An investigation of mixed-media information retrieval

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2458, Issue , 2002, Pages 463-478

  Jones, Gareth J F ^a   Lam Adesina, Adenike M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

DIGITAL DOCUMENTS; DOCUMENT COLLECTION; DOCUMENT IMAGES; MIXED MEDIAS; PSEUDO RELEVANCE FEEDBACK; SCANNED IMAGES; SPOKEN DOCUMENT;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84923176436     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45747-x_34     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. P. B. Kantor and E. M. Voorhees. The TREC-5 Confusion Track: Comparing RetrievalMetho ds for Scanned Text. Information Retrieval, 2:165–176, 2000.
2. J. S. Garafolo, C. G. P. Auzanne, and E. M. Voorhees. The TREC Spoken Document RetrievalTrac k: A Success Story. In Proceedings of the RIAO 2000 Conference: Content-Based Multimedia Information Access, pages 1–20, Paris, 2000.
3. M. Wechsler, E. Munteanu, and P. Schauble. New Techniques for Open-Vocabulary Spoken Document Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 20–27, Melbourne, 1998. ACM.
4. G. J. F. Jones, J. T. Foote, K. Sparck Jones, and S. J. Young. Retrieving spoken documents by combining multiple index sources. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 30–38, Zurich, 1996. ACM.
5. M. Sanderson and F. Crestani. Mixing and merging for spoken document retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 397–407, Heraklion, Greece, 1998. Springer Verlag.
6. K. Taghva, J. Borsack, and A. Condit. Evaluation of Model-Based Retrieval Effectiveness with OCR Text. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(1):64–93, 1996.
7. E. Mittendorf and P. Schauble. Information Retrieval can Cope with Many Errors. Information Retrieval, 3:189–216, 2000.
8. S. E. Johnson, P. Jourlin, K. Spark Jones, and P.C. Woodland. Spoken Document Retrievalfor TREC-8 at Cambridge University. In D. K. Harman and E. M. Voorhees, editors, Proceedings of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-7), pages 157–168, Gaithersburg, MD, 2000. NIST.
9. C. Auzanne, J. S. Garafolo, J. G. Fiscus, and W. M. Fisher. Automatic Language ModelAdaptation for Spoken Document Retrieval. In Proceedings of the RIAO 2000 Conference: Content-Based Multimedia Information Access, pages 1–20, Paris, 2000.
10. G.J.F. Jones and M. Han. Information Retrieval from Mixed-Media Collections: Report on Design and Indexing of a Scanned Document Collection. Technical Report 400, Department of Computer Science, University of Exeter, January 2001.
11. S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TREC-3. In D. K. Harman, editor, Overview of the Third Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-3), pages 109–126. NIST, 1995.
12. M. F. Porter. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14:130–137, 1980.
13. G. J. F. Jones and M. Han. Retrieving scanned documents from a mixed-media document collection. In Proceedings of the BCS-IRSG European Colloquium on IR Research, pages 136–149, Darmstadt, April 2001.
14. S. E. Robertson. On term selection for query expansion. Journal of Documentation, 46:359–364, 1990.
15. A. M. Lam-Adesina and G. J. F. Jones. Applying Summarization Techniques for Term Selection in Relevance Feedback. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1–9, New Orleans, 2001. ACM.