Validation of an automated surveillance approach for drain-related meningitis: A multicenter study

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 65-75

  Van Mourik, Maaike S M ^a   Troelstra, Annet ^a   Van Der Sprenkel, Jan Willem Berkelbach ^a   Van Der Jagt Zwetsloot, Marischka C E ^a   Nelson, Jolande H ^b   Vos, Piet ^b   Arts, Mark P ^c   Dennesen, Paul J W ^c   Moons, Karel G M ^a   Bonten, Marc J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology   (Netherlands)

^c MEDICAL CENTER HAAGLANDEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED SURVEILLANCE APPROACH; BACILLUS; CALIBRATION; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; COAGULASE NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; DRAIN RELATED MENINGITIS; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; ENTEROCOCCUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MENINGITIS; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STREPTOCOCCUS; VENTRICULOSTOMY CATHETER; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ALGORITHM; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; AUTOMATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SHUNTING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS INFECTION; HEALTH SURVEY; MICROBIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; AREA UNDER CURVE; AUTOMATION; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SHUNTS; CROSS INFECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENINGITIS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84922790910     PISSN: 0899823X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2014.5     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Freeman R, Moore LS, Garcia AL, Charlett A, Holmes A. Advances in electronic surveillance for healthcare-associated infections in the 21st century: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2013;84:106-119.
2. van Mourik MS, Troelstra A, van Solinge WW, Moons KG, Bonten MJ. Automated surveillance for healthcare-associated infections: opportunities for improvement. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57:85-93.
3. Trick WE. Decision making during healthcare-associated infection surveillance: a rationale for automation. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57:434-440.
4. Tokars JI, Richards C, Andrus M, et al. The changing face of surveillance for health care-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:1347-1352.
5. Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:182-205.
6. Haustein T, Gastmeier P, Holmes A, et al. Use of benchmarking and public reporting for infection control in four high-income countries. Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11:471-481.
7. Geubbels EL, Nagelkerke NJ, Mintjes-De Groot AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Grobbee DE, De Boer AS. Reduced risk of surgical site infections through surveillance in a network. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:127-133.
8. Lin MY, Hota B, Khan YM, et al. Quality of traditional surveillance for public reporting of nosocomial bloodstream infection rates. JAMA 2010;304:2035-2041.
9. Klompas M. Interobserver variability in ventilator-associated pneumonia surveillance. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:237-239.
10. Mayer J, Greene T, Howell J, et al. Agreement in classifying bloodstream infections among multiple reviewers conducting surveillance. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:364-370.
11. Klompas M. Eight initiatives that misleadingly lower ventilatorassociated pneumonia rates. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:408-410.
12. Woeltje KF. Moving into the future: electronic surveillance for healthcare-associated infections. J Hosp Infect 2013;84:103-105.
13. Klompas M, Yokoe DS. Automated surveillance of health careassociated infections. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:1268-1275.
14. van Mourik MS, Moons KG, van Solinge WW, et al. Automated detection of healthcare associated infections: external validation and updating of a model for surveillance of drain-related meningitis. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e51509.
15. Lozier AP, Sciacca RR, Romagnoli MF, Connolly ES. Ventriculostomy-related infections: a critical review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2002;51:170-181.
16. Scheithauer S, Burgel U, Bickenbach J, et al. External ventricular and lumbar drainage-associated meningoventriculitis: prospective analysis of time-dependent infection rates and risk factor analysis. Infection 2010;38:205-209.
17. Lyke KE, Obasanjo OO, Williams MA, O'Brien M, Chotani R, Perl TM. Ventriculitis complicating use of intraventricular catheters in adult neurosurgical patients. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:2028-2033.
18. Leverstein-Van Hall MA, Hopmans TEM, Van Der Sprenkel JWB, et al. A bundle approach to reduce the incidence of external ventricular and lumbar drain-related infections: Clinical article. J Neurosurg 2010;112:345-353.
19. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309-332.
20. Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KG. Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ 2009;338:b605.
21. Justice AC, Covinsky KE, Berlin JA. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:515-524.
22. ten Berg MJ, Huisman A, van den Bemt PM, Schobben AF, Egberts AC, van Solinge WW. Linking laboratory and medication data: new opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:13-19.
23. van Mourik MS, Groenwold RH, Berkelbach van der Sprenkel JW, van Solinge WW, Troelstra A, Bonten MJ. Automated detection of external ventricular and lumbar drain-related meningitis using laboratory and microbiology results and medication data. PLoS One 2011;6:e22846.
24. Donders AR, van der Heijden GJ, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1087-1091.
25. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 2009;338:b2393.
26. Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models: A practical approach to development, validation, and updating. New York: Springer, 2009.
27. Keller SC, Linkin DR, Fishman NO, Lautenbach E. Variations in identification of healthcare-associated infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:678-686.
28. Dixon-Woods M, Leslie M, Bion J, Tarrant C. What counts? An ethnographic study of infection data reported to a patient safety program. Milbank Q 2012;90:548-591.
29. Trick WE. Building a data warehouse for infection control. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:S75-S81.
30. Tejedor SC, Garrett G, Jacob JT, et al. Electronic documentation of central venous catheter-days: validation is essential. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:900-907.
31. Wright MO, Fisher A, John M, Reynolds K, Peterson LR, Robicsek A. The electronic medical record as a tool for infection surveillance: successful automation of device-days. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:364-370.
32. Janssen KJ, Vergouwe Y, Donders AR, et al. Dealing with missing predictor values when applying clinical prediction models. Clin Chem 2009;55:994-1001.
33. Lin MY, Bonten MJ. The Dilemma of Assessment Bias in Infection Control Research. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54: 1342-1347.
34. De Bruin JS, Blacky A, Koller W, Adlassnig KP. Validation of fuzzy sets in an automated detection system for intensive-careunit- acquired central-venous-catheter-related infections. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013;192:215-218.