The judicial process: Realism, pragmatism, practical reasoning and principles

The Judicial Process: Realism, Pragmatism, Practical Reasoning and Principles

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-414

  Thomas, E W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922876485     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493768     Document Type: Book

References (286)

1. Reasoning with Law (Hart Publishing Oxford and Portland Oregon, 2001), at 20-21.
2. Lord Reid, ‘The Judge as Lawmaker’ (1972) 12
3. Tom Bingham, The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000), at 29.
4. Malcolm M. Feeley and Edward L. Rubin, Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
5. Timothy A.O. Endicott, Vagueness in Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000), at 182.
6. George C. Christie, ‘The Universal Audience and Predictive Theories of Law’ (1986) 5
7. Hilaire McCoubrey and Nigel White, Textbook on Jurisprudence (3rd edn, Blackstone Press Limited, London, 1999)
8. J.W. Harris, Legal Philosophies (2nd edn, Butterworths, London, 1980)
9. Ian Ward, An Introduction to Critical Legal Theory (Cavendish Publishing Ltd., London, 1998)
10. Brian Bix, Jurisprudence: Theory and Context (3rd edn, Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1996)
11. Roger Cotterrell, The Politics of Jurisprudence (Butterworths, London, 1989)
12. George P. Fletcher, Basic Concepts of Legal Thought (Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 1996).
13. Stanley Fish, Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989)
14. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, ‘Reflections on Preclusion of Judicial Review in England and the United States’, (1986) 27
15. ‘The Conscience of the Law’ (2000) Vol. 8, No. 1
16. A Critique of Adjudication (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1998), at 20
17. E.W. Thomas, A Return to Principle in Judicial Reasoning and an Acclamation of Judicial Autonomy (1993) 4
18. R. W. M. Dias, Jurisprudence (5th edn, Butterworths, London, 1985), at 152.
19. Lord Radcliffe, The Law and its Compass (Faber & Faber, London, 1961), at 39
20. Alan Paterson, The Law Lords (Macmillan, London, 1982), at 140-141.
21. Lord Radcliffe, ‘The Lawyer and His Times’ in Arthur E. Sutherland (ed.), The Path of the Law (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1968), at 14-15.
22. Alan Paterson, The Law Lords, at 142.
23. John T. Noonan Jr. Narrowing the Nation’s Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States, (University of California Press, Berkley, Calif. 2002), at 144.
24. Jules Coleman, The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001), at 70-71.
25. E. P. Soper, ‘Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge; the Hart/Dworkin Dispute’ (1977) 75
26. H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 1961), at 77-132.
27. T. M. Benditt, ‘The Rule of Precedent’, in L. Goldstein (ed.), Precedent in Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987), at 103.
28. Justice W. D. Baragwanath, ‘The Dynamics of the Common Law’ (1987) 6
29. Jeremy Waldron, ‘Normative (or Ethical) Positivism’ in Jules Coleman (ed.), Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001), at 411.
30. Tom Campbell, The Legal Theory of Ethical Positivism (Dartmouth Pub. Co., Aldershot, 1996).
31. Richard A. Posner, ‘Book Review: Review of Jeremy Waldron, Law and Disagreement’ (2000) 100 Colum. LR. 582
32. A. D. Lindsay, The Modern Democratic State (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1943), Vol. 1, at 269.
33. The Politics of Jurisprudence (Butterworths, London, 1989), at 119
34. Jeremy Bentham, A Comment on the Commentaries and a Fragment on Government; J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart (University of London, Athlone Press, London, 1977).
35. James Allan, ‘The Invisible Hand in Justice Thomas’s Philosophy of Law’ (1999) Pt II
36. John Laws, ‘Law and Democracy’ (1995) Public Law 72
37. Stephen Sedley, ‘Human Rights: A Twenty-First Century Agenda’, (1995) Public Law 386
38. E. W. Thomas, ‘The Relationship of Parliament and the Courts: A Tentative Thought or Two for the New Millennium’ (2000) 31
39. K. J. Scott, The New Zealand Constitution (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1962)
40. Ernest J. Weinrib, ‘Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law’, (1998) 97
41. Edward L. Rubin, ‘Law and the Mythology of Law’ (1997)
42. Duncan Kennedy’s answer to the question, ‘What is formalism?’, A Critique of Adjudication (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1998), at 105-107.
43. Frederick Schauer, Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).
44. Richard H. Fallon, ‘Propter Honoris Respectum: Ruminations on the Work of Frederick Schauer’ (1997)
45. Mark V. Tushnet, ‘Playing With the Rules’ (1992) 90
46. Anthony J. Sebok, ‘Propter Honoris Respectum: Is the Rule of Recognition a Rule?’ (1997) 72
47. Dr James Farmer QC, ‘The New Zealand Court of Appeal: Maintaining Quality after the Privy Council’ in Rick Bigwood (ed.), Legal Method in New Zealand (Butterworths, Wellington, 2001), at 244-245.
48. D. McGee, ‘Patent Nonsense’ (1986) 49
49. Malise Ruthven, Fundamentalism: The Search for Meaning (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).
50. Stuart Sim, Fundamentalist World: The New Dark Age of Dogma (Icon Books, Thriplow, 2004).
51. Jack Hodder, ‘Departure from ‘‘Wrong’’ Precedents by Final Appellate Courts: Disagreeing with Professor Harris’ [2003] NZLR 161.
52. Roscoe Pound, The Spirit of the Common Law (Marshall Jones Company, Boston 1931), at 57.
53. Malcolm M. Feeley and Edward L. Rubin, Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Court’s Reformed America’s Prisons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), at 330.
54. Martin Loughlin, ‘Rights, Democracy, and Law’ in Tom Campbell and K. D. Ewing (eds.), Special Essays on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001), 41
55. The Principles of Representative Government (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997), at 192.
56. J. Dunn (ed.) Democracy: The Unfinished Journey 508 BC to AD 1993 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992), at 247-248.
57. Linda deLeon, ‘Administrative Reform and Democratic Accountability’ in Walter J. M. Kickert (ed.), Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe, (Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham, 1997), at 233-248.
58. Colin Turpin, ‘Ministerial Responsibility: Myth or Reality?’ in J. Jowell and D. Oliver (eds.), The Changing Constitution (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985), at 48-76
59. Norman Lewis and Diane Longley, ‘Ministerial Responsibility: The Next Steps’ (1996) Public Law 490
60. Richard Scott, ‘Ministerial Accountability’ (1996) Public Law 410
61. Dawn Oliver, ‘Law, Politics and Public Accountability. The Search for a New Equilibrium’ (1994) Public Law 238
62. Diana Woodhouse, ‘Analysis Ministerial Responsibility: The Abdication through the Receipt of Legal Advice’ (1993) Public Law 412
63. Diana Woodhouse, ‘Ministerial Responsibility: Something Old, Something New’ (1997) Public Law 262.
64. B. Guy Peters and Donald J. Savoie (eds.), Governance in the Twenty-first Century: Revitalizing the Public Service (McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal, 2000)
65. Christopher Pollitt and Geert Bouckaert, Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000)
66. R. Mulgan and J. Uhr, ‘Accountability and Governments’ in Glyn Davis (ed.), Are You Being Served? State, Citizens and Governance (Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 2001), 152
67. Gava J, ‘The Rise of the Hero Judge’ (2001) 24
68. Hon. Justice Michael Adams, ‘Heroes and Heresy: Myth Meets Legal Fundamentalism’ (2004) 78
69. Mark Tushnet, ‘Scepticism about Judicial Review: A Perspective from the United States’ in Tom Campbell, K. D. Ewing and Adam Tomkins (eds.), Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001), 359
70. Philip A. Joseph, Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand (2nd edn, Brookers, Wellington, 2001), at 461-512
71. William Wayne Justice, ‘The Two Faces of Judicial Activism’ (1992) 61
72. The Discipline of Law (Butterworths, London, 1979), at 314
73. Bernard L. Shientag, ‘The Opinions and Writings of Judge Benjamin N Cardozo’ (1930) 30
74. R. F. V. Heuston, ‘Lord Denning: AMan and His Times’ from J. L. Jowell and J. P. W. B. McAuslan (eds.) Lord Denning: The Judge and the Law (Sweet & Maxwell, London 1984), 1
75. Edmund Heward, Lord Denning, A Biography (Barry Rose Law Publishers Ltd., Chichester, 1997), at 230.
76. Robert L. Stern, ‘The Commerce Clause on the National Economy (1933-46)’ (1946) 59
77. David Kairys (ed.) in the ‘Introduction’ to The Politics of Law (Basic Books, New York, 1982), at 8
78. John T. Noonan, Narrowing the Nation’s Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States (University of California Press, Berkley, Calif., 2002), at 9-14
79. Martin Shapiro, Law and Politics in the Supreme Court: New Approaches to Political Jurisprudence (The Free Press of Glencoe Collier-Macmillan, London, 1964)
80. John Braithwaite, ‘Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty’ (2002) 27
81. David Robertson, Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998), at 48-55.
82. Lon L. Fuller, ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’, (1978) 92
83. Stephen Todd (gen. ed.), The Law of Torts in New Zealand (3rd edn, Brookers, Wellington, 2001), at 222.
84. Williams v Natural Life Foods [1998] 2
85. Christian Witting, ‘Justifying Liability to Third Parties for Negligent Misstatements’ (2000) OJLS 20
86. Kit Barker, ‘Unreliable Assumptions in the Modern Law of Negligence’ (1993) 109 LQR 461
87. J. Stapleton, ‘Duty of Care and Economic Loss: A Wider Agenda’ (1991) 107 LQR 249
88. John Ralston Saul, On Equilibrium (Penguin Books, Toronto, 2001), at 7-16.
89. K. A. Warner, ‘Judicial Reasoning and Precedent: Negligently Inflicted Psychological Injuries’ (1990) 10
90. Lord Devlin, The Judge (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979), at 13
91. J. Bowring (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham (Tait, Edinburgh, 1843), Vol. 2, at 306.
92. R. M. Unger, ‘The Critical Legal Studies Movement’ (1983) 96
93. Timothy A. O. Endicott, Vagueness in Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000), at 1.
94. R. Cross, Precedent in English Law (2nd edn, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1968), at 29.
95. P. S. Atiyah, Law and Modern Society (Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 1983), at 95.
96. R.W.M. Dias, Jurisprudence (5th edn, Butterworths, London, 1985), at 157
97. C. G. Weeramantry, The Law in Crisis (Capemoss, London, 1975), at 85.
98. Jerome Frank, Courts on Trial (New Jersey Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973), at 15
99. Legal Systems and Lawyers’ Reasonings (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1964), at 263-270.
100. Precedent and Law (Butterworths, Sydney, 1985), at 123-128.
101. Andrew Halpin, Reasoning with Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2001)
102. Anthony Mason, ‘The Use and Abuse of Precedent’ (1988)
103. H. Carter, Reason in Law (Longman, New York, 1998), at 25-26.
104. E. Mensch, ‘The History of Mainstream Legal Thought’, in David Kairys (ed.) The Politics of Law (Basic Boolis, New York, 1982), at 34.
105. C. P. Banks, ‘Reversals of Precedent and Judicial Policy-Making: How Judicial Conceptions of Stare Decisis in the US Supreme Court Influence Social Change’ (1999) 32
106. C. G. Weeramantry, The Law in Crisis: Bridges of Understanding (Capemoss, London, 1975), at 82.
107. J. A. Farmer, ‘The New Zealand Court of Appeal: Maintaining Quality After the Privy Council’ in Rick Bigwood (ed.), Legal Method in New Zealand (Butterworths, Wellington, 2001), at 237.
108. Michael Taggart (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s: Problems and Prospects (Oxford University Press in association with the Legal Research Foundation, New York and Auckland 1986), at ix.
109. Rick Bigwood (ed.), Legal Method in New Zealand (Butterworths, Wellington, 2001), at 141.
110. Roscoe Pound, The Spirit of the Common Law (Marshall Jones Company, Boston, 1931), at 105-106.
111. C. K. Allen, Law in the Making (7th edn, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1964), at 243.
112. A. H. Knight, Life of the Law, (Crown Publishers, New York, 1996), at 41
113. H. P. Monaghan, ‘Our Perfect Constitution’ (1981) 56
114. F. H. Easterbrook, ‘Stability and Reliability in Judicial Decisions’ (1988) 73
115. H. P. Monaghan, ‘Stare Decisis and Constitutional Adjudication’ (1988) 88
116. C. J. Cooper, ‘Stare Decisis: Precedent and Principle in Constitutional Adjudication’ (1988) 73
117. M. Gerhardt, ‘The Role of Precedent in Constitutional Decision-Making and Theory’ (1991) 60
118. R. Cross and J. W. Harris, Precedent and the English Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991), at 3.
119. R. W. M. Dias, Jurisprudence (5th edn, Butterworths, London, 1985), at 56.
120. E. L. Lambert and M. J. Wasserman, ‘The Case Method in Canada and the Possibilities of its Adaption to the Civil Law’ (1929) 39
121. Mr Justice Lockhart, ‘The Doctrine of Precedent - Today and Tomorrow’ (1987) 3
122. Black’s Law Dictionary (6th edn, West Pub. Co., St. Paul, Minn., 1990), at 1406
123. E. W. Thomas, ‘A Return to Principle in Judicial Reasoning and an Acclamation of Judicial Autonomy’ 4 (1993)
124. Anthony Mason, ‘The Use and Abuse of Precedent’ (1998) 94
125. T. N. Benditt, ‘The Rule of Precedent’ in L. Goldstein (ed.), Precedent in Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987), at 91-93.
126. L. H. Carter, Reason in Law (Longman, New York, 1998), at 104
127. Jerome Frank, Courts on Trial (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973), at 270.
128. Law and the Modern Mind (Peter Smith, Gloucester, 1930), at 21-22.
129. C. P. Banks, ‘Reversals of Precedent and Judicial Policy-Making: How Judicial Conceptions of Stare Decisis in the US Supreme Court Influence Social Change’ (1999) 32 Akron LR 233, at 239.
130. J. Evans, ‘Precedent in the Nineteenth Century’ in Goldstein (ed.), Precedent in Law, at 37.
131. D. Lyons, ‘Formal Justice, Moral Commitment, and Judicial Precedent’ (1984) 81 Journal of Philosophy 580
132. T. R. Lee, ‘Stare decisis in Historical Perspective: From the Founding Era to the Rehnquist Court’ (1999) 52 Vanderbilt LR 647
133. C. G. Weeramantry, ‘Judicial Reasoning and the Common Law’ (Papers of the Ninth Commonwealth Law Conference, 1990), at 84.
134. Lord Devlin, The Judge (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979), at 201.
135. Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1921), at 149.
136. C. J. Peters, ‘Foolish Consistency: On Equality, Integrity and Justice in Stare Decisis’ (1996) 105 Yale LJ 2031.
137. B. V. Harris, ‘Final Courts Overruling their Own ‘‘Wrong’’ Precedents: the Ongoing Search for Principle’ [2002] 118 LQR 408.
138. Alan Paterson, The Law Lords (Macmillan, London, 1982), at 170-189
139. Malcolm M. Feeley and Edward L. Rubin, Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), at 252.
140. John Steyn, ‘Does Legal Formalism Hold Sway in England?’ (1996) 49 II Current Legal Problems, 43
141. Ernest J. Weinrib, ‘Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law’ (1998) 97 Yale LJ, No. 6
142. Dennis Patterson, ‘Why Should the Law be Immune from Superior or Possibly Superior Values?’ Law and Truth (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996), at 22-42.
143. R. Dworkin, ‘Is Law a System of Rules?’ in Robert S. Summers (ed.), Essays in Legal Philosophy (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1970), at 34.
144. H. Lucke, ‘The Common Law: Judicial Impartiality and Judge-Made Law’ (1982) 98 LQR 29
145. R.M. Unger, ‘The Critical Legal Studies Movement’ (1983) 96 Harv. LR 561
146. R. Dworkin, ‘Political Judges and the Rule at Law’, Proceeding British Academy, London (1978) Vol. LXJV 259
147. R. Dworkin, ‘Social Rules and Legal Theory’ (1972) 81 Yale LJ 855
148. David Pannick, ‘A Note on Dworkin and Precedent’ (1980) 43 MLR 30
149. E. P. Soper, ‘Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge; the Hart/Dworkin Dispute’ (1977) 75 Mich. LR 473
150. A.C. Hutchinson and J.N. Wakefield, ‘A Hard Look at ‘‘Hard Cases’’; The Nightmare of a Noble Dreamer’ (1982) 2 OJLS 86
151. J. Raz, ‘Professor Dworkin’s Theory of Rights’ (1978) 26 Pol. Stud. 123
152. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Duckworth, London, 1977), at 90-93.
153. Ronald Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1998), at 244.
154. George C. Christie’s book review, ‘Dworkin’s Empire’ (1987) Duke LJ 157
155. Harry H. Wellington, ‘Common Law Rules and Constitutional Double Standards: Some notes on Adjudication’ (1973) Yale LJ 83, at 222.
156. H. L. A. Hart, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983), at 141.
157. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 1978), at 149.
158. Lord Reid, ‘The Judge as Lawmaker’ (1972) 12 JSPTL 22
159. J. W. Harris, Legal Philosophies (2nd edn, Butterworths, London, 1980), at 149.
160. N. E. Simmonds, Central Issues in Jurisprudence: Justice, Law and Rights (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1986), at 149.
161. W. Twining, Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement (Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London, 1973), at 503.
162. R. S. Bell, ‘Understanding the Model of Rules: Toward a Reconciliation of Dworkin and Positivism’ (1972) 81 Yale LJ 912
163. M. Atkinson, ‘Trigwell in the High Court: Judicial Opinion v Legal Principle: A Case of Bad Law from Bad Philosophy’ (1979-1982) 9 Syd. LR 541.
164. W. Twining, Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement (Weiderfeld and Nicholson, London, 1973), at 3.
165. R. W. M. Dias, Jurisprudence (5th edn, Butterworths, London, 1985), at 503.
166. The Nature and Sources of the Law (Macmillan, New York, 1921), at 123.
167. Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Nature of Judicial Process (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1921), at 126
168. Jerome Frank, Law and the Modern Mind (Peter Smith, Gloucester, 1930), at 50-55.
169. K. Llewellyn, Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962), at 55-57.
170. Patterns of American Jurisprudence (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995), at 224.
171. Malcolm M. Feeley and Edward L. Rubin, Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), at 207-210
172. Antonin Scalia, ‘The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules’ (1989) 56 Univ. of Chic. LR 1175.
173. George P. Fletcher, Basic Concepts of Legal Thought (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996), at 11.
174. Timothy A. O. Endicott, Vaguness in Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000), at 188-203.
175. Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Norms (translated byMichael Hartney Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991), at 124
176. D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers (eds.), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Ashgate, Dartmouth, 1997), MacCormick and Summers, ‘Further general reflections and conclusions’, 531
177. Johan d. van der Vyver, ‘Sovereignty in Human Rights in Constitutional and International Law’ (1991) Emery International LR, 321, at 385-386.
178. Andrew Butler, ‘Strengthening the Bill of Rights’ (2000) 31 VUWLR 129, at 133.
179. W. Brian Arthur, ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events’ (1989) 99 Econ. J 116.
180. E.W. Thomas, A Return to Principle in Judicial Reasoning and an Acclamation of Judicial Autonomy 4 (1993) VUWLR Mono.5 (‘Monograph’), at 54-56.
181. Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1921), esp. at 115-119
182. Louis L. Jaffe, English and American Judges as Lawmakers (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1969), at 75-76.
183. M. Moore, ‘Precedent, Induction, and Ethical Generalization’ in L. Goldstein (ed.), Precedent in Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987), at 187.
184. Tom Bingham, The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000), at 31.
185. P. Hogg and A. Bushell, ‘The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures’, 35 Osgood Hall LJ 75 (1997)
186. Mark Tushnet, ‘Judicial Review of Legislation’ in Peter Cane and Mark Tushnet (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 2004), 164, at 175-176.
187. ‘Parliamentary Supremacy and the Judicial Function’ (1996) 112 LQR, at 177.
188. Dr James Farmer QC, ‘The New Zealand Court of Appeal:Maintaining Quality after the Privy Council’ in Rick Bigwood (ed.), Legal Method in New Zealand (Butterworths, Wellington, 2001), at 237.
189. A. Ross, On Law and Justice (Stevens & Sons, London, 1958), at 274-275.
190. Robert C. Solomon and Mark C. Murphy, What is Justice? Classic and Contemporary Readings (Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 1990), at 13
191. J. W. Harris, Legal Philosophies (2nd edn, Butterworths, London, 1980), at 262.
192. John Steyn, ‘Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men’ (1997) 113 LQR 433
193. David Goddard, ‘Long-term Contracts: a Law and Economics Perspective’ [1997] NZLR 423
194. Martin Loughlin, ‘Rights, Democracy, and Law’ in Tom Campbell and K.D. Ewing (eds.), Special Essays on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001), at 152.
195. Neil Duxbury, Patterns of American Jurisprudence (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995)
196. Malcolm M. Feeley and Edward L. Rubin, Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
197. Daniel A. Farber, ‘Toward a New Realism’ [2001] Chic. LR, 279
198. John Braithwaite, ‘Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty’ (2002) 27 Aust. Journal of Legal Philosophy 47.
199. Roger Cotterrell, The Politics of Jurisprudence (Butterworths, London 1989), at 187-188.
200. Ian Ward, An Introduction to Critical Legal Theory (Cavendish Publishing Limited, London, 1998), at 139.
201. Richard Rorty ‘Solidarity or Objectivity?’ in John Rajchman and Cornel West (eds.), Post-Analytical Philosophy (Columbia University Press, New York, 1988).
202. Martin Loughlin, Public Law and Political Theory (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992), at 126.
203. J. Dewey, Philosophy and Civilization (Littlebrown, New York, 1963), at 55.
204. F. H. Burkhart and others (eds.), The Will to Believe. The Works of William James (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1979), at 158
205. W. James, Pragmatism (Longmans, Green & Co., London, 1907), Lecture 2.
206. O. W. Holmes, The Common Law (Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1981), at 1.
207. Hilaire McCoubrey and Nigel White, Textbook on Jurisprudence (3rd edn, Blackstone Press, London, 1999), at 161.
208. Peter Spiller, New Zealand Court of Appeal 1958-1996: A History (Thomson Brookers, Wellington 2002).
209. R. Posner, The Problems of Jurisprudence (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1990).
210. Mark G. Kelman ‘Trashing’ (1984) 36 Stanford LR 293
211. M. Kelman, A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1987), at 115-137.
212. Joseph Raz, Practical Reason and Norms (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
213. James Penner, ‘The Rules of Law: Wittgenstein, Davidson, and Weinrib’s Formalism’ (1998) Vol. 46, No. 2, T. Fac. LR 488
214. Alasdair McIntyre, After Virtue (2nd edn, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana 1984)
215. Vincent Wellman ‘Practical Reasoning and Judicial Justification: Towards an Adequate Theory’ (1985) 57 Colo. LR 45.
216. Donald Davidson, ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’ in Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984).
217. Daniel A. Farber, ‘The Inevitability of Practical Reason: Statutes, Formalism, and the Rule of Law’ (1992) 45 Vanderbilt LR 533.
218. P. S. Atiyah, Pragmatism and Theory in English Law (Hamlyn Lectures - 39th series, Stevens, London, 1987), at 68-69.
219. John T. Noonan Jr., Narrowing the Nation’s Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States (University of California Press, Berkley, Calif., 2002), at 144.
220. Jerome Frank, Courts on Trial (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973), at 74.
221. H. Hart and A. Sachs, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in theMaking and Application of Law (The Foundation Press, Westbury, N.Y., 1994).
222. John Steyn, ‘Does Legal Formalism Hold Sway in England?’ (1996) 49 II Current Legal Problems 43
223. Peter Cane, ‘Consequences in Judicial Reasoning’ in Jeremy Horder (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (4th Series, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000), at 41.
224. Duncan Kennedy, A Critique of Adjudication (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1998), at 144-148.
225. The End of History and the Last Man (Penguin, London, 1992).
226. Lord Hoffmann, ‘Common Sense and Causing Loss’, Lecture to the Chancery Bar Association, 15 June 1999.
227. Jane Stapleton, ‘Law, Causation and Common Sense’ (1988) 8 OJLS, 111.
228. Roscoe Pound, ‘The Limits of Effective Legal Action’ (1917) 3 American Bar Assoc. Journal, 55
229. John Dickinson ‘The Law Behind Law’ Colum. LR 29 (1929), at 113-46.
230. Neil Duxbury, Patterns of American Jurisprudence (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995), at 222.
231. Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1921), at 167
232. Lon L. Fuller, ‘Reasons and Fiat in Case Law’ (1946) Harv. LR 59
233. Herbert Wechsler ‘Towards Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law’ (1959) Harv. LR 73
234. R. Dworkin, ‘Is Law a System of Rules?’ in Robert S. Summers (ed.) Essays in Legal Philosophy (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1970), at 58.
235. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Duchworth, London, 1977), at 217.
236. James Russell Lowell, 1819-1891, Democracy, and Other Addresses (Houghton, Mifflin, 1887).
237. J. Rawls, ‘Two Concepts of Rules’ (1955) in Rawls’ Collected Papers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1999), at 36-38.
238. H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994), at 144-145.
239. Taking Rights Seriously (Duckworth, London, 1977), at 24
240. Allan C. Hutchinson, ‘The Reasoning Game: Some Pragmatic Suggestions’ (1998) 61 MLR 263
241. Fernando Atria, On Law and Legal Reasoning (Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland Oregon, 2001), at 8.
242. Hon. Lord Denning in The Closing Chapter (Butterworths, London, 1983), at 275-276.
243. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Clarendon Press: New York and Oxford, 1997).
244. Richard W. Wright, ‘Right, Justice and Tort Law’ in David G. Owen (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995), at 166-174
245. Jules Coleman, The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001), at 5
246. J. A. G. Griffith, The Politics of the Judiciary (1st edn, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1977) at 180.
247. Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Nature of Judicial Process (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1921), at 12.
248. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1972).
249. Tom Campbell, Justice (St Martin’s Press, LLC, Basingstoke, 1988)
250. N. Seddon, ‘Compulsion in Commercial Dealings’, in P.D. Finn (ed.), Essays on Restitution (Law Book Company, North Rhyde, NSW, 1990), at 139-142.
251. P. S. Atiyah, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Clarendon Press, Oxford and New York, 1979).
252. Michael Rosenfeld, ‘Contract and Justice: The Relationship between Classical Contract Law and Social Contract Theory’ (1985) 70 Iowa LR 769
253. Charles Whelan, Naked Economics (WW Horton & Company, New York and London, 2002), at 36.
254. Mason CJ and Wilson J have said, ‘competition by its very nature is deliberate and ruthless’ in Queensland Wine Industries Pty Ltd v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1989) 63 ALJR 181
255. M. Halliwell, Equity & Good Conscience in a Contemporary Context (Old Bailey Press, London, 1977), 1.
256. R. P. Meagher, W.M. C. Gummow and J. R. F. Lehane, Meagher, Gummow and Lehane’s Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (4th edn, Butterworths, Sydney, 2002)
257. Patrick Parkinson ‘The Conscience of Equity’ in Patrick Parkinson (ed.), The Principles of Equity (Law Book Company, North Rhyde, NSW, 1996), at 34.
258. P. Birks and C. N. Yin, ‘On the Nature of Undue Influence’, in J. Beatson and D. Friedmann (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995).
259. R. Pearce and J. Stevens, The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations (Butterworths, London and Edinburgh 1995) at 118
260. G. Fridman, Law of Agency (Butterworths, London and Edinburgh, 1996), at 174-188.
261. Kevin Lingren, ‘Estoppel in Contract’ (1989) 12 NSWLJ 153, at 155-156.
262. G. E. Dal Pont and D. R. C. Chalmers, Equity and Trusts in Australia and New Zealand (Law Book Company, North Rhyde, NSW, 1996), at 329-330.
263. R. Goff and G. Jones, The Law of Restitution (4th edn, Sweet &Maxwell, London, 1993), at 16
264. R. B. Grantham and C. E. F. Rickett, Enrichment and Restitution in New Zealand (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2000), at 9-10.
265. G. C. Cheshire, C.H. S. Fifoot and M. P. Furmston, Law of Contract (12th edn, Butterworths, London, 1991), at 562-565.
266. N. C. Seddon and M. P. Ellinghaus, Cheshire and Fifoot’s Law of Contract (7th edn, Butterworths, London, 1997) 471.
267. Pearce and Stevens, The Law of Trusts, at 118.
268. Beatson and Friedmann (eds.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law, at 174
269. S. F. C. Milsom, Historical Foundations of the Common Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981), at 99-150
270. R. C. Van Caenegam, The Birth of the English Common Law (2nd edn, Butterworths, London 1988)
271. J. N. Adams and R. Brownsword, Key Issues in Contract (Butterworths, London and Edinburgh, 1995), at 355.
272. R. Bigwood, Exploitative Contracts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
273. Robert L. Hale, ‘Bargaining, Duress and Economic Liberty’, 43 Colum. LR 603
274. Michael Philips, ‘Are Coerced Agreements Involuntary?’ (1984) 3 Law and Phil 133
275. R. Bigwood, ‘Coercion in Contract: The Theoretical Constructs of Duress’ (1996) 46 U Tor. LJ 201
276. R. Bigwood, ‘Undue Influence: ‘‘Impaired Consent’’ or ‘‘Wicked Exploitation’’?’ (1996) 16 OJLS 503
277. P. D. Finn, ‘Unconscionable Conduct’ (1994) 8 Jnl of Contract Law 37
278. G.H. Treitel, The Law of Contract (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1999).
279. Anthony T. Kronman, ‘Contract Law and Distributive Justice’ (1980) 89 Yale LJ 473
280. Jane Stapleton, ‘The Golden Thread at the Heart of Tort Law: Protection of the Vulnerable’ (2003) 24 Australian Bar Review, 41.
281. Paul Craig, ‘Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review’ (1998) 57 Camb. LJ 63
282. E. P. Thompson, Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Art (Allen Lane, London, 1975), at 259.
283. Roger Cotterrell, The Politics of Jurisprudence (Butterworths, London, 1989), at 188
284. Duncan Kennedy, A Critique of Adjudication Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, (1998)
285. Roberto Mangabeira Unger, Knowledge and Politics (Free Press, New York, 1975), at 242-243.
286. E. W. Thomas, A Return to Principle in Judicial Reasoning and an Acclamation of Judicial Autonomy 4 (1993) VUWLR Mono. S, at 1