Use of multispectral imaging in varietal identification of tomato

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 4496-4512

  Shrestha, Santosh ^a   Deleuran, Lise Christina ^a   Olesen, Merete Halkjær ^a   Gislum, René ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Multispectral imaging; Non destructive; Seed; Tomato; Varietal discrimination; Varietal identification

Indexed keywords

DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FRUITS; IMAGE PROCESSING; SEED;

CANONICAL DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; CLASSIFICATION ERRORS; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGING; NON DESTRUCTIVE; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE (PLS); TOMATO; VARIETAL DISCRIMINATION;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84923102455     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s150204496     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. FAOSTAT. Available online: http://faostat.fao.org/(accessed on 8 December 2014).
2. Cooke, R. Introduction: The reasons for variety identification. Identification of Food Grain Varieties; AACC: Saint Paul, MN, USA, 1995; pp. 1-18.
3. Cooke, R. New approaches to potato variety identification. Potato Res. 1999, 42, 529-539.
4. Tanksley, S.D. Molecular markers in plant breeding. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1983, 1, 3-8.
5. Sanghani, A.O.; Sanghani, J.M.; Vaja, M.B.; Mandavia, M.K. Analysis of genetic diversity among tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum mill.) genotypes using biochemical and morphological markers. Indian J. Agric. Biochem. 2014, 27, 40-44.
6. Szczechura, W.; Staniaszek, M.; Habdas, H. Tomato molecular markers. Veg. Crops Res. Bull. 2011, 74, 5-23.
7. Hai Thi Hong, T.; Choi, H.; Cho, M.; Lee, H.; Kim, J. Use of Cf-9 gene-based markers in marker-assisted selection to screen tomato cultivars with resistance to Cladosporium fulvum. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2011, 52, 204-210.
8. Vishwanath, K.; Ananthararayanan, T.V.; Pallavi, H.M.; Ramegowda; Prasad, S.R.; Pallavi, K.P.R.; Shailaja, H. Varietal characterization of tomato cultivars based on rapd markers. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2010, 6, 713-715.
9. Caramante, M.; Corrado, G.; Monti, L.M.; Rao, R. Simple sequence repeats are able to trace tomato cultivars in tomato food chains. Food Control 2011, 22, 549-554.
10. Foolad, M.R.; Panthee, D.R. Marker-assisted selection in tomato breeding. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2012, 31, 93-123.
11. Xie, L.J.; Ying, Y.B.; Ying, T.J.; Yu, H.Y.; Fu, X.P. Discrimination of transgenic tomatoes based on visible/near-infrared spectra. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 584, 379-384.
12. Liu, C.; Liu, W.; Chen, W.; Yang, J.; Zheng, L. Feasibility in multispectral imaging for predicting the content of bioactive compounds in intact tomato fruit. Food Chem. 2015, 173, 482-488.
13. Liu, C.; Liu, W.; Lu, X.; Chen, W.; Yang, J.; Zheng, L. Nondestructive determination of transgenic bacillus thuringiensis rice seeds (oryza sativa l.) using multispectral imaging and chemometric methods. Food Chem. 2014, 153, 87-93.
14. Hahn, F. AE-Automation and Emerging Technologies: Multi-spectral prediction of unripe tomatoes. Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 81, 147-155.
15. Yang, K.S.; Nie, P.C.; Feng, L.; He, Y.; Chen, S.S. Nondestructive identification of cherry-tomato varieties based on multi-spectral image technology. Adv. Mater. Res. 2010, 108, 262-267.
16. Zhang, X.; Liu, F.; He, Y.; Li, X. Application of hyperspectral imaging and chemometric calibrations for variety discrimination of maize seeds. Sensors 2012, 12, 17234-17246.
17. Mahesh, S.; Manickavasagan, A.; Jayas, D.; Paliwal, J.; White, N. Feasibility of near-infrared hyperspectral imaging to differentiate canadian wheat classes. Biosyst. Eng. 2008, 101, 50-57.
18. Cruz-Castillo, J.G.; Ganeshanandam, S.; MacKay, B.R.; Lawes, G.S.; Lawoko, C.R.O.; Woolley, D.J. Applications of canonical discriminant analysis in horticultural research. HortScience 1994, 29, 1115-1119.
19. Wold, S.; Esbensen, K.; Geladi, P. Principal component analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1987, 2, 37-52.
20. Sjöström, M.; Wold, S.; Söderström, B. Pls discriminant plots. In Pattern Recognition in Practice; Kanal, E.S.G.N., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986; pp. 461-470.
21. Sokolova, M.; Lapalme, G. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Inf. Process. Manag. 2009, 45, 427-437.
22. Deleuran, L.C.; Olesen, M.H.; Boelt, B. Spinach seed quality: Potential for combining seed size grading and chlorophyll fluorescence sorting. Seed Sci. Res. 2013, 23, 271-278.
23. Nonogaki, H. Seed germination-The biochemical and molecular mechanisms. Breed. Sci. 2006, 56, 93-105.
24. Pandita, V.; Randhawa, K. Effect of seed size and leaf cutting on seed productivity and quality in beet leaf. Seed Res. 1996, 24, 156-157.
25. Gutterman, Y. Maternal effects on seeds during development. Seed: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2000; pp. 59-84.
26. Gunn, C.R.; Gaffney, F.B. Seed Characteristics of 42 Economically Important Species of Solanaceae in the United States; Technical Bulletin No. 1471; United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1974; p. 34.
27. Xu, H.-R.; Yu, P.; Fu, X.-P.; Ying, Y.-B. On-site variety discrimination of tomato plant using visible-near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2009, 10, 126-132.
28. Xie, L.; Ying, Y.; Ying, T. Classification of tomatoes with different genotypes by visible and short-wave near-infrared spectroscopy with least-squares support vector machines and other chemometrics. J. Food Eng. 2009, 94, 34-39.
29. Smith, J.; Register, J., III. Genetic purity and testing technologies for seed quality: A company perspective. Seed Sci. Res. 1998, 8, 285-294.