Development and implementation results of an interactive computerized surgical checklist for robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery

Journal of Robotic Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 11-18

  McCarroll, Michele L ^a   Zullo, Melissa D ^b   Dante Roulette, G ^a   Mendise, Thomas M ^a   Ferris, Edward ^a   Zolton, Jessica ^a   Andrews, Stephen J ^a   von Gruenigen, Vivian E ^a  

^a SUMMA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Checklist; Robotic assisted hysterectomy; Safe surgery; Safety culture

Indexed keywords

% REDUCTIONS; CHECKLIST; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERIES; HIGH VOLUMES; MINIMALLY INVASIVE; ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERIES; ROBOTIC-ASSISTED HYSTERECTOMY; SAFE SURGERY; SAFETY CULTURE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

ADULT; CHECKLIST; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SAFETY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; CHECKLIST; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SAFETY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84923338297     PISSN: 18632483     EISSN: 18632491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-014-0482-z     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) Estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372(9633):139–144
2. Tanner L (2013) Associated Press FDA takes fresh look at robotic surgery—the high-tech helper da Vinci is under scrutiny after reports of problems. 2:27 p.m. EDT April 9, 2013. Retrieved February 2, 2014. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/09/robot-surgery-fda/2067629/
3. PR Newsire Surgical robots market shares, strategies, trends and forecasts, worldwide, 2013–2019: New Market Research Report on Market Research Reports.Biz. Retrieved February 1, 2014. http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/surgical-robots-market-shares-strategies-trends-and-forecasts-worldwide-2013-to-2019-new-market-research-report-on-marketresearchreportsbiz-226880051.html
4. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5):491–499. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0810119
5. The World Health Organization. implementation manual. WHO surgical safety checklist 2009. Safe surgery saves lives. ISBN 978 92 4 159859 0
6. Angle JF, Nemcek AA Jr, Cohen AM, Miller DL, Grassi CJ, D’Agostino HR, Khan AA, Kundu S, Osnis RB, Rajan DK, Schwartzberg MS, Swan TL, Vedantham S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF (2009) SIR standards division quality improvement guidelines for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong person errors of the joint commission “universal protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong person surgery” to the practice of interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20(7 Suppl):S256–S262
7. Kirkpatrick DH, Burkman RT (2010) Does standardization of care through clinical guidelines improve outcomes and reduce medical liability? Obstet Gynecol 116:1022–1026
8. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Readmissions Reduction Program. Retrieved February 14, 2014. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Readmissions-Reduction-Program.html
9. Medicare.gov Hospital Compare. The Official US Government Site for Medicare. 30-day death and readmission measures. Retrieved February 17, 2014. http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/Data/30-day-measures.html?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
10. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved December 19, 2013. http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/products/products_faq.html
11. Wynd CA, Schmidt B, Schaefer MA (2003) Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res 25:508–518
12. Devon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P et al (2007) A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh 39(2):155–164
13. Katz, Mitchell H (2006) Multivariable analysis: a practical guide for clinicians, Cambridge University Press. ISBN-13 978-0521-84051-4
14. Fudickar A, Horle K, Wiltfang J, Bein B (2012) The effect of the WHO surgical safety checklist on complication rate and communication. Dtsch Arztebl Int 109:695–701
15. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). http://www.acog.org/Resources%20And%20Publications/Committee%20Opinions/Committee%20on%20Patient%20Safety%20and%20Quality%20Improvement/Standardization%20of%20Practice%20to%20Improve%20Outcomes.aspx Retrieved on 8 October, 2013
16. Mehtsun WT, Ibrahim AM, Diener-West M, Pronovost PJ, Makary MA (2013) Surgical never events in the United States. Surgery 153:364–472
17. Pizzi L, Goldbarb N, Nash D (2001) Crew resource management and its applications in medicine. In: agency for healthcare research and quality. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 43. Rockville (MD): AHRQ; p. 505–13
18. Zullo MD, McCarroll ML, Mendise TM, Ferris FE, Roulette GD, Zolton J, Andrews SJ, von Gruenigen VE (2014) Safety culture in the gynecology robotics operating room. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.027
19. Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT, Bonacum D, Brookey J, Graham S, Lasky RE, Sexton JB (2009) Thomas Ej. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 197(5):678–685
20. Sexton B, Makary MA, Tersigni AR (2006) Teamwork in the operating room. frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel. Anesthesiology 105:877–884