Quantitation of zygomatic complex symmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 72, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 2053.e1-2053.e8

  Gong, Xi ^a   He, Ying ^a   He, Yang ^a   An, Jin Gang ^a   Yang, Yao ^a   Zhang, Yi ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TEMPORAL BONE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ZYGOMATIC COMPLEX;

EID: 84923192552     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: 15315053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.06.447     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Meyer-Marcotty P, Alpers GW, Gerdes AB, et al: Impact of facial asymmetry in visual perception: A 3-dimensional data analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:168, 2010
2. Covington DS, Wainwright DJ, Teichgraeber JF, et al: Changing patterns in the epidemiology and treatment of zygoma fractures: 10-Year review. J Trauma 37:243, 1994
3. Czerwinski M, Martin M, Lee C: Quantitative topographical evaluation of the orbitozygomatic complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 115: 1858, 2005
4. Moubayed SP, Duong F, Ahmarani C, et al: A novel technique for malar eminence evaluation using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Arch Facial Plast Surg 14:403, 2012
5. Nechala P, Mahoney J, Farkas LG: Maxillozygional anthropometric landmark: A new morphometric orientation point in the upper face. Ann Plast Surg 41:402, 1998
6. Furst IM, Austin P, Pharoah M, et al: The use of computed tomography to define zygomatic complex position. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:647, 2001
7. He Y, Zhang Y, An JG, et al: Zygomatic surface marker-assisted surgical navigation: A new computer-assisted navigation method for accurate treatment of delayed zygomatic fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:2101, 2013
8. de Moraes ME, Hollender LG, Chen CS, et al: Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and conebeam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:e523, 2011
9. Pham AM, Rafii AA, Metzger MC, et al: Computer modeling and intraoperative navigation in maxillofacial surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:624, 2007
10. Holmes S, Goldner S, Bridle C, et al: Evaluation of complex craniomaxillofacial fractures by a new three-dimensional planning system. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:416, 2006
11. Saini P: Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma (ed 4). St Louis, MO, Saunders, 2013. p 358
12. Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD, et al: A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:600, 2006
13. Muramatsu A, Nawa H, Kimura M, et al: Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method. Angle Orthod 78:396, 2008
14. Damstra J, Fourie Z, De Wit M, et al: A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry. Clin Oral Investig 16:285, 2012
15. Farkas LG, Cheung G: Facial asymmetry in healthy North American Caucasians: An anthropometrical study. Angle Orthod 51: 70, 1981
16. Ellis E III, KittidumkerngW: Analysis of treatment for isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54: 386, 1996
17. Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159, 1977
18. Greiner G, Niemann H, Ertl T, et al: Vision, Modeling, and Visualization. Amsterdam, IOS, 2002. p 332
19. Hartmann J, Meyer-Marcotty P, Benz M, et al: Reliability of a method for computing facial symmetry plane and degree of asymmetry based on 3D-data. J Orofac Orthop 68:477, 2007