India: The expectations and challenges of judicial enforcement of social rights

Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 102-124

  Muralidhar, S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923429544     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815485.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (12)

1. C. J. Dias, ‘The Impact of Social Activism and Movements for Legal Reform', in SaraHossain et al. (eds.), Public Interest Litigation in South Asia: Rights in Search of Remedies (Dhaka, TheUniversity Press Ltd., 1997), pp. 14.
2. G. Austin, The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966), pp. 77–83.
3. Mathew, J. in the Fundamental Rights Case,. para. 1707, p. 879.
4. V.R. Krishna. Iyer, J. in State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas (1976) 2 SCC 310, para. 134, p. 367.
5. Upendra Baxi, ‘Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Action Litigation in the Supreme Court of India', in Jagga Kapur (ed.), Supreme Court on Public Interest Litigation', Vol. 1 (New Delhi: LIPS Publications, 1998) p. A-91.
6. A. Desai and S. Muralidhar, ‘Public Interest Litigation: Potential and Problems' in B.N. Kirpal etal. (ed.), Supreme But Not Infallible: Essays in Honour of the Supreme Court of India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 159–192.
7. K. Rajendran v. State of Tamil Nadu (1982) 2 SCC 273, at p. 294
8. Almitra H. Patel v. Union of India (2000) 1 SCALE 568.
9. Almitra H. Patel v. Union of India (2000) 8 SCC 19.
10. Almitra H. Patel v. Union of India (2000) 2 SCC 166.
11. Almitra H. Patel v. Union of India (2000) 8 SCC 19.
12. Upendra Baxi and Thomas Paul (eds), Mass Disasters andMultinational Liability: The Bhopal Case (New Delhi: N.M. Tripathi, 1986), pp. 222–227.