Environmental policy and macroeconomic dynamics in a new Keynesian model

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-21

  Annicchiarico, Barbara ^a   Di Dio, Fabio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b Sogei Spa IT Economia Modelli di Previsione ed Analisi Statistiche ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

E32; E50; Environmental policy; Macroeconomic dynamics; Monetary policy; New Keynesian model; Q58

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS;

E32; E50; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS; MONETARY POLICIES; NEW KEYNESIAN MODELS; Q58;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; KEYNESIAN THEORY; MACROECONOMICS; MONETARY POLICY;

EID: 84922978147     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: 10960449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2014.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adjemian, S., Bastani, H., Juillard, M., Mihoubi, F., Perendia, G., Ratto, M., Villemot, S., 2011. Dynare: Reference Manual, Version 4, Dynare Working Papers no. 1, CREPEMAQ.
2. Álvarez L.J., Dhyne E., Hoeberichts M., Kwapil C., Le Bihan H., Lünnemann P., Martins F., Sabbatini R., Stahl H., Vermeulen P., Vilmunen J. Sticky prices in the Euro Area. a summary of new micro-evidence. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2006, 4:575-584.
3. Angelopoulos, K., Economides, G., Philippopoulos, A., 2010. What is the Best Environmental Policy? Taxes, Permits and Rules under Economic and Environmental Uncertainty, CESifo Working Paper series 2980, CESifo Group Munich.
4. Angelopoulos K., Economides G., Philippopoulos A. First-and second-best allocations under economic and environmental uncertainty. Int. Tax Publ. Financ. 2013, 20:360-380.
5. Bils M., Klenow P.J. Some evidence on the importance of sticky prices. J. Polit. Econ. 2004, 112:947-985.
6. Bouman M., Gautier P.A., Hofkes M.W. Do firms time their pollution abatement investments optimally?. De Econ. 2000, 148:71-86.
7. Calvo G. Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. J. Monet. Econ. 1983, 12:383-398.
8. Clarida R., Galí J., Gertler M. The science of monetary policy. a new Keynesian perspective. J. Econ. Lit. 1999, 37:1661-1707.
9. Dhyne E., Alvarez L.J., Le Bihan H., Veronese G., Dias D., Hoffmann J., Jonker N., Lunnemann P., Rumler F., Vilmunen J. Price changes in the Euro Area and the United States. some facts from individual consumer price data. J. Econ. Perspect. 2006, 20:171-192.
10. 2 emissions in Canada. a general equilibrium analysis. Resour. Energy Econ. 2005, 27:187-207.
11. Fischer C., Heutel G. Environmental macroeconomics. environmental policy, business cycles, and directed technical change. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2013, 5:197-210.
12. Fischer C., Springborn M. Emissions targets and the real business cycle. intensity targets versus caps or taxes. J. Env. Econ. Manag. 2011, 62:352-366.
13. Galí J. Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle 2008, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
14. Goulder L.H., Parry I.W.H., Williams III R.C., Burtraw D. The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. J. Publ. Econ. 1999, 72:329-360.
15. Heutel G. How should environmental policy respond to business cycles? Optimal policy under persistent productivity shocks. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 2012, 15:244-264.
16. Hoel M., Karp L. Taxes versus quotas for a stock pollutant. Resour. Energy Econ. 2002, 24:367-384.
17. Jotzo F., Pezzey J.C.V. Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2007, 83:280-286.
18. Judd K. Numerical Methods in Economics 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Kelly D.L. Price and quantity regulation in general equilibrium. J. Econ. Theory 2005, 125:36-60.
20. Kim J., Kim S., Schaumburg E., Sims C.A. Calculating and using second-order accurate solutions of discrete time dynamic equilibrium models. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 2008, 32(11):3397-3414.
21. Klenow P., Malin B. Microeconomic evidence on price-setting. Handbook of Monetary Economics 2011, 231-284. Elsevier, Amsterdam. B. Friedman, M. Woodford (Eds.).
22. Newell, R.G., Pizer, W.A., 2008. Indexed Regulation, Working Paper 13991, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
23. Nordhaus W.D. A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies 2008, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
24. Parry I.W.H., Williams III R.C. Second-Best evaluation of eight policy instruments to reduce carbon emissions. Resour. Energy Econ. 1999, 21:347-373.
25. Pizer, W.A., Kopp, R., 2005. Calculating the costs of environmental regulation. In: Mäler, K.G., Vincent, J.R. (Ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, vol. 3, 1 ed. pp. 1307-1351 (Chapter 25).
26. Quirion P. Does uncertainty justify intensity emission caps?. Resour. Energy Econ. 2005, 27:343-353.
27. Schmitt-Grohé S., Uribe M. Solving dynamic general equilibrium models using a second-order approximation to the policy function. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 2004, 28:755-775.
28. Smets F., Wouters R. Shocks and frictions in US business cycles. a Bayesian DSGE approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 2007, 97:586-606.
29. Stern N. The economics of climate change. Am. Econ. Rev. 2008, 98:1-37.
30. Weitzman M.L. Prices vs. quantities. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1974, 41:477-491.
31. Woodford M. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy 2003, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.