Host diversity affects the abundance of the extraradical arbuscular mycorrhizal network

New Phytologist

Volumn 205, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1485-1491

  Engelmoer, Daniel J P ^a   Kiers, E Toby ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Rhizophagus irregularis; Common mycelial networks; Competition; Cooperation; in vitro root organ cultures; Kin selection; Mutualism

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FUNGUS; KIN SELECTION; MONOCULTURE; MUTUALISM; PREDICTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

DAUCUS CAROTA; FUNGI; MEDICAGO; RHIZOPHAGUS;

BIODIVERSITY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MICROBIOLOGY; MYCORRHIZA; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SYMBIOSIS;

BIODIVERSITY; MYCORRHIZAE; PLANTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 84922792921     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13086     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Babikova Z, Gilbert L, Bruce TJ, Birkett M, Caulfield JC, Woodcock C, Pickett JA, Johnson D. 2013. Underground signals carried through common mycelial networks warn neighbouring plants of aphid attack. Ecology Letters 16: 835-843.
2. Babikova Z, Johnson D, Bruce T, Pickett J, Gilbert L. 2014. Underground allies: how and why do mycelial networks help plants defend themselves? BioEssays 36: 21-26.
3. Barto EK, Hilker M, Müller F, Mohney BK, Weidenhamer JD, Rillig MC. 2011. The fungal fast lane: common mycorrhizal networks extend bioactive zones of allelochemicals in soils. PLoS ONE 6: e27195.
4. Bebber DP, Hynes J, Darrah PR, Boddy L, Fricker MD. 2007. Biological solutions to transport network design. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274: 2307-2315.
5. Biedrzycki ML, Jilany TA, Dudley SA, Bais HP. 2010. Root exudates mediate kin recognition in plants. Communicative and Integrative Biology 3: 28-35.
6. Bucking H, Shachar-Hill Y. 2005. Phosphate uptake, transport and transfer by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices is stimulated by increased carbohydrate availability. New Phytologist 165: 899-911.
7. Cardenas-Flores A, Draye X, Bivort C, Cranenbrouck S, Declerck S. 2010. Impact of multispores in vitro subcultivation of Glomus sp. MUCL 43194 (DAOM 197198) on vegetative compatibility and genetic diversity detected by AFLP. Mycorrhiza 20: 415-425.
8. Croll D, Giovannetti M, Koch AM, Sbrana C, Ehinger M, Lammers PJ, Sanders IR. 2009. Nonself vegetative fusion and genetic exchange in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. New Phytologist 181: 924-937.
9. Declerck S, Strullu DG, Fortin JA. 2005. In vitro culture of mycorrhizas. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
10. Derelle D, Declerck S, Genet P, Dajoz I, van Aarle IM. 2012. Association of highly and weakly mycorrhizal seedlings can promote the extra- and intraradical development of a common mycorrhizal network. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 79: 251-259.
11. Duhamel M, Pel R, Ooms A, Bucking H, Jansa J, Ellers J, van Straalen NM, Wouda T, Vandenkoornhuyse P, Kiers ET. 2013. Do fungivores trigger the transfer of protective metabolites from host plants to arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae? Ecology 94: 2019-2029.
12. Engelmoer DJP, Behm JE, Toby Kiers E. 2014. Intense competition between arbuscular mycorrhizal mutualists in an in vitro root microbiome negatively affects total fungal abundance. Molecular Ecology 23: 1584-1593.
13. Fellbaum CR, Gachomo EW, Beesetty Y, Choudhan S, Strahan GD, Pfeffer PE, Kiers ET, Bucking H. 2012. Carbon availability triggers fungal nitrogen uptake and transport in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 2666-2671.
14. File AL, Klironomos J, Maherali H, Dudley SA. 2012. Plant kin recognition enhances abundance of symbiotic microbial partner. PLoS ONE 7: e45648.
15. Giovannetti M, Fortuna P, Citernesi AS, Morini S, Nuti MP. 2001. The occurrence of anastomosis formation and nuclear exchange in intact arbuscular mycorrhizal networks. New Phytologist 151: 717-724.
16. Giovannetti M, Sbrana C, Avio L, Strani P. 2004. Patterns of below-ground plant interconnection established by means of arbuscular mycorrhizal networks. New Phytologist 164: 175-181.
17. Hammer EC, Pallon J, Wallander H, Olsson PA. 2011. Tit for tat? A mycorrhizal fungus accumulates phosphorus under low plant carbon availability. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 76: 236-244.
18. Hart MM, Forsythe J, Oshowski B, Bücking H, Jansa J, Kiers ET. 2013. Hiding in a crowd-does diversity facilitate persistence of a low-quality fungal partner in the mycorrhizal symbiosis? Symbiosis 59: 47-56.
19. Hartnett DC, Wilson GWT. 1999. Mycorrhizae influence plant community structure and diversity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 80: 1187-1195.
20. Heaton L, Obara B, Grau V, Jones N, Nakagaki T, Boddy L, Fricker MD. 2012. Analysis of fungal networks. Fungal Biology Reviews 26: 12-29.
21. van der Heijden MGA, Horton TR. 2009. Socialism in soil? The importance of mycorrhizal fungal networks for facilitation in natural ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 97: 1139-1150.
22. 2 pulse-labelling of upland grassland demonstrates a rapid pathway of carbon flux from arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelia to the soil. New Phytologist 153: 327-334.
23. Kiers ET, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah JA, Franken O, Verbruggen E, Fellbaum CR, Kowalchuk GA, Hart MM, Bago A et al. 2011. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 333: 880-882.
24. Koch AM, Kuhn G, Fontanillas P, Fumagalli L, Goudet J, Sanders IR. 2004. High genetic variability and low local diversity in a population of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 2369-2374.
25. Mikkelsen BL, Rosendahl S, Jakobsen I. 2008. Underground resource allocation between individual networks of mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 180: 890-898.
26. Olsson PA, van Aarle IM, Allaway WG, Ashford AE, Rouhier H. 2002. Phosphorus effects on metabolic processes in monoxenic arbuscular mycorrhiza cultures. Plant Physiology 130: 1162-1171.
27. Pfeffer PE, Douds DD, Bucking H, Schwartz DP, Shachar-Hill Y. 2004. The fungus does not transfer carbon to or between roots in an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist 163: 617-627.
28. Simard SW, Durall DM. 2004. Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function, and importance. Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 1140-1165.
29. Tawaraya K. 2003. Arbuscular mycorrhizal dependency of different plant species and cultivars. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 49: 655-668.
30. Tero A, Takagi S, Saigusa T, Ito K, Bebber DP, Fricker MD, Yumiki K, Kobayashi R, Nakagaki T. 2010. Rules for biologically inspired adaptive network design. Science 327: 439-442.
31. Voets L, de la Providencia IE, Fernandez K, M IJ, Cranenbrouck S, Declerck S. 2009. Extraradical mycelium network of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi allows fast colonization of seedlings under in vitro conditions. Mycorrhiza 19: 347-356.
32. Wagg C, Jansa J, Stadler M, Schmid B, van der Heijden MGA. 2011a. Mycorrhizal fungal identity and diversity relaxes plant-plant competition. Ecology 92: 1303-1313.
33. Walder F, Niemann H, Natarajan M, Lehmann MF, Boller T, Wiemken A. 2012. Mycorrhizal networks: common goods of plants shared under unequal terms of trade. Plant Physiology 159: 789-797.
34. Wyatt GA, Kiers ET, Gardner A, West SA. 2014. A biological market analysis of the plant-mycorrhizal symbiosis. Evolution 38: 2603-2618.