Optimisation of post-combustion CO2 capture for flexible operation

Energy Procedia

Volumn 63, Issue , 2014, Pages 1525-1535

  MacDowell, N ^a   Shah, N ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amine scrubbing; CCS; CO2 capture; Dynamic optimisation; Flexible CCS; Rrate based modelling; Saft; SC PCC

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922921367     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.162     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. 2 capture using flue gas scrubbing with amine solvents. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2004. 218: P. 231-239.
2. 2 capture technologies. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010. 3(11): P. 1645-1669.
3. Boot-Handford, M.E., et al., Carbon capture and storage update. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014. 7(1): P. 130-189.
4. Grossmann, I.E. and R.W.H. Sargent, Optimum design of multipurpose chemical plants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 1979. 18(2): P. 343-348.
5. 2 capture processes using advanced control techniques: Towards operational cost minimisation. Int. J. GHG Con., 2012. 11: P. 236- 250.
6. MacDowell, N. Optimisation of post-combustion CCS for flexible operation. in The 14th Annual APGTF Workshop - The Role of Fossil Fuel Power Plant in Providing Flexible Generation. 2014. London.
7. 2 from flue gas. Comp. Aid. Chem. Eng., 2010. 28(1231-1236).
8. MacDowell, N., et al., Transferable SAFT-VR models for the calculation of the fluid phase equilibria in reactive mixtures of carbon dioxide, water, and n-alkylamines in the context of carbon capture. J. Phys. Chem. B., 2011. 115(25): P. 8155-8168.
9. 2 capture absorption column. Int. J. GHG Con., 2013. 12(247-258).
10. 2 capture process integrated with a supercritical coal-fired power station. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2014 (Under Review).
11. 2 capture process. Int. J. GHG Con., 2014. 27: P. 103- 119.
12. Rodriguez, J., et al., Modelling the fluid phase behaviour of aqueous mixtures of multifunctional alkanolamines and carbon dioxide using transferable parameters with the SAFT-VR approach. Mol. Phys., 2012. 110(11-12): P. 1325-1348.
13. 2 capture: An optimisation study using dynamic process models. Int. J. GHG Con., 2013. 13: P. 44-58.
14. Wijk, P.C.v.d., et al., Benefits of coal-fired power generation with flexible CCS in a future northwest European power system with large scale wind power. Int. J. GHG Con., 2014. 28: P. 216-233.
15. Oates, D.L., et al., Profitability of CCS with flue gas bypass and solvent storage. Int. J. GHG Con., 2014. 27: P. 279-288.
16. Davison, J., Flexible CCS plants-A key to near-zero emission electricity systems. Energy Procedia, 2011. 4: P. 2548-2555.
17. Nimtz, M. and H.-J. Krautz, Flexible Operation of CCS Power Plants to Match Variable Renewable Energies. Energy Procedia, 2013. 40: P. 294-303.
18. Chalmers, H., M. Leach, and J. Gibbins, Built-in flexibility at retrofitted power plants: What is it worth and can we afford to ignore it? Energy Procedia, 2011. 4: P. 2596-2603.
19. Kalinin, A., et al., CCS Chain Capacity Selection for Flexible Load Power Plant. Energy Procedia, 2012. 23: P. 343-353.
20. Ludig, S., M. Haller, and N. Bauer, Tackling long-term climate change together: The case of flexible CCS and fluctuating renewable energy. Energy Procedia, 2011. 4: P. 2580-2587.