Zen and the art of multiple comparisons

Psychosomatic Medicine

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 114-125

  Lindquist, Martin A ^a   Mejia, Amanda ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

effect size estimation; false detection rate; family wise error rate; functional magnetic resonance imaging; multiple comparisons

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BONFERRONI CORRECTION; BRAIN SIZE; CLUSTER EXTENT BASED THRESHOLDING; EFFECT SIZE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ERROR; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FAMILY WISE ERROR RATE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MULTIPLE COMPARISON; NEUROIMAGING; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PERMUTATION METHOD; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RANDOM FIELD THEORY; SAMPLE SIZE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNCORRECTED THRESHOLD; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84923409376     PISSN: 00333174     EISSN: 15347796     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000148     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, Munafo MR. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013;14:365-76.
2. Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005;2:e124.
3. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003;100:9440-45.
4. Nichols T, Hayasaka S. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Stat Methods Med Res 2003;12:419-46.
5. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002;15:870-78.
6. Wager T, Hernandez L, Jonides J, Lindquist M. Elements of functional neuroimaging. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson G, editors. Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007:19.
7. Lindquist MA. The statistical analysis of fMRI data. Stat Sci 2008;23:439-64.
8. Worsley KJ, Taylor JE, Tomaiuolo F, Lerch J. Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory. Neuroimage 2004; 23:S189-95.
9. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 1995:289-300.
10. Poline JB, Mazoyer BM. Analysis of individual positron emission tomography activation maps by detection of high signalto-noise-ratio pixel clusters. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993; 13:425-37.
11. Woo CW, Krishnan A, Wager TD. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations. Neuroimage 2014;91:412-19.
12. Wager TD, Lindquist M, Kaplan L. Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data: current and future directions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2007;2:150-58.
13. Lindquist MA, Gelman A. Correlations and multiple comparisons in functional imaging: a statistical perspective (commentary on Vul et al., 2009). Perspect Psychol Sci 2009;4:310-13.
14. Vul E, Harris C, Winkielman P, Pashler H. Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspect Psychol Sci 2009;4:274-90.
15. Kriegeskorte N, SimmonsWK, Bellgowan PS, Baker CI. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat Neurosci 2009;12:535-40.
16. Kriegeskorte N, Lindquist MA, Nichols TE, Poldrack RA, Vul E. Everything you never wanted to know about circular analysis, but were afraid to ask. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010;30:1551-57.
17. Lindquist MA, Spicer J, Asllani I, Wager TD. Estimating and testing variance components in a multi-level GLM. Neuroimage 2012;59:490-501.