Effect of geologic depositional environment on CO2 storage efficiency

Energy Procedia

Volumn 63, Issue , 2014, Pages 5247-5257

  Okwen, Roland ^a   Yang, Fang ^a   Frailey, Scott ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Depositional environment; Formations; Storage efficiency; Structure relief

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922902137     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.556     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Geologic storage formation classification: understanding its importance and impacts on CCS opportunities in the United States. US Department of Energy, DOE/NETL 2010/1420; 2010.
2. Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC). Enhanced oil recovery I: Loudon Single-Well Huff 'n' Puff: DOE Contract DEFC26- 03NT41994; 2009.
3. Frailey SM, Krapac IG, Damico JR, Okwen RT, McKaskle RW. CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery: Bald Unit test site, Mumford Hills Oil Field, Posey County, Indiana. JH Goodwin and Monson CC, editors. Illinois State Geological Survey, Open File Series 2012-5; 2012.
4. Frailey SM, Parris TM, Damico JR, Okwen RT, McKaskle RW. CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery: Sugar Creek Oil Field test site, Hopkins County, Kentucky. CC Monson and Goodwin JH, editors. Illinois State Geological Survey, Open File Series 2012-4; 2012.
5. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEAGHG). Development of storage coefficients for CO2 storage in deep saline formations, Report no. 2009/1; 2009.
6. Burnside NM, Naylor M. Review and implications of relative permeability of CO2/brine systems and residual trapping of CO2. IJGGC 2014; 23: 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.013.
7. Perrin J-C, Benson SM. An experimental study on the influence of sub-corescale heterogeneities on CO2 distribution in reservoir rocks. Transport in Porous Med. 2010; 82 (1): 93-109.
8. Krevor SCM, Pini R, Zuo L, Benson SM. Relative permeability and trappingof CO2 and water in sandstone rocks at reservoir conditions. Water Resour. Res. 2012; 48: W02532, doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010859.
9. Bennion DB, Bachu S. Drainage and imbibition relative permeability relationships for supercritical CO2/brine and H2S/brine systems in intergranular sandstone, carbonate, shale, and anhydrite rocks. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 2008; 11 (3): 487-496.
10. Bennion DB, Bachu S. Drainage and imbibition CO2/brine relative permeability curves at reservoir conditions for high-permeability carbonate rocks. SPE 134028 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 9-22 September 2010.
11. Shi J-Q, Xue Z, Durucan S. Supercritical CO2 core flooding and imbibitionin Berea sandstone-CT imaging and numerical simulation. Energ. Proc. 2011; 4: 5, 001-5, 008.
12. Shi J-Q, Xue Z, Durucan S. Supercritical CO2 core flooding and imbibi-tion in Tako sandstone-influence of sub-core scale heterogeneity. IJGGC 2011; 5 (1): 75-87.
13. Pentland CH, El-Maghraby R, Georgiadis A, Iglauer S, Blunt MJ. Immiscible displacements and capillary trapping in CO2 storage. Energy Proc. 2011; 4: 4969-4976.
14. Pentland CH, El-Maghraby R, Iglauer S, Blunt MJ. Measurements of thecapillary trapping of super-critical carbon dioxide in Berea sandstone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011; 38 (6): L06401.
15. Shell. UK carbon capture and storage demonstration competition. UKCCS-KT-S7.19-Shell-002, SCAL Report. Scottish Power CCS Consortium; 2011.
16. Mackay E, Pickup G, Olden P. Rock mechanics, geochemistry and aquiferfluid flow. In: CASSEM Conference, Edinburgh, 4 October 2010.