On the analysis of phylogenetically paired designs

Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 940-947

  Funk, Jennifer L ^a   Rakovski, Cyril S ^a   Macpherson, J Michael ^a  

^a CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ANOVA; Mixed model; Parameter estimation; Phylogenetically controlled designs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923064346     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20457758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1406     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ackerly, D. D. 2000. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts. Evolution 54:1480-1492.
2. Ackerly, D., and P. Reich. 1999. Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. Am. J. Bot. 86:1272-1281.
3. Agrawal, A. A., P. M. Kotanen, C. E. Mitchell, A. G. Power, W. Godsoe, and J. Klironomos. 2005. Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and belowground enemies. Ecology 86:2979-2989.
4. Bhaskar, R., A. Valiente-Banuet, and D. D. Ackerly. 2007. Evolution of hydraulic traits in closely related species pairs from mediterranean and nonmediterranean environments of North America. New Phytol. 176:718-726.
5. Blaney, C. S., and P. M. Kotanen. 2001. Effects of fungal pathogens on seeds of native and exotic plants: a test using congeneric pairs. J. Appl. Ecol. 38:1104-1113.
6. ten Brink, D. J., H. P. Hendriksma, and H. H. Bruun. 2013. Habitat specialization through germination cueing: a comparative study of herbs from forests and open habitats. Ann. Bot. 111:283-292.
7. Burns, J. H. 2006. Relatedness and environment affect traits associated with invasive and noninvasive introduced Commelinaceae. Ecol. Appl. 16:1367-1376.
8. Burns, J. H., and A. A. Winn. 2006. A comparison of plastic responses to competition by invasive and non-invasive congeners in the Commelinaceae. Biol. Invasions 8:797-807.
9. Davies, T. J., N. J. B. Kraft, N. Salamin, and E. M. Wolkovich. 2012. Incompletely resolved phylogenetic trees inflate estimates of phylogenetic conservatism. Ecology 93:242-247.
10. Davison, A. C., and D. V. Hinkley. 1997. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
11. Dawson, W., D. F. R. P. Burslem, and P. E. Hulme. 2009. Herbivory is related to taxonomic isolation, but not to invasiveness of tropical alien plants. Divers. Distrib. 15:141-147.
12. Donoghue, M. J., and D. D. Ackerly. 1996. Phylogenetic uncertainties and sensitivity analyses in comparative biology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 351:1241-1249.
13. Engelkes, T., and N. J. Mills. 2013. A fast-track for invasion: invasive plants promote the performance of an invasive herbivore. Biol. Invasions 15:101-111.
14. Engelkes, T., E. Morrien, K. J. F. Verhoeven, T. M. Bezemer, A. Biere, J. A. Harvey, et al. 2008. Successful range-expanding plants experience less above-ground and below-ground enemy impact. Nature 456:946-948.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
16. Fine, P. V. A., Z. J. Miller, I. Mesones, S. Irazuzta, H. M. Appel, M. H. H. Stevens, et al. 2006. The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests. Ecology 87:S150-S162.
17. Funk, J. L. 2008. Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. J. Ecol. 96:1162-1174.
18. Funk, J. L., and H. L. Throop. 2010. Enemy release and plant invasion: patterns of defensive traits and leaf damage in Hawaii. Oecologia 162:815-823.
19. Funk, J. L., and P. M. Vitousek. 2007. Resource use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 446:1079-1081.
20. Garland, T. Jr, A. F. Bennett, and E. L. Rezende. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 208:3015-3035.
21. Garnier, E. 1992. Growth analysis of congeneric annual and perennial grass species. J. Ecol. 80:665-675.
22. Grotkopp, E., and M. Rejmanek. 2007. High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 94:526-532.
23. Heard, M. J., and D. F. Sax. 2013. Coexistence between native and exotic species is facilitated by asymmetries in competitive ability and susceptibility to herbivores. Ecol. Lett. 16:206-213.
24. Hoffmann, W. A., B. Orthen, P. Kielse, and V. D. Nascimento. 2003. Comparative fire ecology of tropical savanna and forest trees. Funct. Ecol. 17:720-726.
25. Kempel, A., P. Nater, M. Fischer, and M. van Kleunen. 2013. Plant-microbe-herbivore interactions in invasive and non-invasive alien plant species. Funct. Ecol. 27:498-508.
26. Kenward, M. G., and J. H. Roger. 1997. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983-997.
27. Kirichenko, N., C. Péré, Y. Baranchikov, U. Schaffner, and M. Kenis. 2013. Do alien plants escape from natural enemies of congeneric residents? Yes but not from all. Biol. Invasions 15:2105-2113.
28. Laird, N. M., and J. H. Ware. 1982. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963-974.
29. Maddison, W. P. 2000. Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. J. Theor. Biol. 202:195-204.
30. Muth, N. Z., and M. Pigliucci. 2006. Traits of invasives reconsidered: phenotypic comparisons of introduced invasive and introduced noninvasive plant species within two closely related species. Am. J. Bot. 93:188-196.
31. Parker, I. M., and G. S. Gilbert. 2007. When there is no escape: the effects of natural enemies on native, invasive, and noninvasive plants. Ecology 88:1210-1224.
32. Quinn, G. P., and M. J. Keough. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
33. Reich, P. B., M. B. Walters, and D. S. Ellsworth. 1997. From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 94:13730-13734.
34. Rezende, E. L., and J. A. Diniz-Filho. 2012. Phylogenetic analyses: comparing species to infer adaptations and physiological mechanisms. Compr. Physiol. 2:639-674.
35. Richards, C. L., O. Bossdorf, N. Z. Muth, J. Gurevitch, and M. Pigliucci. 2006. Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 9:981-993.