Fate of manuscripts rejected from the Red Journal

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 3-10

  Holliday, Emma B ^a   Yang, George ^b   Jagsi, Reshma ^c   Hoffman, Karen E ^a   Bennett, Katherine Egan ^d   Grace, Calley ^d   Zietman, Anthony L ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d American Society for Radiation Oncology   (United States)

^e MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; ONCOLOGY;

ACCEPTANCE RATE; H INDICES; IMPACT FACTOR; INTER QUARTILE RANGES; INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS; METHODS AND MATERIALS; MULTI VARIATE ANALYSIS; RADIATION ONCOLOGY;

PUBLISHING;

DOSIMETRY; GENDER; HUMAN; MEDLINE; ONCOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; BIBLIOMETRICS; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRICS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLICATION BIAS; PUBLISHING; PUBMED; RADIATION ONCOLOGY;

EID: 84923063910     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: 1879355X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Knowledge. Journal citation reports, 2013. Available at: admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR?RQ=LIST_SUMMARY_JOURNAL Accessed August 7, 2014.
2. Jagsi R, Bennett KE, Griffith KA, et al. Attitudes toward blinding of peer review and perceptions of efficacy within a small biomedical specialty. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;89:940-946.
3. Nemery B. What happens to the manuscripts that have not been accepted for publication in Occupational and Environmental Medicine? Occup Environ Med 2001;58:604-607.
4. Chew FS. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:627-632.
5. McDonald RJ, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Fate of manuscripts previously rejected by the American Journal of Neuroradiology: A follow-up analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:253-256.
6. McDonald RJ, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Fate of submitted manuscripts rejected from the American Journal of Neuroradiology: Outcomes and commentary. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1430-1434.
7. Silberzweig JE, Khorsandi AS. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19:1620-1623.
8. Liesegang TJ, Shaikh M, Crook JE. The outcomes of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Opthalmology between 2002 and 2003. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:551-560.
9. Dellavalle RP, Harrison C. Reinterpreting the fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;59:723-724.
10. Okike K, Kocher MS, Nwachukwu BU, et al. The fate of manuscripts rejected by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:e130.
11. Wijnhoven BP, Dejong CH. Fate of manuscripts declined by the British Journal of Surgery. Br J Surg 2010;97:450-454.
12. Armstrong AW, Idriss SZ, Kimball AB, et al. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;58:632-635.
13. Zietman A, Bennett KE. The four Rs of the Red Journal:Aprogress report from the new editorial team. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013;87:7-9.
14. Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, et al. The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature - a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med 2006;355:281-287.
15. Sidhu R, Rajashekhar P, Lavin VL, et al. The gender imbalance in academic medicine: A study of female authorship in the United Kingdom. J R Soc Med 2009;102:337-342.
16. Ahmed AA, Egleston B, Holliday E, et al. Gender trends in radiation oncology in the United States: A 30-year analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;88:33-38.
17. Holliday EB, Jagsi R, Wilson LD, et al. Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding among U.S. academic radiation oncology faculty. Acad Med 2014;89:767-773.
18. Papagikos MA, Rossi PJ, Lee WR. Publication rate of abstracts from the annual ASTRO meeting: Comparison with other organizations. J Am Coll Radiol 2005;2:72-75.
19. Sprague S, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, et al. Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:158-163.
20. Laakso M, Bjork BC. Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Med 2012;10:124.
21. BioMed Central. Radiation Oncology. Submission checklist. Available at: http://www.ro-journal.com/manuscript. Accessed August 19, 2014.
22. Public Library of Science. PLOS publication fees. Available at: http://www.plos.org/publications/publication-fees/. Accessed August 19, 2014.
23. Frisch NK, Nathan R, Ahmed YK, et al. Authors attain comparable or slightly higher rates of citation publishing in an open access journal (CytoJournal ) compared to traditional cytopathology journals - a five year (2007-2011) experience. Cytojournal 2014;11:10.
24. Bjork BC, Solomon D. Open access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC Med 2012;10:73.
25. DeCastro R, Sambuco D, Ubel PA, et al. Batting 300 is good: Perspectives of faculty researchers and their mentors on rejection, resilience, and persistence in academic medical careers. Acad Med 2013;88:497-504.