The Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics: A Foundation for Current Bioethical Debate

Journal of Chiropractic Humanities

Volumn 14, Issue , 2007, Pages 34-40

  Lawrence, Dana J ^a  

^a Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomedical Ethics; Chiropractic

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENEFICENCE; BIOETHICS; CHIROPRACTIC; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; JUSTICE; MORALITY; NONMALEFICENCE; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84923227647     PISSN: 15563499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1556-3499(13)60161-8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. th ed., 2001, Oxford University Press, New York City, NY.
2. nd edition, 1996, Oxford University Press, New York City, NY.
3. Johnson, AR, On the origins and future of the Belmont Report. Childress, JF, Meslin, EM, Shapiro, HT, (eds.) Belmont revisited: ethical principles for research with human subjects, 2005, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.
4. Feinberg, J, Harm to self. The moral limits of criminal law, 1986, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
5. Thomasma, DC, A philosophy of a clinically-based medical ethics. J Med Ethics 6 (1980), 190–196.
6. Gillon, R, Philosophical medical ethics, 1986, Wiley, Chichester - derived from a 26-part series in Br Med J from 1985;290:1117 to 1986;292:543–545.
7. Gillon, R, Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. Br Med J, 309, 1994, 184 Available from: www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/309/6948/184.
8. Harris, J, In praise of unprincipled ethics. J Med Ethics 29 (2003), 303–306.
9. Campbell, AV, The virtues and vices of the four principles. J Med Ethics 29 (2003), 292–296.
10. McCarthy, J, Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them. Med Humanit 29 (2003), 65–71.
11. Gillon, R, Four scenarios. J Med Ethics 29 (2003), 267–268.
12. Beauchamp, TL, Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics 29 (2003), 269–274.
13. Rawls, J, A theory of justice, 1971, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
14. Macklin, R, Applying the four principles. J Med Ethics 29 (2003), 275–280.
15. Dawson, A, Garrard, E, In defence of moral imperialism: four equal and universal prima facie principles. J Med Ethics 32 (2006), 200–204.
16. Holm, S, Not just autonomy- the principles of American biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics 21 (1995), 323–324.
17. Lustig, BA, The method of “principlism”: a critique of the critique. J Med Philos 17 (1992), 487–510.
18. Beauchamp, TL, Principlism and its alleged competitors. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 5 (1995), 181–198.
19. Clouser, KD, Gert, B, A critique of principlism. J Med Philos 15 (1990), 219–236.
20. Gert, B, Culver, CM, Clouser, KD, Bioethics: a systematic approach, 2006, Oxford University Press, New York City, NY.
21. Gillon, R, Ethics needs principles- four can encompass the rest- and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals.”. J Med Ethics 29 (2003), 307–312.