Predicting the risk of recurrent adenoma and incident colorectal cancer based on findings of the baseline colonoscopy

Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Fairley, Kimberly J ^a   Li, Jinhong ^a   Komar, Michael ^a   Steigerwalt, Nancy ^b   Erlich, Porat ^b  

^a GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTRIBUTABLE RISK; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER MORPHOLOGY; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RISK; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSPLASIA; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; RECURRENCE RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREND STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME; VILLOUS MORPHOLOGY;

EID: 84923358944     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2155384X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2014.11     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Doubeni CA, Weinmann S, Adams K et al. Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158: 312-320.
2. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-857.
3. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 1570-1595.
4. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696.
5. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 544-560.
6. Jacob BJ, Moineddin R, Sutradhar R et al. Effect of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: an instrumental variable analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 355-64.e1.
7. Winawer SJ St, John J, Bond J et al. Screening of average-risk individuals for colorectal cancer. WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Bull World Health Organ 1990; 68: 505-513.
8. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 1077-1085.
9. Arends MJ. Pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2013; 21: 97-102.
10. Goncalves AR, Ferreira C, Marques A et al. Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2011; 4: 277-281.
11. Lim G, Viney SK, Chapman BA et al. A prospective study of endoscopist-blinded colonoscopy withdrawal times and polyp detection rates in a tertiary hospital. N Z Med J 2012; 125: 52-59.
12. Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1315-1329; quiz 1314, 1330.
13. Fajobi O, Yiu CY, Sen-Gupta SB et al. Metachronous colorectal cancers. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 897-901.
14. van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA et al. Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 13-18.
15. Rossini FP, Arrigoni A, Pennanzio M. Treatment and follow-up of large bowel adenoma. Tumori 1995; 81: 38-44.
16. Morelli MS, Glowinski EA, Juluri R et al. Yield of the second surveillance colonoscopy based on the results of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 821-826.
17. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1872-1885.
18. Martinez ME, Sampliner R, Marshall JR et al. Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1077-1083.
19. Ladabaum U, Song K. Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1151-1162.
20. Lawson MJ, Tobi M. Cecal stampede: the headlong rush for screening colonoscopy: a position paper. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 871-874.
21. Vijan S, Inadomi J, Hayward RA et al. Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 507-515.
22. Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Mysliwiec P. Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices. Am J Med 2003; 115: 129-133.
23. Rex DK, Eid E. Considerations regarding the present and future roles of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer prevention. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 506-514.
24. Hinchcliff M, Just E, Podlusky S et al. Text data extraction for a prospective, researchfocused data mart: implementation and validation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12: 106 106-6947-12-106.
25. Bond JH. Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 3053-3063.
26. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-845.
27. Xu F, Town M, Balluz LS et al. Surveillance for certain health behaviors among states and selected local areas-United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ 2013; 62: 1-247.
28. Higgins AY, Doubeni AR, Phillips KL et al. Self-reported colorectal cancer screening of Medicare beneficiaries in family medicine vs. internal medicine practices in the United States: a cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol 2012; 12: 23-230X-12-23.
29. Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN et al. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 264-271.
30. Ko CW, Dominitz JA, Green P et al. Utilization and predictors of early repeat colonoscopy in Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2670-2679.
31. Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L et al. Why don't gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43: 554-558.
32. Wang YR, Cangemi JR, Loftus EV Jr et al. Rate of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in older patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 444-449.
33. Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut 2014; 63: 949-956.
34. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-1803.
35. Jover R, Herraiz M, Alarcon O et al. Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 444-451.
36. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Goodrich M et al. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1308-1312.
37. Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 832-841.
38. Simunic M, Perkovic N, Rosic-Despalatovic B et al. Colonoscopic polypectomies and recommendations on the colonoscopy follow-up intervals depending on endoscopic and histopathological findings. Acta Inform Med 2013; 21: 166-169.
39. Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 842-851.
40. Martinez ME, Thompson P, Messer K et al. One-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia: U.S. versus U.K. risk-stratification guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157: 856-864.
41. Randall JK, Good CS, Gilbert JM. 22-Year longitudinal study of repetitive colonoscopy in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013; 95: 586-590.
42. Kahi CJ, Anderson JC, Rex DK. Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer: state of the art. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 335-350.
43. Leddin D, Enns R, Hilsden R et al. Colorectal cancer surveillance after index colonoscopy: guidance from the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Can J Gastroenterol 2013; 27: 224-228.