Two-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 21, 2014, Pages E1284-E1290

  Hao, Dingjun ^a   Wang, Wentao ^a   Duan, Kun ^b   Ma, Minjie ^a   Jiang, Yong ^a   Liu, Tuanjiang ^a   He, Baorong ^a  

^a MEDICAL SCHOOL OF XI AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHINA NATIONAL NUCLEAR CORPORATION   (China)

Author keywords

blood loss; circumferential decompression; combined posteroanterior fusion; controlled clinical trial; interbody fusion; neural recovery; operation time; surgeryrelated complications; thoracolumbar fracture dislocation; transforaminal thoracic lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMERICAN SPINAL INJURY ASSOCIATION IMPAIRMENT SCALE; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DONOR SITE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LIQUORRHEA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PLEURA EFFUSION; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTERIOR SPINE FUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STANDING; THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURE DISLOCATION; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; TRANSFORAMINAL THORACIC INTERBODY FUSION; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRA DISLOCATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BIOMECHANICS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHINA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; DISLOCATIONS; INJURIES; KYPHOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT POSITIONING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; SPINAL FRACTURES; SPINE FUSION; TIME; VERTEBRA;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHINA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISLOCATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PATIENT POSITIONING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK FACTORS; SPINAL FRACTURES; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84923207778     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000529     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Pasapula C, Wilson-MacDonald J. Mini-symposium: spinal trauma (ii) thoracolumbar fractures. Curr Orthop 2004; 18: 17-25
2. Zhang ZF, Zhou Y, Wang HG, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for type C thoracolumbar complete rotational fracture and dislocation. J Spinal Surg 2013; 11: 264-8
3. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Ito K, et al. A new thoracic reconstruction technique "transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion": a preliminary report of clinical outcomes. Spine 2010; 35: E1000-5
4. Dai LY, Jiang SD, Wang XY, et al. A review of the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol 2007; 67: 221-31
5. Danisa OA, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA, et al. Surgical approaches for the correction of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes. J Neurosurg 1995; 83: 977-83
6. Razak M, Mahmud M, Mokhtar SA, et al. Thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation results of surgical treatment. Med J Malaysia 2000; 55: 14-7
7. Sasagawa T, Kawahara N, Murakami H, et al. Decompression, correction, and interbody fusion for lumbar burst fractures using a single posterior approach. Orthopedics 2009; 32
8. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, et al. A comprehensive classifi cation of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 1994; 3: 184-201
9. American Spinal Injury Association. Standard for Neurologic and Functional Class of Spinal Cord Injury. Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association; 1992
10. Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA, Jr, Hurlbert RJ, et al. A new classifi cation of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine 2005; 30: 2325-33
11. Schmid R, Lindtner RA, Lill M, et al. Combined posteroanterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Injury 2012; 43: 475-9
12. Weidenbaux M, Farcy JPC. Surgical management of thoracic and lumbar burst fractures. In: Bridwell KH, Dewald RL, eds. The Text Book of Spinal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1997: 1839-80
13. Tezeren G, Kuru I. Posterior fi xation of thoracolumbar burst fracture: short-segment pedicle fi xation versus long-segment instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18: 485-8
14. Fredrickson BE, Edwards WT, Rauschning W, et al. Vertebral burst fractures: an experimental, morphologic, and radiographic study. Spine 1992; 17: 1012-21
15. Dimar JR II, Wilde PH, Glassman SD, et al. Thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with combined anterior and posterior surgery. Am J Orthop 1996; 25: 159-65
16. Sasso RC, Renkens K, Hanson D, et al. Unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures anterior-only versus short-segment posterior fi xation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19: 242-8
17. Ruan DK, Wu FX, Shen GB. Neurologic outcome following indirect spinal canal decompression in patients with thoracolumbar fractures and partial neurologic defi cit. Orthop J Chin 1999; 10: 729-31
18. Xia Q, Xu B, Zhang J, et al. The choice and evaluation of anterior, posterior, or combined surgery for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Chin J Orthop 2004; 12: 719-21
19. Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three-to fi veyear results. Eur Spine J 2005; 14: 551-8
20. Reinhold M, Knop C, Beisse R, et al. Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries: comprehensive results from the second, prospective, Internet-based multicenter study of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 1657-76.