Geophysical monitoring methods evaluation for the FutureGen 2.0 project

Energy Procedia

Volumn 63, Issue , 2014, Pages 4394-4403

  Strickland, Chris E ^a   Vermeul, Vince R ^a   Bonneville, Alain ^a   Sullivan, E Charlotte ^a   Johnson, Tim C ^a   Spane, Frank A ^a   Gilmore, Tyler J ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; Carbon sequestration; Geophysics; Monitoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922875079     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.474     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. 2 Storage at the FutureGen 2.0 Site, Morgan County, Illinois, USA. Energy Procedia, 37, 6125-6132.
2. 2 Geological Storage Site for the FutureGen Project in Morgan County Illinois, USA, GHGT12, this issue.
3. Eisner, L., W. Heigl, P. Duncan, and W. Keller. 2009. Uncertainties in passive seismic monitoring. The Leading Edge 28:648- 655.
4. 2e Guide: Version 1.0 Rep. PNNL-21268, PNNL-21268, Richland, Washington.
5. 2 plume development. Energy Procedia. 1(2009):2103-2110.
6. 2 flood: Results during 10 years of injection. Energy Procedia 4, 3628-3635.
7. 2 at the FutureGen site -A modeling study based on rock physics principles. Unpublished report to Battelle, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
8. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J., 1998, Rock physics handbook: Tools for seismic analysis in porous media: Cambridge University Press.
9. 2 Temperature on a Geological Reservoir- Application to the FutureGen 2.0 site, GHGT12, this issue.
10. Oldenburg DW & Pratt DA. 2007. Geophysical inversion for mineral exploration: A decade of progress in theory and practice. In: B. Milkereit (ed), Proceedings of Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, 61-95.
11. Butsch, R, A.L. Brown, B. Bryans, C. Kolb, and S. Horvorka. 2013. Integration of well-based monitoring technologies: Lessons learned at SECARB study, Cranfield, MS. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 18: 409-410.
12. 2 using 4D seismic, petrophysical data, core measurements and well logging: A case study at Ketzin, Germany. Geophysical Prospecting 60:957-973.
13. 2 in a brine aquifer. Environmental Geology 54: 1657-1665.
14. Johnson, T.C., R.J. Versteeg, A. Ward, F.D. Day-Lewis, and A. Revil. 2010. Improved hydrogeophysical characterization and monitoring through parallel modeling and inversion of time-domain resistivity and induced polarization data. Geophysics 75(4):WA27-WA41.
15. Commer, M. and G.A. Newman. 2009. Three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric joint inversion. Geophysical Journal International 178:1305-1316.