Reciprocal transitive matrices over abelian linearly ordered groups: Characterizations and application to multi-criteria decision problems

Fuzzy Sets and Systems

Volumn 266, Issue , 2015, Pages 33-46

  Cavallo, Bice ^a   D'Apuzzo, Livia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Abelian linearly ordered group; Multiple criteria evaluation; Ordinal evaluation vector; Pairwise comparison matrix; transitivity

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; VECTORS;

ABELIAN LINEARLY ORDERED GROUPS; EVALUATION VECTORS; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION PROBLEMS; MULTIPLE-CRITERIA EVALUATION; PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRICES; PREFERENCE INTENSITIES; TRANSITIVE MATRIX;

GROUP THEORY;

EID: 84923216066     PISSN: 01650114     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2014.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J. Barzilai Consistency measures for pairwise comparison matrices J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 7 3 1998 123 132
2. L. Basile, and L. D'Apuzzo Ranking and weak consistency in the A.H.P. context Decis. Econ. Finance 20 1 1997 99 109
3. L. Basile, and L. D'Apuzzo Weak consistency and quasi-linear means imply the actual ranking Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 10 3 2002 227 239
4. S. Bortot, and R.A. Marquez Pereira Inconsistency and non-additive capacities: the analytic hierarchy process in the framework of Choquet integration Fuzzy Sets Syst. 213 2013 6 26
5. M. Brunelli, and M. Fedrizzi Axiomatic properties of inconsistency indices J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.135, published online 04 December 2013
6. B. Cavallo, and L. D'Apuzzo A general unified framework for pairwise comparison matrices in multicriterial methods Int. J. Intell. Syst. 24 4 2009 377 398
7. B. Cavallo, and L. D'Apuzzo Characterizations of consistent pairwise comparison matrices over abelian linearly ordered groups Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25 10 2010 1035 1059
8. B. Cavallo, and L. D'Apuzzo Deriving weights from a pairwise comparison matrix over an alo-group Soft Comput. 16 2 2012 353 366
9. B. Cavallo, L. D'Apuzzo, Investigating properties of the ⊙-consistency index, in: S. Greco, B. Bouchon-Meunier, G. Coletti, M. Fedrizzi, B.Matarazzo, R. Yager (Eds.), Advances in Computational Intelligence, in: Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 300, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 315-327.
10. B. Cavallo, L. D'Apuzzo, and M. Squillante About a consistency index for pairwise comparison matrices over a divisible alo-group Int. J. Intell. Syst. 27 2 2012 153 175
11. F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, and E. Herrera-Viedma Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations Fuzzy Sets Syst. 97 1 1998 33 48
12. F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma, S. Alonso, and F. Herrera Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17 1 2009 14 23
13. J. Fodor, R. Yager, and A. Rybalov Structure of uninorms Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 5 4 1997 411 427
14. E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, F. Chiclana, and M. Luque Some issue on consistency of fuzzy preferences relations Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154 2004 98 109
15. B. Llamazares, P. Pérez-Asurmendi, and J.L. García-Lapresta Collective transitivity in majorities based on difference in support Fuzzy Sets Syst. 216 2013 3 15
16. J. Peláez, and M. Lamata A new measure of consistency for positive reciprocal matrices Comput. Math. Appl. 46 12 2003 1839 1845
17. F.S. Roberts Measurement Theory with Applications to Decisionmaking, Utility, and the Social Sciences vol. 7 1979 Addison-Wesley London
18. T.L. Saaty A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures J. Math. Psychol. 15 1977 234 281
19. T.L. Saaty The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980 McGraw-Hill New York
20. T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making Fuzzy Sets Syst. 12 2 1984 117 131
21. T. Tanino Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision-Making 1988 Springer Heidelberg 54 71