Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 335-342

  dos Reis Brandão da Silveira, Simone ^a   Haddad, Jorge Milhem ^a   de Jármy Di Bella, Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin ^b   Nastri, Fernanda ^a   Kawabata, Miriam Goncalves Markos ^a   da Silva Carramão, Silvia ^c   Rodrigues, Claudinei Alves ^b   Baracat, Edmund Chada ^a   Auge, Antonio Pedro Flores ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c IRMANDADE DA SANTA CASA DE MISERICÓRDIA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Genital prolapse; Mesh repair; Native vaginal tissue repair; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NATIVE TISSUE REPAIR; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SURGICAL MESH; TISSUE REPAIR; UTERUS PROLAPSE; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RECURRENT DISEASE; REOPERATION; SEXUALITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE PROLAPSE; VAGINA;

POLYPROPYLENE;

AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POLYPROPYLENES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECURRENCE; REOPERATION; SEXUALITY; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE PROLAPSE; VAGINA;

EID: 84922819851     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: 14333023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2501-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Drutz HP, Alarab M (2006) Pelvic organ prolapse: demographics and future growth prospects. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17 [Suppl 1]:S6–S9. doi:10.1007/s00192-006-0102-1
2. Rortveit G, Brown JS, Thom DH, Van Den Eeden SK, Creasman JM, Subak LL (2007) Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort. Obstet Gynecol 109(6):1396–1403
3. Fox SD, Stanton SL (2000) Vault prolapse and rectocele: assessment of repair using sacrocolpopexy with mesh interposition. BJOG 107(11):1371–1375
4. Deval B, Haab F (2003) What's new in prolapse surgery? Curr Opin Urol 13(4):315–323. doi:10.1097/01.mou.0000079416.62186.73
5. Deprest J, Zheng F, Konstantinovic M, Spelzini F, Claerhout F, Steensma A, Ozog Y, De Ridder D (2006) The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17 [Suppl 1]:S16–S25. doi:10.1007/s00192-006-0101-2
6. Davila GW, Baessler K, Cosson M, Cardozo L (2012) Selection of patients in whom vaginal graft use may be appropriate. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA grafts roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23 [Suppl 1]:S7–S14. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1677-3
7. Slack M, Ostergard D, Cervigni M, Deprest J (2012) A standardized description of graft-containing meshes and recommended steps before the introduction of medical devices for prolapse surgery. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA grafts roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23 [Suppl 1]:S15–26. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1678-2
8. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17
9. De Oliveira MS, Tamanini JT, de Aguiar CG (2009) Validation of the prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QoL) in Portuguese version in Brazilian women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(10):1191–1202. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0934-6
10. Abdo CHN (2006) Development and validation of female sexual quotient - a questionnaire to assess female sexual function. Rev Bras Med 63(9):477–482
11. Williamson A (2005) Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 14:798–804
12. Ng CC, Han WH (2004) Comparison of effectiveness of vaginal and abdominal routes in treating severe uterovaginal or vault prolapse. Singapore Med J 45(10):475–481
13. Fatton BF, Amblard JA, Dabadie CD, Debodinance PD, Cosson MC, Jacquetin BJ, International Urogynecological Association (2006) Preliminary results of the “Prolift™” technique in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse by vaginal approach: a multicentric retrospective series of 110 patients. Int Urogynecol J 17(2):S171–S359
14. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S (2005) P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(3):176–181. doi:10.1007/s00192-004-1225-x, discussion 181
15. Lopes ED, Lemos NL, Carramao Sda S, Lunardelli JL, Ruano JM, Aoki T, Auge AP (2010) Transvaginal polypropylene mesh versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of uterine prolapse: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 21(4):389–394. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-1052-1
16. Schmid C, O’Rourke P, Maher C (2013) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after failed transvaginal polypropylene mesh surgery. Int Urogynecol J 24(5):763–767. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1926-5
17. Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, Fine P, Menefee S, Ridgeway B, Visco A, Warren LK, Zhang M, Meikle S (2013) Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA 309(19):2016–2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.4919
18. Lo TS, Ashok K (2011) Combined anterior trans-obturator mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in women with severe prolapse–a case series of 30 months follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 22(3):299–306. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1266-2
19. Lo TS, Tan YL, Khanuengkitkong S, Dass AK (2013) Surgical outcomes of anterior trans-obturator mesh and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for severe pelvic organ prolapse in overweight and obese Asian women. Int Urogynecol J 24(5):809–816. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1940-7
20. Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P, Cosson M, Jacquetin B (2007) Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift technique)–a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(7):743–752. doi:10.1007/s00192-006-0234-3
21. Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P, Ha Duc E, Lucot JP, Cosson M (2006) Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(4):315–320. doi:10.1007/s00192-005-0003-8
22. Caquant F, Collinet P, Debodinance P, Berrocal J, Garbin O, Rosenthal C, Clave H, Villet R, Jacquetin B, Cosson M (2008) Safety of trans vaginal mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34(4):449–456. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00820.x
23. Moore RD, Miklos JR (2009) Vaginal mesh kits for pelvic organ prolapse, friend or foe: a comprehensive review. ScientificWorldJournal 9:163–189. doi:10.1100/tsw.2009.19
24. Robinson D, Cardozo L (2011) Estrogens and the lower urinary tract. Neurourol Urodyn 30(5):754–757. doi:10.1002/nau.21106
25. Weidner AC, Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Myers ER (2013) Computer modeling informs study design: vaginal estrogen to prevent mesh erosion after different routes of prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 24(3):441–445. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1877-x
26. Feldner PC Jr, Castro RA, Cipolotti LA, Delroy CA, Sartori MG, Girao MJ (2010) Anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial of SIS graft versus traditional colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecol J 21(9):1057–1063. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1163-8
27. Lensen EJ, Withagen MI, Kluivers KB, Milani AL, Vierhout ME (2013) Comparison of two trocar-guided trans-vaginal mesh systems for repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 24(10):1723–1731. doi:10.1007/s00192-013-2098-7