Renaud, P. (2006). Method for providing data to be used by a therapist for analyzing a patient behavior in a virtual environment. U.S. Patent No. 7128577. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
51. Renaud, P., Bouchard, S., & Proulx, R. (2002). Behavioral avoidance dynamics in the presence of a virtual spider. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedecine, 6, 235–243.
52. Renaud, P., Decarie, J., Gourd, S. P., Paquin, L. C., & Bouchard, S. (2003). Eye-tracking in immersive environments: A general methodology to analyze affordance-based interactions from oculomotor dynamics. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 6, 519–526.
53. Renaud, P., Singer, G., & Proulx, R. (2001). Head-tracking fractal dynamics in visually pursuing virtual objects. In W. Sulis & I. Trofimova (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in life and social sciences(pp. 333–346). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
54. Riley, M. A., Balasubramaniam, R., & Turvey, M. T. (1999). Recurrence quantification analysis of postural fluctuations. Gait & Posture, 9, 65–78.
55. Rock, I. (1997). Indirect perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Sasaki, O., Usami, S., Gagey, P. M., Martinerie, J., Le Van Quyen, M., & Arranz, P. (2002). Role of visual input in nonlinear postural control system. Experimental Brain Research, 147, 1–7.
57. Schöner, G., Dijkstra, T. M. H., & Jeka, J. J. (1998). Action-perception patterns emerge from coupling and adaptation. Ecological Psychology, 10, 323–346.
58. Schöner, G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1988). Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Science,239, 1513–1520.
59. Schreiber, T. (1993). Extremely simple nonlinear noise reduction method. Physical Review E, 47, 2401–2404.
60. Schreiber, T. (1999). Interdisciplinary application of nonlinear time series methods. Physics Reports, 308, 2–64.
61. Sedgwick, H. A. (2001). Visual space perception. In E. B. Goldstein (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of perception(pp. 128–167). Oxford: Blackwell.
62. Shaw, R. E. (2003). The agent-environment interface: Simon’s indirect or Gibson’s direct coupling? Ecological Psychology, 15, 37–106.
63. Shaw, R. E., & Turvey, M. T. (1999). Ecological foundations of cognition: II. Degrees of freedom and conserved quantities in animal–environment systems. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 111–123.
64. Shelhamer, M. (1998). Nonlinear dynamic systems evaluation of “rhythmic” eye movements (optokinetic nystagmus). Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 83, 45–56.
65. Shelhamer, M. (2005). Sequences of predictive eye movements form a fractional Brownian series – implications for self-organized criticality in the oculomotor system. Biological Cybernetics, 93, 43–53.
66. Skarda, C. A., & Freeman, W. J. (1987). How the brain makes chaos in order to make sense of the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 161–195.
67. Sprott, J. C. (2003). Chaos and time-series analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Sulis, W. (1995). Naturally occurring computational systems. In R. Robertson & A. Combs (Eds.), Chaos theory in psychology and the life sciences(pp. 103–121). New York: Erlbaum.
69. Swenson, R., & Turvey, M. T. (1991). Thermodynamic reasons for perception-action cycles. Ecological Psychology, 3, 317–348.
70. Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., & Farmer, J. D. (1992). Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 58, 77–94.
71. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Treffner, P. J., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1999). Dynamic encounters: Long memory during functional stabilization. Ecological Psychology, 11, 103–137.
73. Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2007). Intentionality in non-equilibrium systems? The functional aspects of self-organized pattern formation. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 1–15.
74. Turvey, M. T., & Shaw, R. E. (1995). Toward an ecological physics and a physical psychology. In R. L. Solso & D. W. Massaro (Eds.), The science of the mind: 2001 and beyond(pp. 143–169). New York: Oxford University Press.
75. Turvey, M. T., & Shaw, R. E. (1999). Ecological foundations of cognition: I. Symmetry and specificity of animal-environment systems. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 95–110.
76. Van Orden, G. C., & Holden, J. G. (2002). Intentional contents and self-control. Ecological Psychology, 14, 87–109.
77. Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 331–350.
78. Van Orden, G. C., Moreno, M. A., & Holden, J. G. (2003). A proper metaphysics for cognitive performance. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 7, 49–60.
79. Varela, F., Thompson, E. T., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Warren, W. H. (1995). Self-motion: Visual perception and visual control. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion(2nd ed., pp. 263–325). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
81. Warren, W. H. (2004). Optic flow. In L. Chalupa & J. Werner (Eds.), The visual neurosciences(pp. 1247–1259). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82. Warren, W. H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113, 358–389.
83. Warren, W. H., & Fajen, B. R. (2004). From optic flow to laws of control. In L. M. Vaina, S. A. Beardsley, & S. K. Rushton (Eds.), Optic flow and beyond(pp. 307–337). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.