The efficacy of computerized alcohol intervention tailored to drinking motives among college students: A quasi-experimental pilot study

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 183-187

  Canale, Natale ^a   Vieno, Alessio ^a   Santinello, Massimo ^a   Chieco, Francesca ^a   Andriolo, Stefano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Alcohol abuse; College students; Computer delivered intervention; Drinking motives; Prevention

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVENTION STUDY; MOTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; MALE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STUDENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ALCOHOL DRINKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PILOT PROJECTS; SOCIAL CONFORMITY; STUDENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923347526     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: 10979891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2014.991022     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fromme K, Corbin WR, Kruse MI. Behavioral risks during the transition from high school to college. Dev Psychol 2008;44: 1497-1504.
2. Hingson RW, Zha W, Weitzman ER. Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among US college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2009;16:12-20.
3. Cunningham JA. Comparison of two internet-based interventions for problem drinkers: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e107.
4. Barak A, Hen L, Boniel-Nissim M, Shapira NA. A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. J Technol Hum Serv 2008;26: 109-160.
5. Hester RK, Delaney HD, Campbell W. The College Drinker's Check-Up: outcomes of two randomized clinical trials of a computer-delivered intervention. Psychol Addict Behav 2012;26: 1-12.
6. Palfai TP, Zisserson R, Saitz R. Using personalized feedback to reduce alcohol use among hazardous drinking college students: the moderating effect of alcohol-related negative consequences. Addict Behav 2011;36:539-542.
7. Miller MB, Leffingwell T, Claborn K, Meier E, Walters S, Neighbors C. Personalized feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: an update of Walters & Neighbors (2005). Psychol Addict Behav 2013;27:909-920.
8. Adams ZW, Kaiser AJ, Lynam DR, Charnigo RJ, Milich R. Drinking motives as mediators of the impulsivity-substance use relation: pathways for negative urgency, lack of premeditation, and sensation seeking. Addict Behav 2012;37:848-855.
9. Kuntsche E, Gabhainn SN, Roberts C, Windlin B, Vieno A, Bendtsen P, Wicki M. Drinking motives and links to alcohol use in 13 European countries. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2014;75:428-437.
10. Cooper ML. Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychol Assessment 1994;6:117-128.
11. Conrod PJ, Castellanos-Ryan N, Mackie C. Long-term effects of a personality-targeted intervention to reduce alcohol use in adolescents. J Consult Clin Psych 2011;79:296-306.
12. Patrick ME, Lee CM, Larimer ME. Drinking motives, protective behavioral strategies, and experienced consequences: identifying students at risk. Addict Behav 2011;36:270-273.
13. Disperati F, Canale N, Vieno A, Marino C, Chieco F, Andriolo S, Santinello M. "Scopri che bevitore sei": intervento di prevenzione online per ridurre il consumo di alcol e i problemi alcol relati ["Which type of drinker are you?": an online prevention programme to reduce alcohol consumption and alcohol related problems]. Ital J Psychol (in press).
14. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, Grant M. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction 1993;88:791-804.
15. Mazzardis S, Vieno A, Kuntsche E, Santinello M. Italian validation of the drinking motives questionnaire revised short form (DMQ-R SF). Addict Behav 2010;35:905-908.
16. Elliott JC, Carey KB, Bolles JR. Computer-based interventions for college drinking: a qualitative review. Addict Behav 2008;33: 994-1005.
17. Miller WR. Enhancing motivation for change in substance abuse treatment. Vol. 35. Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1999.
18. Collins SE, Kirouac M, Lewis MA, Witkiewitz K, Carey KB. Randomized controlled trial of web-based decisional balance feedback and personalized normative feedback for college drinkers. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2014;75:982-992.
19. Chung T, Colby SM, Barnett NP, Rohsenow DJ, Spirito A, Monti PM. Screening adolescents for problem drinking: performance of brief screens against DSM-IV alcohol diagnoses. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2000;61:579-587.
20. Kelly TM, Donovan JE, Kinnane JM, Taylor DM. A comparison of alcohol screening instruments among under-aged drinkers treated in emergency departments. Alcohol Alcsm 2002;37:444-450.