Proof of principle of a brain-computer interface approach to support poststroke arm rehabilitation in hospitalized patients: Design, acceptability, and usability

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2015, Pages S71-S78

  Morone, Giovanni ^a   Pisotta, Iolanda ^a   Pichiorri, Floriana ^a   Kleih, Sonja ^b   Paolucci, Stefano ^a   Molinari, Marco ^a   Cincotti, Febo ^a,c   Kübler, Andrea ^b   Mattia, Donatella ^a  

^a IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Brain computer interfaces; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGERY; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR IMAGERY; NATIONAL AERONAUTIC AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION TASK LOAD INDEX; PARESIS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; TREATMENT DURATION; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WARD; WORKLOAD; ARM; COMPLICATION; STROKE;

BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; PARESIS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84923360445     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.026     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. H.S. Jørgensen, H. Nakayama, H.O. Raaschou, J. Vive-Larsen, M. Støier, and T.S. Olsen Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76 1995 406 412
2. C.E. Lang, J.R. Macdonald, and D.S. Reisman Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90 2009 1692 1698
3. A.J. Bastian Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation Curr Opin Neurol 21 2008 628 633
4. G. Kwakkel, R.C. Wagenaar, J.W. Twisk, G.J. Lankhorst, and J.C. Koetsier Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial Lancet 354 1999 191 196
5. B.T. Volpe, D. Lynch, and A. Rykman-Berland Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22 2008 305 310
6. M. Iosa, G. Morone, and A. Fusco Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation Stroke Res Treat 2012 2012 187965
7. A.C. Lo, P.D. Guarino, and L.G. Richards Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke N Engl J Med 362 2010 1772 1783
8. M.C. Cirstea, and M.F. Levin Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors Neurorehabil Neural Repair 21 2007 398 411
9. S. Paolucci, A. Di Vita, and R. Massicci Impact of participation on rehabilitation results: a multivariate study Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 48 2012 455 466
10. J. Bernhardt, H. Dewey, A. Thrift, and G. Donnan Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care Stroke 35 2004 1005 1009
11. A. King, A. McCluskey, and K. Schurr The time use and activity levels of inpatients in a co-located acute and rehabilitation stroke unit: an observational study Top Stroke Rehabil 18 Suppl 1 2011 654 665
12. R.N. Barker, and S.G. Brauer Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors perspective Disabil Rehabil 27 2005 1213 1223
13. S. Silvoni, A. Ramos-Murguialday, and M. Cavinato Brain-computer interface in stroke: a review of progress Clin EEG Neurosci 42 2011 245 252
14. J.J. Daly, and J.R. Wolpaw Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation Lancet Neurol 7 2008 1032 1043
15. G. Prasad, P. Herman, D. Coyle, S. McDonough, and J. Crosbie Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study J Neuroeng Rehabil 7 2010 60
16. B. Várkuti, C. Guan, and Y. Pan Resting state changes in functional connectivity correlate with movement recovery for BCI and robot-assisted upper-extremity training after stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27 2013 53 62
17. A. Ramos-Murguialday, D. Broetz, and M. Rea Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study Ann Neurol 74 2013 100 108
18. A.H. Do, P.T. Wang, C.E. King, A. Abiri, and Z. Nenadic Brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation system for ankle movement J Neuroeng Rehabil 8 2011 49
19. ISO DIS 9241-210:2008. Ergonomics of human system interaction-part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). Switzerland: International Standardization Organization (ISO). Available at: www.iso.org. Accessed March 15, 2012.
20. A. Riccio, F. Leotta, and L. Bianchi Workload measurement in a communication application operated through a P300-based brain-computer interface J Neural Eng 8 2011 025028
21. C. Zickler, A. Riccio, and F. Leotta A brain-computer interface as input channel for a standard assistive technology software Clin EEG Neurosci 42 2011 236 244
22. C.D. Vargas, E. Olivier, L. Craighero, L. Fadiga, J.R. Duhamel, and A. Sirigu The influence of hand posture on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study Cereb Cortex 14 2004 1200 1206
23. S. de Vries, M. Tepper, B. Otten, and T. Mulder Recovery of motor imagery ability in stroke patients Rehabil Res Pract 2011 2011 283840
24. P. Cicinelli, B. Marconi, M. Zaccagnini, P. Pasqualetti, M.M. Filippi, and P.M. Rossini Imagery-induced cortical excitability changes in stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study Cereb Cortex 16 2006 247 253
25. N. Sharma, L.H. Simmons, and P.S. Jones Motor imagery after subcortical stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study Stroke 40 2009 1315 1324
26. L. Cattaneo, F. Caruana, A. Jezzini, and G. Rizzolatti Representation of goal and movements without overt motor behavior in the human motor cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study J Neurosci 29 2009 11134 11138
27. V. Kaiser, I. Daly, F. Pichiorri, D. Mattia, G.R. Müller-Putz, and C. Neuper Relationship between electrical brain responses to motor imagery and motor impairment in stroke Stroke 43 2012 2735 2740
28. R. Bohannon, and M. Smith Interrater reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity Phys Ther 67 1987 206
29. T.N. Tombaugh Test-retest reliable coefficients and 5-year change scores for the MMSE and 3MS Arch Clin Neuropsychol 20 2005 485 503
30. D.J. Gladstone, C.J. Danells, and S.E. Black The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16 2002 232 240
31. M. Sivan, R.J. O'Connor, S. Makower, M. Levesley, and B. Bhakta Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke J Rehabil Med 43 2011 181 189
32. L.B. Goldstein, C. Bertels, and J.N. Davis Interrater reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale Arch Neurol 46 1989 660 662
33. F.I. Mahoney, and D.W. Barthel Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index Md State Med J 14 1965 61 65
34. G. Pfurtscheller, and F.H. Lopes da Silva Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles Clin Neurophysiol 110 1999 1842 1857
35. C. Neuper, R. Scherer, M. Reiner, and G. Pfurtscheller Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25 2005 668 677
36. F. Pichiorri, and F. De Vico Fallani Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface training: the impact on motor cortical responsiveness J Neural Eng 8 2011 025020
37. J.W. Osselton Acquisition of EEG data by bipolar, unipolar and average reference methods: a theoretical comparison Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 19 1965 527 528
38. R. Cooper, C.D. Binnie, J.W. Osselton, P.F. Prior, and T. Wisman EEG, paediatric neurophysiology, special techniques and applications R. Cooper, F. Mauguiere, J.W. Osselton, P.F. Prior, B.M. Tedman, Clinical neurophysiology vol 2 2003 Elsevier Amsterdam 8 103
39. F. Cincotti, D. Mattia, and F. Aloise Non-invasive brain-computer interface system: towards its application as assistive technology Brain Res Bull 2008 796 803
40. F. Cincotti, D. Mattia, and F. Aloise High-resolution EEG techniques for brain-computer interface applications J Neurosci Methods 167 2008 31 42
41. M.E. Wewers, and N.K. Lowe A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena Res Nurs Health 13 1990 227 236
42. S.C. Kleih, F. Nijboer, S. Halder, and A. Kübler Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain-computer interface use Clin Neurophysiol 121 2010 1023 1031
43. E. Dozeman, D.J. van Schaik, H.W. van Marwijk, M.L. Stek, H.E. van der Horst, and A.T. Beekman The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is an adequate screening instrument for depressive and anxiety disorders in a very old population living in residential homes Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 26 2011 239 246
44. L. Bunketorp Käll, Å. Lundgren-Nilsson, C. Blomstrand, M. Pekna, M. Pekny, and M. Nilsson The effects of a rhythm and music-based therapy program and therapeutic riding in late recovery phase following stroke: a study protocol for a three-armed randomized controlled trial BMC Neurol 12 2012 141
45. F. Nijboer, N. Birbaumer, and A. Kübler The influence of psychological state and motivation on brain-computer interface performance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - a longitudinal study Front Neurosci 4 2010 55
46. NASA Human Performance Research Group NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) 1987 NASA Ames Research Center, NASA Human Performance Research Group Available at: http://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/TLX Accessed March 1, 2011
47. J. Kitzinger Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups BMJ 311 1995 299 302
48. L. Demers, R. Weiss-Lambrou, and B. Ska Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology. QUEST version 2.0. An outcome measure for assistive technology devices. Institute for Matching Person and Technology 2000 Webster New York
49. W.B. Rouse People and organizations: explorations of human-centered design 2007 Wiley Hoboken
50. R.J. Nudo Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage Curr Opin Neurobiol 16 2006 638 644
51. T.H. Murphy, and D. Corbett Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour Nat Rev Neurosci 10 2009 861 872
52. B.H. Dobkin, and A. Dorsch New evidence for therapies in stroke rehabilitation Curr Atheroscler Rep 15 2013 331
53. C.E. Lang, J.R. MacDonald, and C. Gnip Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke J Neurol Phys Ther 31 2007 3 10
54. F. De Vico Fallani, F. Pichiorri, and G. Morone Multiscale topological properties of functional brain networks during motor imagery after stroke Neuroimage 83C 2013 438 449
55. Bragoni M, Broccoli M, Iosa M, et al. Influence of psychological features on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with subacute stroke trained with robotic-aided walking therapy: a controlled longitudinal observational pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013;92(10 Suppl 2):e16-25.
56. J.M. Belda-Lois, S. Mena-del Horno, and I. Bermejo-Bosch Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach J Neuroeng Rehabil 8 2011 66
57. Kleih SC, Riccio A, Mattia D, et al. Motivation influences performance in SMR-BCI. Proceedings of the 5th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference; 2011 Sep 22-24; Graz (Austria). Graz (Austria): Graz University of Technology; 2011. p 108-111.