Judicial Restraint in America: How the Ageless Wisdom of the Federal Courts was Invented

Judicial Restraint in America: How the Ageless Wisdom of the Federal Courts was Invented

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-248

  Tsen Lee, Evan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Activists; John Marshall; Judges; Judicial Restraint; Property Rights; Protestant Idealism; Scientific Pragmatism; Supreme Court; Warren Court

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922896596     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340341.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (46)

1. Barry Friedman, The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part One: The Road to Judicial Supremacy, 73 N.Y.U. L. REV. 333 (1998)
2. The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Two: Reconstruction's Political Court, 91 GEO. L. J. 1 (2002)
3. The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Three: The Lesson of Lochner, 76 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1383 (2001)
4. The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Four: Law's Politics, 148 U. PA. L. REV. 971 (2000)
5. The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five, 112 YALE L. J. 153 (2002).
6. Reuel E. Schiller, The Era of Deference: Courts, Expertise, and the Emergence of New Deal Administrative Law, 106 MICH. L. REV. 399, 419 (2007).
7. Barry Cushman, Some Varieties and Vicissitudes of Lochnerism, 85 B.U. L. REV. 881, 908-18 (2005)
8. Owen M. Fiss, Dombrowski, 86 YALE L. J. 1103 (1977).
9. Robert P. Moses, An Earned Insurgency: Quality Education as a Constitutional Right, 79 HARV. EDUC. REV. 370, 371 (Summer 2009).
10. William J. Brennan addressed to Chief Justice Warren and Justices Black and Douglas, Jan. 27, 1962
11. William A. Fletcher, The Structure of Standing, 98 YALE L. J. 221 (1988).
12. Evan Caminker, The Constitutionality of Qui Tam Actions, 99 YALE L. J. 341 (1989).
13. Cass Sunstein, Standing and the Privatization of Public Law, 88 COLUM.L. REV. 1432, 1451-60.
14. Robert E. Gamer, Justice Brewer and Substantive Due Process: A Conservative Court Revisited, 18 VANDERBILT L. REV. 615 (1965).
15. David Currie, Sovereign Immunity and Suits Against Government Officers, 1984 SUP. CT. REV. 149, 151 & n. 11.
16. DANIEL R. ERNST, LAWYERS AGAINST LABOR: FROM INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS TO CORPORATE LIBERALISM 27-28 (Univ. of Illinois Press 1995).
17. DOROTHY ROSS, THE ORIGINS OF AMERICAN SOCIAL SCIENCE 54 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991).
18. LINDA PRZYBYSZEWSKI, THE REPUBLIC ACCORDING TO JOHN MARSHALL HARLAN 54 (Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1999).
19. EDMUND WILSON, PATRIOTIC GORE: STUDIES IN THE LITERATURE OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 753 (Farrar, Straus, & Giroux 1962).
20. Thomas C. Grey, Langdell's Orthodoxy, 45 U. PITT. L. REV. 1, 11 (1983).
21. Roscoe Pound, Liberty of Contract, 18 YALE L. J. 454, 464 (1909).
22. G. Edward White, From Sociological Jurisprudence to Realism: Jurisprudence and Social Change in Early Twentieth-Century America, 58 VA. L. REV. 999, 1003 (1972)
23. G. Edward White, The Integrity of Holmes' Jurisprudence, 10 HOFSTRA L. REV. 633 (1982).
24. G. Edward White, Revisiting James Bradley Thayer, 88 NW. L. REV. 48, 74 (1993).
25. CHARLES F. HOBSON, THE GREAT CHIEF JUSTICE: JOHN MARSHALL AND THE RULE OF LAW 6 (Univ. Press of Kansas 1996).
26. Ruth Wedgwood, The Revolutionary Martyrdom of Jonathan Robbins, 100 YALE L.J. 229 (1990).
27. Paul M. Bator, Finality in the Criminal Law and Federal Habeas Corpus for State Prisoners, 76 HARV. L. REV. 441 (1963).
28. ALEXANDER BICKEL, THE SUPREME COURT AND THE IDEA OF PROGRESS 173 (Harper & Row 1970).
29. JOHN HART ELY, DEMOCRACY AND DISTRUST: A THEORY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW 92 (Harv. Univ. Press 1980).
30. Bruce Ackerman, The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution, 93 YALE L.J. 1013 (1984).
31. Akhil Reed Amar, Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V, 55 U. CHI. L. REV. 1043 (1988).
32. MARK V. TUSHNET, TAKING THE CONSTITUTION AWAY FROM THE COURTS (Harv. Univ. Press 2000).
33. Larry D. Kramer, Foreword: We the Court, 115 HARV. L. REV. 4, 169 (2001).
34. LARRY D. KRAMER, THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES: POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM AND JUDICIAL REVIEW (Oxford U. Press 2004) 144
35. Ashutosh Bhagwat, Cooper v. Aaron and the Faces of Federalism, 52 ST. LOUIS UNIV. L. J. 1087 (2008).
36. Edwin Meese III, Perspective on the Authoritativeness of Supreme Court Decision: The Law of the Constitution, 61 TULANE L. REV. 979 (1987).
37. H. L. A. Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, 71 HARV. L. REV. 593 (1958)
38. Lon L. Fuller, Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart, 71 HARV. L. REV. 630 (1958)
39. Larry Alexander & Frederick Schauer, On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation, 110 HARV. L. REV. 1359 (1997)
40. Larry Alexander & Frederick Schauer, Defending Judicial Supremacy: A Reply, 17 CONST. COMM. 455 (2000).
41. OWEN M. FISS, TROUBLED BEGINNINGS OF THE MODERN STATE, 1888-1910 at 167 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993).
42. EDWARD A. PURCELL, JR., BRANDEIS AND THE PROGRESSIVE CONSTITUTION 120 (Yale Univ. Press, 2000).
43. MICHAEL J. BRODHEAD, DAVID J. BREWER: THE LIFE OF A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, 1837-1910 at 154 (Southern Ill. Univ. Press, 1994).
44. Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation, 497 U.S. 871, 889 (1990).
45. GERALD HORNE, FIRE THIS TIME: THE WATTS UPRISING AND THE 1960s (Univ. of Va. Press 1995).
46. Abram Chayes, The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1281 (1976).