Costs, benefits and interlinkages between adaptation and mitigation

Global Climate Governance beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 235-254

  Hof, Andries ^a   De Bruin, Kelly ^c   Dellink, Rob ^b   Den Elzen, Michel ^a   Van Vuuren, Detlef ^a  

^a PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923390300     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139107150.019     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Agrawala, S. and S. Fankhauser 2008. ‘Putting climate change adaptation in an economic context’, in S. Agrawala and S. Fankhauser (eds.), Economic Aspects of Adaptation to Climate Change: Costs, Benefits and Policy Instruments. Paris: OECD, pp. 19-28.
2. Agrawala, S., F. Crick, S. Jette-Nantel and A. Tepes 2008. ‘Empirical estimates of adaptation costs and benefits: a critical assessment’, in S. Agrawala and S. Fankhauser (eds.), Economic Aspects of Adaptation to Climate Change: Costs, Benefits and Policy Instruments. Paris: OECD, pp. 29-84.
3. Azar, C. 1998. ‘Are optimal CO2 emissions really optimal? Four critical issues for economists in the greenhouse’, Environmental and Resource Economics 11: 301-315.
4. Barrett, S. 1994. ‘Self-enforcing international environmental agreements’, Oxford Economic Papers 46: 878-894.
5. Commission of the European Communities 2007. Green Paper: Adapting to Climate Change in Europe - Options for EU Action. Brussels: Commission of the European.
6. de Bruin, K., R. Dellink and S. Agrawala 2009. Economic Aspects of Adaptation to Climate Change: Integrated Assessment Modelling of Adaptation Costs and Benefits. Paris: OECD.
7. den Elzen, M. G. J. and P. L. Lucas 2005. ‘The FAIR model: a tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of climate regimes’, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10: 115-134.
8. den Elzen, M. G. J. and D. P. van Vuuren 2007. ‘Peaking profiles: achieving long-term temperature targets with more likelihood at lower costs’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 17931-17936.
9. den Elzen, M. G. J., M. M. Berk, P. Lucas, P. Criqui and A. Kitous 2006. ‘Multi-stage: arule- based evolution of future commitments under the climate change convention’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 6: 1-28.
10. den Elzen, M. G. J., P. L. Lucas and D. P. van Vuuren 2008. ‘Regional abatement action and costs under allocation schemes for emission allowances for achieving low CO2- equivalent concentrations’, Climatic Change 90: 243-268.
11. den Elzen, M. G. J., M. Meinshausen and D. P. van Vuuren 2007. ‘Multi-gas emission envelopes to meet greenhouse gas concentration targets: costs versus certainty of limiting temperature increase’, Global Environmental Change 17: 260-280.
12. Dietz, S., C. Hope and N. Patmore 2007. ‘Some economics of “dangerous” climate change: reflections on the Stern Review’, Global Environmental Change 17: 311-325.
13. Finus, M., E. van Ierland and R. Dellink 2006. ‘Stability of climate coalitions in a cartel formation game’, Economics of Governance 7: 271-291.
14. Gupta, J. 1998. Encouraging Developing Country Participation in the Climate Change Regime. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit.
15. Hof, A. F., M. G. J. den Elzen and D. P. van Vuuren 2008. ‘Analysing the costs and benefits of climate policy: value judgements and scientific uncertainties’, Global Environmental Change 18: 412-424
16. Hope, C., J. Anderson and P. Wenman 1993. ‘Policy analysis of the greenhouse effect: an application of the PAGE model’, Energy Policy 21: 327-338.
17. IPCC 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. IPCC 2007a. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. IPCC 2007b. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Klein, R. J. T., E. Lisa, F. Schipper and S. Dessai 2005. ‘Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions’, Environmental Science and Policy 8: 579-588.
21. Meyer, A. 2000. Contraction and Convergence: The Global Solution to Climate Change, Schumacher Briefings No. 5. Dartington, UK: Green Books.
22. Miketa, A. 2004. Technical Description on the Growth Study Datasets. Environmentally Compatible Energy Strategies Program, Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/ECS/data_am/index.html.
23. Nakicenovic, N., J. Alcamo, G. Davis, B. de Vries, J. Fenhann, S. Gaffin, K. Gregory, Grubler, T. Y. Jung, T. Kram, E. Emilio la Rovere, L. Michaelis, S. Mori, T. Morita, W. Pepper, H. Pitcher, L. Price, K. Riahi, A. Roehrl, H. Rogner, A. Sankovski, M. Schlesinger, P. Shukla, S. Smith, R. Swart, S. van Rooyen, N. Victor and Z. Dadi 2000. IPCC Special Reports: Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Nordhaus, W. D. 1994. Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Nordhaus, W. D. 2008. A Question ofBalance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26. Nordhaus, W. D. and J. Boyer 2000. Warming the World: Economic Models ofGlobal Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Tol, R. S. J. 2002a. ‘Estimates of the damage costs of climate change: part I - benchmark estimates’, Environmental and Resource Economics 21: 47-73.
28. Tol, R. S. J. 2002b. ‘Estimates of the damage costs of climate change: part II - dynamic estimates’, Environmental and Resource Economics 21: 135-160.
29. Tol, R. S. J. 2005. ‘Adaptation and mitigation: trade-offs in substance and methods’, Environmental Science and Policy 8: 572-578.
30. United Kingdom Treasury 2003. The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: The Stationery Office.
31. UNFCCC 2007. Climate Change: Impacts, Vulnerabilities and Adaptation in Developing Countries. Bonn: UNFCCC.
32. van Vuuren, D. P. and B. O’Neill 2006. ‘The consistency of IPCC’s SRES scenarios to 1990-2000 trends and recent projection’, Climatic Change 27: 9-46.
33. van Vuuren, D. P., M. G. J. den Elzen, B. Eickhout, P. L. Lucas, B. J. Strengers and van Ruijven 2007. ‘Stabilising greenhouse gas concentrations. assessment of different strategies and costs using an integrated assessment framework’, Climatic Change 81: 119-159.
34. Weitzman, M. L. 2007. ‘A review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change’, Journal of Economic Literature 45: 703-724.
35. Wigley, T. M. L. 2003. MAGICC&/SCENGEN 4.1: Technical Manual. Boulder, CO: UCAR, Climate and Global Dynamics Division.
36. Wigley, T. M. L. and S. C. B. Raper 2001. ‘Interpretation of high projections for global- mean warming’, Science 293: 451-454.
37. Wigley, T. M. L. and S. C. B. Raper 2002. ‘Reasons for larger warming projections in the IPCC Third Assessment Report’, Journal of Climate 15: 2945-2952.
38. Wilbanks, T. J. 2005. ‘Issues in developing a capacity for integrated analysis of mitigation and adaptation’, Environmental Science and Policy 8: 541-547.
39. World Bank 2006. Clean Energy and Development: Towards an Investment Framework. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
40. World Bank 2008. World Development Indicators. http://go.worldbank.org/U0FSM7AQ40.