Communication disorders and executive function impairment after severe traumatic brain injury: An exploratory study using the GALI (a grid for linguistic analysis of free conversational interchange)

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 57, Issue 9-10, 2014, Pages 664-683

  Sainson, C ^a   Barat, M ^b   Aguert, M ^c  

^a Université de Bordeaux ^*  (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

Author keywords

Communication; Executive function impairment; Gesture; Interlocutor; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; CONVERSATION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; GAZE; GESTURE; GRID FOR LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LANGUAGE TEST; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAW SCORE; SCORING SYSTEM; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VALIDITY; YOUNG ADULT; BRAIN INJURY; COGNITION DISORDERS; COMMUNICATION DISORDERS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PSYCHOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION DISORDERS; COMMUNICATION DISORDERS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922983430     PISSN: 18770657     EISSN: 18770665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Biddle K.R., McCabe A., Bliss L.S. Narrative skills following traumatic brain injury in children and adults. J Commun Disord 1996, 29:447-469.
2. Coelho C.A. Discourse production deficits following traumatic brain injury: a critical review of the recent literature. Aphasiology 1995, 9:409-429.
3. Coehlo C.A., Liles B.Z., Duffy R.J. Analysis of conversational discourse in head-injured adults. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1995, 6:92-98.
4. Drechsler R. Hétérogénéité sur tous les plans: production de discours et troubles neuropsychologiques chez les patients traumatisés crânio-cérébraux. Psychol Interact 2002, 13-14:109-140.
5. Linscott R.L., Knight R.G., Godfrey H.P.D. The profile of functional impairment in communication (P.F.I.C.): manual for the profile of functional impairment in communication (P.F.I.C.) 1993, Dunedin, Otago.
6. Linscott R.L., Knight R.G., Godfrey H.P.D. The profile of functional impairment in communication (P.F.I.C.): a mesure of communication impairment for clinical use. Brain Inj 1996, 10:397-412.
7. McDonald S., van Sommers P. Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: ability to negociate requests. Cogn Neuropsychol 1993, 10:297-315.
8. McDonald S. Assessing communication disturbances after traumatic brain injury: a cognitive-pragmatic approach. Psychol Interact 2001, 13-14:47-75.
9. Peter Favre C., Dewilde V. Lobes frontaux et langage. Neuropsychologie des lobes frontaux 1999, Solal, Marseille.
10. Prutting C.A., Kirchner D.M. A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. J Speech Hear Disord 1987, 52:105-119.
11. Eslinger P.J., Damasio A.R. Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: patient EVR. Neurology 1985, 35:1731-1741.
12. Levin H.S., Williams D.H., Eisenberg H.M., High W.M., Guinto F.C. Serial MRI and neurobehavioral findings after mild to moderate closed head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992, 55:255-262.
13. Miyake A., Freedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contribution to complex frontal lobe tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 2000, 41:49-100.
14. Peter C. Conversation avec une patiente souffrant de lésions traumatiques bifrontales: ajustements mutuels. Rev Neuropsychol 1995, 5:53-85.
15. Rauscher F.H., Krauss R.M., Chen Y. Gesture, speech and lexical access: the role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychol Sci 1996, 7:226-231.
16. Aubert S., Barat M., Campan M., Dehail P., Joseph P.A., Mazaux J.M. Non verbal communication abilities in severe traumatic brain injury. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2004, 47:135-141.
17. Sainson C. Communication non verbale et dysfonctionnement exécutif post-traumatique: à propos d'un cas. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2007, 50:231-239.
18. McNeill D. Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought 1992, Chicago, MI, Chicago & London.
19. Cosnier J., Brossard A. Communication non verbale, co-texte ou contexte? La communication non verbale 1984, Delachaux et Niestlé, Paris.
20. Cosnier J. Communications et langages gestuels. Les voies du langage: communication verbale, gestuelle et animale 1982, Dunod-Bordas, Paris.
21. Argyle M., Dean J. Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry 1965, 28:289-302.
22. Beaudichon J. Que mesure-t-on dans les expériences consacrées au développement de la communication référentielle? 1985, PUF, Paris.
23. Kendon A. Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica 1967, 26:1-47.
24. Varenne C., Beaudichon J. Régulation intrapersonnelle de la communication référentielle chez l'enfant de 8-9ans: effets de paramètres contextuels. Enfance 1996, 49:411-430.
25. Iverson J., Goldin-Meadow H. What's communication got to do with it? Gesture in children blind from birth. Dev Psychol 1997, 33:453-467.
26. Sainson C. Communication non verbale et dysfonctionnement exécutif post-traumatique: étude multimodale de corpus conversationnels vidéoscopés de 17 patients traumatisés crâniens graves, de 17 IF et de 34 témoins 2008, Université de Provence, Aix en Provence.
27. Fermanian J. Validation of assessment scales in physical medicine and rehabilitation: how are psychometric properties determined?. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2005, 48:281-287.
28. Dardier V. Pragmatique et pathologies: comment étudier les troubles de l'usage du langage 2004, Éditions Bréal, Paris.
29. Contento S. Forme et fonction du geste pour la cohésion discursive. Oralité et Gestualité communication multimodale, interaction 1998, L'Harmattan, Paris.
30. Alibali M.W., Heath D.C., Meyers H.J. Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: some gestures are meant to be seen. J Mem Lang 2001, 44:169-188.
31. Alibali M.W., Kita S., Young A.J. Gesture and the process of speech production: we think, therefore we gesture. Lang Cogn Process 2000, 15:593-613.
32. Melinger A., Kita S. Does gesture help processes of speech production? Evidence for conceptual level facilitation 2001, Linguistics Society Proceedings, Berkeley, CA.
33. Champagne-Lavau M., Stip E., Joanette Y. Cognitive determinants of pragmatic deficits in right brain damaged and schizophrenic individuals: a comparative study. Brain Cogn 2005, 57:278.