The pursuit of DLPFC: Non-neuronavigated methods to target the left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex with symmetric bicephalic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Brain Stimulation

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 590-602

  Seibt, Ole ^a,c   Brunoni, Andre R ^b   Huang, Yu ^c   Bikson, Marom ^c  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c City University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

Finite element method; Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CORPUS CALLOSUM; CURRENT DENSITY; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRODE; ELECTRODE POSITIONING SYSTEM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FACILITATION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; LATERAL BRAIN VENTRICLE; MALE; NEUROLOGICAL THERAPEUTIC DEVICE; NEURONAVIGATION; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP; TEMPORAL BONE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; WHITE MATTER; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; HEAD; PHYSIOLOGY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; ELECTRODES; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMANS; MALE; NEURONAVIGATION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

EID: 84923314398     PISSN: 1935861X     EISSN: 18764754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.401     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Reato D, Rahman A, Bikson M, Parra LC. Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing. J Neurosci 2010;30(45):15067e79.
2. Bikson M, Inoue M, Akiyama H, et al. Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. J Physiol 2004;557(1):175e90.
3. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 2000;527(3):633e9.
4. Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 2011;5(3):175e95.
5. Kuo MF, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Boosting focally-induced brain plasticity by dopamine. Cereb Cortex 2010;18(3):18648e51.
6. Rusjan PM, Barr MS, Farzan F, et al. Optimal transcranial magnetic stimulation coil placement for targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex using novel magnetic resonance image-guided neuronavigation. Hum Brain Mapp 2010;31(11):1643e52.
7. Beam W, Borckhardt J, Reeves S, George M. An efficient and accurate new method for locating the F3 position from prefrontal TMS applications. Brain Stimul 2009;2.
8. Klem GH, Lueders HO, Jasper HH, Elger C. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1999;52.
9. Mylius V, Ayache SS, Ahdab R, et al. Definition of DLPFC and M1 according to anatomical landmarks for navigated brain stimulation: Inter-rater reliability, accuracy, and influence of gender and age. Neuroimage 2013;78:224e32.
10. Nitsche MA, Doemkes S, Karaköse, et al. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 2007;97(4):3109e17.
11. Datta A, Truong DQ, Mihnas P, Parra L, Bikson M. Inter-individual variation during transcranial direct current stimulation and normalization of dose using MRI-derived computational models. Front Psychiatry 2012;3.
12. Edwards D, Cortes M, Datta A, Parra L, Minhas P. Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS. Neuroimage 2013;74:266e75.
13. Villamar MF, Wivatvongvana P, Patumanond J, et al. Focal modulation of the primary motor cortex in fibromyalgia using 41-Ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS): immediate and delayed analgesic effects of cathodal and anodal stimulation. J Pain 2013;14(4):371e83.
14. Datta A, Bansal V, Diaz J, Patel J, Reato D, Bikson M. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation; improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul 2009;2(4):201e7.
15. Grabner G, Janke AL, Budge MM, Smith D, Pruessner J, Collins DL. Symmetric atlasing and model based segmentation: an application to the hippocampus in older adults. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2006;9:58e66.
16. Hunag Y, Domchowski JP, Su Y, et al. Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head. J Neural Eng 2013;10(6).
17. Al-Hakim R, Fallon J, Nain D, et al. A dorsolateral prefrontal cortex semiautomatic segmenter. Med Imaging 2006 Image Process 2006;10(1).
18. Wagner T, Fregni F, Fecteau S, Grodzinisky A, Zahn M, Pascual-Leone A. "Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study. Neuroimage 2007;35(3):1113e24.
19. Bikson M, Dmochowski J, Rahman A. The "quasi-uniform" assumption in animal and computational models of non-invasive electrical stimulation. Brain Stimul 2013;6(4):704e5.
20. Dmochowski JP, Datta A, Bikson M, Su Y, Parra LC. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. J Neural Eng 2011;8(4).
21. Peterchev AV, Wagner TA, Miranda PC, et al. Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnatic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices. Brain Stimul 2012;5(4):435e53.
22. Dmochowski JP, Datta A, Huang Y, et al. Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke. Neuroimage 2013;75(1):12e9.
23. Cieslik EC, Zilles K, Caspers S, et al. Is there "One" DLPFC in cognitive action control? evidence for heterogeneity from co-activation-based parcellation. Cereb Cortex 2013;256.