Heidegger?s critique of husserl?s and brentano?s accounts of intentionality

Inquiry (United Kingdom)

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 39-65

  Moran, Dermot ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922853967     PISSN: 0020174X     EISSN: 15023923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002017400321361     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. M. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1993).
2. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, Being and Time (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967).
3. F. Brentano, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, trans. A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell and L. McAlister, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 1995).
4. E. Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen, trans. John Findlay as Logical Investigations (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970).
5. E. Husserl, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book, transl. F. Kersten (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1983), p. 349.
6. Michael Heim, The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992), p. 168.
7. M. Heidegger, Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie, GA Band 24 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1989).
8. A. Hofstadter, Basic Problems of Phenomenology (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1982), p. 58.
9. M. Heidegger, Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs, GA 20 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1979).
10. T. Kisiel, History of the Concept of Time. Prolegomena (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985), p. 129.
11. K. Twardowski, Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen. Eine Psychologische Untersuchung (Vienna, 1894).
12. R. Grossmann as On the Content and Object of Presentations (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1977).
13. J. N. Mohanty, Husserl and Frege (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982).
14. E. Husserl, ‘Critical Discussion of K. Twardowski, Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand’, in Early Writings in the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics, trans. Dallas Willard, Husserl Collected Works V (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994), pp. 388-395.
15. Hubert L. Dreyfus, ‘Sinn and Intentional Object’, in Robert Solomon, ed., Phenomenology and Existentialism (New York: Harper & Row, 1972), pp. 196-210.
16. G. Frege, Kleine Schriften (Hildesheim: Olms, 1967), p. 353.
17. Husserl, Formale und Transzendentale Logik (1929).
18. D. Cairns as Formal and Transcendental Logic (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1969), p. 155.
19. Husserl’s 1913 (at the time unpublished) Introduction to the Logical Investigations, trans. P. J. Bossert and C. J. Peters (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1975), p. 40.
20. Hubert L. Dreyfus’s penetrating critique of ‘fulfilment’ in his essay, ‘Husserl’s Perceptual Noema’, in Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982), pp. 97-124.
21. John R. Searle, Intentionality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), p. 10.
22. Dagfinn Follesdal, ‘Husserl on Evidence and Justification’, in R. Sokolowski, ed., Edmund Husserl and the Phenomenological Tradition (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1988), pp. 107-129.
23. J. Stambaugh, On Time and Being (New York: Harper & Row, 1972), p. 75.
24. Theodore Kisiel, The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), pp. 362-420.
25. M. Heidegger, ‘Preface’, in William J. Richardson, Heidegger. Through Phenomenology to Thought (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1963), p. 16.
26. M. Heidegger, ‘Die Idee der Philosophie und das Weltanschauungsproblem’, Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie, GA Band 56/57 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1987), p. 73.
27. Rudolf Bernet, ‘Le monde’, La vie du sujet (Paris: PUF, 1994), pp. 93-118.