Sustainable development goals and quality of life targets: Insights from Metro Manila

Current Sociology

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 244-260

  Porio, Emma ^a  

^a ATENEO DE MANILA UNIVERSITY   (Philippines)

Author keywords

Millennium Development Goals; quality of life; social indicators; sustainable development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922814145     PISSN: 00113921     EISSN: 14617064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011392114556586     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Asiaweek (2000) Best cities in Asia: How we did it. Available at: www.asiaweek.com/asiaweek/features/asiacities2000/how.html.
2. Briones R, et alPhilippine Institute of Development Studies; 2011:
3. Dom’s Ranking of Most Livable Cities (2009) Available at: www.walkablestreets.com/livable.htm.
4. Galing Pook Foundation: Awardees (2013) Available at: www.galingpook.org/awardees.htm.
5. Leftwich A.Governance, democracy and development in the Third World.Third World Quarterly. 1993;14 (3): 605-624
6. Report on London’s Quality of Life Indicators. London: Greater London Authority; 2004:
7. Government report on the progress of MDGs (Data Base for MDG Applications). 2009;:
8. Quality of Life in New Zealand’s Large Urban Areas (2007) Available at: www.bigcities.govt.nz/indicators.htm.
9. Tan E-S.Developing quality of life indicators: Lessons from the Singapore project.Quality of Life Conference; 2007Vietnam Open University, Ho Chi Minh City; 2007.
10. Human Development Report 2003. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003:
11. United Nations (2001) Indicators for sustainable development: Guidelines and methodologies. Available at: www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/isd-ms2001isd.htm.
12. Urban Ecology Coalition (2013) Neighborhood indicators guidebook. Available at: www.crcworks.org/guide.pdf (accessed 15 September 2013).